Preview

The Problem Of Evil: Against The Existence Of God Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
742 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Problem Of Evil: Against The Existence Of God Analysis
In this paper I will evaluate The Problem of Evil: Against the Existence of God.
I believe that the following argument is unsound because there is a premise missing. If the addition of this premise was present, I believe that the structure of the argument from premise 3 and down would change. This change would allow the argument to be both valid and sound. I feel as though it is missing the point where humans were given free will. In doing so, humans would be allowed to choose between doing good or doing evil. Therefore, premise 3 would be false. There would be evil in the world; however, the evil would have been a choice made by humans not God himself. So, God is not held responsible for evil in the world.
To further explain, it is said that
…show more content…
Why would evil be an option? I feel like if we asked for less evil and suffering, it would be like having a babysitter watching us our whole lives. We would always be protected, and if we are always being watched, then how would we ever learn or experience things on our own. We technically would no longer have free will. Also, even if God were to get rid of evil, we would eventually find something else that bother us which would be perceived as evil. The question that comes into play here is where would we draw the line as to what is too much evil or too much of anything unpleasant? Our understanding of evil and suffering is only relative to our own …show more content…
But now we have seen that—alter the universe as you wish—it does not affect the problem. It therefore does not arise in the first place”. I believe that he is right. I think that there is a misunderstanding of what omnipotence means. I think it means that God cannot be more powerful than he currently is because his power is already perfect. I believe that the answer to the problem of evil is that God gave us free will, because freedom is inherently good. Free will means the possibility of doing what is different than God’s will (better known as evil). So, evil exists because of human’s choices/actions, rather than because of God. Therefore, God does

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The explanation for why someone or something is evil can not be easily defined, as the answer may vary based on a person’s psychological thought process or intellectual reasoning. The justification of this paper is to discuss Peter Van Inwagen and his philosophical response to the argument from evil, as well as his free will defense theory for the answer to this complication. I will carefully evaluate the two standard objections to his solution and offer my personal opinion of rather or not he offers a successful resolution for this universal problem.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evil, how did it happen and why is it still here on this earth? There is this belief that the Christian God is good and all-powerful. He has the power to create worlds and beings, yet there is still evil in the world. Both Pierre Bayle and Voltaire address these questions in their works “Paulicians” and Candide (respectively). They both believe the Manichean philosophy as a more rational thought process than the contemporaneous Christian view. This belief is that there is not one, but two gods in the world; a god of good and a god of evil. I myself believe in a world of balance and like the two authors listed above, accept this as more rational thought than a single omnipotent god. My reasoning is that without evil, there is no concept of good,…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The only discussed solution that does not hold God responsible for evil in the world is the compatibilist approach to free will. Upon formulating this solution the two major issues are on the interpretation of omnipotence and freedom.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Irenaeus Theodicy, often called Soul Making, is a counterpart to Augustine's Theodicy, yet it is also and opposing argument. While Augustine stated that evil came from humans and Adam in Genesis, Irenaeus proposes that evil is opposing the human races' bid to become one with God.…

    • 935 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    protocol paper 1

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Recall: In "The problem of evil," James Rachels and Stuart Rachels provider some important point: 1) Pain is not body’s warning system needed, because newborn babies did not deserve inexorable pain; 2) Even If we need evil to appreciate the good, but it is does not explain why there is such an extraordinary amount of evil in this world; 3) The doctrine of original sin was absurd. According to authors, it would be come to a conclusion that a newborn baby did deserve terrible disease. 4) The idea that Free Will Defense is in apparent contradiction to the natural evil in the world. 5) Based on the idea that a world without suffering would be void of the virtues necessary for good moral development. It does not explain the reason that God allowed the Holocaust or isolated cases of extreme cruelty to happen. 6) The theory of moral development does not explain the reason why animals suffering.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If God were to exist, then why do we have evil? Evil things happen to good people so if God were to exist then why does he let it happen? When slavery was created, it was a time where white people would have black people as their slave. The slaves would get treated bad and would get punished if they did not do what they were told to do by the owners. The slaves would get punished by having a ball and chain around them to know where they were at. Some of them would even be sentenced to death when they would not do what they were told or just did not do the kind of job that the owner wanted them to do. The slaves would pray and worship to God to save them. They would even sing songs through worship to help them out during this evil time. So, you would think even though the slaves would worship God and God knew what was happening, why would this still happen to them?…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The problem with the logical problem of evil is plain and simple to what you’re reading. The word logical is the key. We as people like to think that suffering and evil will lead to build morality and character. But where is the proof? A theist could also say that you can prevent suffering and evil by your own freedom and choices. But clearly that isn’t the case and anything could happen at any given moment. A counter-example is if a man was walking on the sidewalk and gets hit by a car from behind, and suffers and dies slowly. How can you prove that this incident was for the greater good? If there was an omniscient being how could he not prevent this or let him die instantly instead of suffering? That is the evidential problem of evil’s argument.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: James Rachels addresses the conflicts of evil in his book “Problems from Philosophy” by providing various forms of logical problems. The author points out the different possible explanations to why evil would exist. The first major idea Rachels makes is that perhaps pain is essential to caution people of danger. He goes on to suggest that this would not account for why some people are born with deadly diseases. Another idea he makes is that evil helps people appreciate the good in life. One would not be able to distinguish the good in life if evil did not exist. However, this does not explain why the world needs so much evil to exist, instead of letting a few bad things happen occasionally. The third idea the author makes questions why bad things happen to good people. Rachels suggests maybe those bad things that occur in life are…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theology 202 Essay 1

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The question of evil is a common hot button topic among atheists and non-Christians who attempt to disprove Christianity. They argue that an omnipotent and omniscient God cannot exist in a world with so much evil. The argument is used by them to try to prove that Christianity is “internally self-contradictory and thereby to be rejected.” Many claim that a benevolent and caring God would certainly not create evil or allow it to flourish in the world that He created. So, the problem of evil is how to explain that there can be a perfect, all-powerful, and all-loving God that exists in a world with so much moral and natural evil.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chapter 13 Essay

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As I mentioned before religiously I was told the free will defense although I didn’t know it was a philosophy idea as well. There are many different ideas trying to show that both statements are true: There is an omnipotent and omnibenevolent God. And there is evil (Jensen 312). One explanation is that God is limited (Jensen 312). Another is his ways cannot be scrutinized (Jensen 313). Leibniz proposed that a perfect world is not logically possible (Jensen 314). Tennant said that evils are a necessary by-product of nature (Jensen 314). Another idea is that evil is a way to grow as a person a sort of therapy (Jensen 323). Some like John Stuart Mill proposed “radical surgery” by saying that God is not omnipotent (Jensen 311). Alvin Plantinga defended God from being responsible for evil by saying that for moral good to be present humans must be capable of moral evil as well (Jensen 321). My favorite thought in this chapter is from John Hick and his writings on Irenaeus a Christian theologian. Hick suggests that man was created imperfect and immature creature who needed to go through a moral development and growth before his final stage of perfection that was intended for him by the creator. I love this idea because the Bible makes man a sinner who destroyed his perfection and then plunged into sin and misery for the remainder of his existence (Jensen…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Problem of Evil

    • 1445 Words
    • 54 Pages

    Throughout the article he considers several aspects highlighting how they prove and disprove his thesis. After considering the arguments I will provide my own opinion on the analyses and the arguments provided about the existence of evil and God. The author, Peter Van Inwagen’s position on The Argument of Evil is that because of…

    • 1445 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Probably the most powerful reason against the existence of The Classical God of Theism (hereafter referred to as God) is evil and suffering in the world. The problem of evil is an ‘a posterori’ argument, established from experience based on empirical senses. It is also synthetic as evil and suffering can be seen around us daily. There are a number of possible reasons for the problem of evil and why it causes a problem for religious believers, making it an inductive argument also. In his book Philosophy of Religion John Hick defined evil and suffering as “physical pain, mental suffering and moral wickedness”…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Does God Allow Evil?

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people dispute the true intentions of God, himself, since the beginning of mankind. Opposing and concurring arguments can be just as primitive. Regardless of personal perspective on any indefinite theory, it is undeniable that the controversy between good and evil will inevitably exist. Two dominant philosophers discussed in “The Problem of Evil” are Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and David Hume. Both of these authors discuss interesting motives from both sides of the issue: why and why not God should allow evil.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument from evil

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    god exists. God being who he is would want to protect us all from evil because he is…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays