the principles and processes for setting executive compensation

Good Essays
Describe the principles and processes for setting executive compensation?

Agency theory, tournament theory and social comparison theory are the 3 alternative theories that explain the principles and processes for setting executive compensation. Different individuals and groups participate in setting executive compensation. They include compensation consultants, compensation committees, and boards of directors; each play a different role in setting executive compensation. Executive compensation consultants usually propose several recommendations for alternate pay packages they are often employed by large consulting firms. A board of directors represents shareholders’ interests by weighing the pros and cons of top executives’ decisions. There are approximately 15 members on the board. They give final approval of the compensation committee’s recommendation. Board of directors members within and outside the company make up a company’s compensation committee. Outside board members serve on compensation committees to minimize conflict of interest. Compensation committees perform three duties. First, compensation committees review consultants’ alternate recommendations for compensation packages. Second, compensation committee members discuss the assets and liabilities of the recommendations. Third, the committee recommends the consultant’s best proposal to the board of directors for their consideration.
Under agency theory, shareholders delegate control to top executives to represent their ownership interests; however top executives usually do not own majority shares of their companies’ stocks. Shareholders negotiate executive employment contracts with executives to minimize loss of control. Tournament theory casts lucrative executive compensation as the prize in a series of tournaments or contests among middle and top level managers who aspire to become CEOs. According to social comparison theory individuals needs to evaluate their accomplishments and they do so by

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    CEO’s and Upper Management’s Acceptance of over Compensation Are Unethical during Times of Financial Struggle within Organizations…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ceo Compensation

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As Murphy (1998) rightly points out, CEO compensation has become one of the most debated issues in the recent past. A lot of research in this field has been conducted to determine the relationship between CEO pay levels with the corporate performance, firm size, board vigilance, CEO’s human capital, tenure & age. But the results of these researches are not very hopeful and have yielded conflicting results. This review aims at understanding these relationships and also tries to provide an ethical perspective on CEO compensation.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Executive Compensation

    • 15228 Words
    • 61 Pages

    The economic downturn in late 2008 brought forth the resurgence of an interesting topic - executive compensation. This topic was bound to bring much controversy as a result of the dramatic increase in executive compensation over the last decade[2] and the recent massive failure of many large companies.[3]…

    • 15228 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the problems of corporate control, agency theory reflects corporate governance system, especially the board of directors. It represents a basic supervising method to try to minimize issues that principal and agent relationship may bring. The inside managers want to be the ‘agents’ of a company’s ‘owners’, however, managers must be supervised and the arrangement of an institution must provide some balance and checks to ensure that they don’t misuse…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Baeten, X, Balkin, D, & Van den Berghe, L 2011, 'Beyond Agency Theory: A Three-Paradigm Approach to Executive Compensation ', IUP Journal Of Corporate Governance, 10, 4, pp…

    • 4164 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ecco 550 Assignment 1

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain several dimensions of the shareholder-principal conflict with manager agents known as the principal-agent problem. To mitigate agency problems between senior executives and shareholders, should the compensation committee of the board devote more to executive salary and bonus (cash compensation) or more to long-term incentives? Why? What role does each type of pay play in motivating managers?…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the time of FDR the press, the general public, politicians, and academics have questioned the validity of high CEO pay. Following World War II, executive compensation was growing, but at a relatively slow rate of 0.08%, this was up until the mid 1970’s. Then for some reason the growth rate accelerated, increasing by an astounding average of 212% (Frydman and Jenter, 2010). This rapid growth can be traced back to Milton Rock and Edward Hay who brought about “peer groups” as a means of evaluating executive compensation. These peer groups essentially rigged the compensation system where all CEO’s are seen to be above the median, therefor their pay increases continuously (Elson and Ferrere, 2013). Attacks on this excessive executive pay…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The purpose of this report is to review 3 different analyzed employee compensation strategies that could potentially benefit your corporation if accurately executed. As a business you must remember that Employee Compensation is key to identifying as well as rewarding your employees, for their exceptional performance and contributions to the company’s success rate overall. Due to compensation being a significant factor, you must carefully evaluate the three strategies that will be presented in this report. Incorporating a bonus structure is a widely accepted compensation strategy. It provides for an employee who receive a set salary to capitalize their earnings by being rewarded for excellent job performance. Implementing a bonus structure could result in a stable compensation strategy that most employers and all employees are comfortable with. The downside of using this strategy would be having to minimize the ability for growth in annual salary increases, which could result in moral, motivation and productivity decreases. Offering a tuition reimbursement plan is also another popular and well accepted compensation strategy. With this strategy, employees feel as if the company that they invest a minimum of 2080 hours per year cares enough about them to help them pay for a higher education degree. There are many individuals who come to work and give their all with a desire to better themselves. However, due to financial restraints they are unable to. With the implementation of such strategy, you will begin to notice more and more employees pursuing higher education. This overall provides an…

    • 3603 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the focus of our final project, we have identified an issue within one of our team member’s organizations where a mismatch exists between the leadership style of the current Vice President of Human Resources and the environment in which he operates. We will use Fiedler’s contingency theory model as support for our argument. Background: The subject, who will be known as ‘Sam’, was recently hired as the Vice President of Human Resources (VP/HR). He was the favored candidate due to his HR experience, high self efficacy, and charismatic leadership style which enabled him to effectively network with senior executive leaders. In addition to his soft skills, Sam possessed expertise in structuring executive compensation and had extensive work experience with public company compensation committees (which are a subset of the profiled company’s Board of Directors). Executive compensation is a critical component of any public company’s disclosure given the level of scrutiny it receives by the external market and investors alike. With that high level of scrutiny, comes an equally high potential for investor, political, and governmental pushback making the role of VP/HR a crucial one subject to high visibility. Sam’s combination of knowledge, skills, and abilities has allowed him to effectively manage up the corporate chain on matters of executive compensation. However, his position also calls for directing his team in the development and implementation of global compensation and benefits programs for corporate professionals in entry-level, management, and director positions. Current observation and experience of Sam’s team has revealed that his Relationship Motivated leadership style, while effective with senior executives, is ineffectual…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compensation is a deliberate way to deal with giving financial incentive to representatives in return for work performed. Compensation may accomplish a few purposes aiding enrollment, work execution, and occupation fulfillment. A perfect pay administration framework will help you fundamentally support the execution of your representatives and make a more connected with workforce that will go the additional mile for your association. Such a framework ought to be very much characterized and uniform and should apply to all levels of the association as a general framework. With successful Compensation administration you'll likewise appreciate clearer perceivability into singular representative execution when it comes time to settle on basic remuneration…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This debate is about whether or not CEOs deserve their multimillion dollar salaries. According to Kevin J Murphy (professor of finance and business economics), CEO compensation is justified because CEOs increase stock prices which, in turn, increases shareholder wealth. In contrast, Lisa H Newton (professor of philosophy) argues that CEO compensation is not justified due to the large disparity between CEO salaries and the salary of an average worker. She also argues that high CEO salaries "bad stewardship of resources." I will go into detail about both of their arguments in the next couple of paragraphs.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Principal Agent Conflict

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To mitigate agency problems between senior executives and shareholders, the compensation committee should devote more to executive salary and bonuses (cash compensation); dependant on the level of cooperation between the executives and the board.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    compensation management

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages

    establish a logically-designed framework within which equitable, fair and consistent reward policies can be implemented…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Executive Pay Case Study

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Average pay for top American CEOs and board chairmen has soared from $479,000 to $8.1 million in the last quarter century, as measured in annual surveys by Business Week magazine, the only source that goes back that far. The pay of average (non-management) workers over that time, as measured by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, hasn't even kept up with inflation. If average worker pay, which is now $26,899, had risen like CEO pay, it would exceed $184,000. If the minimum wage had risen at the same rate, it would now be almost $45 an hour. In just one generation, the United States has gone through a virtual revolution in what is considered fair pay for top executives…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Executive Compensation

    • 2880 Words
    • 12 Pages

    In 1993, Michael D. Eisner of Walt Disney fame received $203 million as executive compensation. Although this award was inflated by Eisner 's exercise of stock options, many examples of compensation in millions and tens of millions raise questions on how CEOs should be paid. Critics dispute that CEOs are deserving of their pay. CEOs downsize companies or perform badly, yet continue to draw a substantial salary. Unlike low level managers, it seems there is no formula for executive compensation. The disparity between the executive pay in US and that of in other industrialized nations is great, furthering the belief that there is no rational (?) basis for compensation. Among sports and entertainment figures, there exists a feedback mechanism for pay – bad performance leads to reduced earnings. Graef Crystal (c.f Boatright, 2007) argues that executives do not face pay discrimination because directors are bad negotiators [what is the linkage between the directors being poor negotiators and the CEOs not being paid what they are worth? Even if you are writing an abstract – the sentences must convey some meaning.]. It has also been argued that monetary motivation alone will not attract the crème-de-la-crème into corporate management; other occupations demonstrate the provision of stronger intrinsic motivation. In conclusion, the case against high executive compensation is simply because, without establishing pay standards for CEOs, many firms do not punish bad performers nor duly reward good performers.…

    • 2880 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays