Preview

The Primary Cause Of The Russian Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1745 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Primary Cause Of The Russian Civil War
The Russian Civil War
Basic Work Rough Draft

Intro

The primary cause of the Russian Civil War was the breach between the Bolsheviks and non-Bolsheviks. This breach was caused by a number of events, one of them being the Russian Revolution, which occurred throughout 1917. The Russian Revolution consisted of two parts, the first part being the February Revolution, where Tsar Nicholas II was forced out of his position and the Russian monarchy was replaced by a provisional government. Most Russians opposed Tsar Nicholas II’s leadership and lost faith in his abilities since government corruption was widespread and uncontrollable during his reign. Although the people’s opposition against the Russian monarchy was the long term cause of the Russian
…show more content…
This occurred in November of 1917 soon after the February Revolution, which took place in March of 1917. One of Lenin’s first acts as leader was halting Russia’s participation in World War I. In March of 1918, Russia formally ended its participation in World War I with the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. It was signed by the newly Bolshevik government of Russia, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria, and the Ottoman …show more content…
It was made sure that they were completely expelled from the government, and that they would not partake in any organized political activity. Eventually, in September of 1918, the government established a campaigned known as the Red Terror. The Red Terror was a campaign of mass killings, torture, and oppression against people who did not agree with the Bolshevik ruling, the anti-Bolsheviks. It was initiated due to a Socialist Revolutionary attack on Lenin and other Soviet leaders. It is estimated that between 10,000 and one and a half million people were killed during the Red Terror.

It is said that the Russian Civil War officially began in June of 1918, a few months before the Red Terror was established. Among many of the early victims of the war was Tsar Nicholas II, the head of the Russian monarchy before it was overthrown, and his family. Because of the development of anti-Bolshevik troops in Siberia, which was near the area that the former tsar and his family were hiding, the soviets feared that him and his family were going to be freed. In order to prevent this from happening, all members of the family were shot in July of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nicholas II being the last tsar of the Romanov dynasty that lasted for over 300 years, is accountable for the fall of the Romanovs in 1917, however, there are various other reasons too that involved in the ultimate fall of tsarism in Russia in February 1917. While Nicholas’s indecisiveness played a major role in portraying his negligence, the other factors that involved the fall of tsarism were, the declining economic standards and the growth of political opposition along with Nicholas II’s penultimate absence when he was most needed in his country, due to the involvement in the first world war, which was another mistake made by the tsar.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In July 1918, the royal Romanov line was suddenly and brutally ended by the Bolsheviks. The Romanov family had ruled the Russian Empire for over three centuries. The Romanovs reign was one of strict tyranny. Tsar Nicholas II of Russia made one big step toward a more equal Russia by freeing the serfs but because the serfs owned no land they had little to no money still. After WWI when nicholas led Russia to a crushing defeat there was lots of unrest throughout Russia. I think that the main reason the Tsar was forced to abdicate the throne and then was slaughtered is that he made a more equal Russia but in doing so he made the serfs more impoverished than ever, that he had led Russia into multiple wars that had ended badly and that the technology…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Under Czar Nicholas’s rule in World War 1, there were 1,700,000 to 2,254,396 total military deaths and 410,000 civilian deaths. As the head of the Imperial Russian Army, each and every one of these deaths was blamed on Czar Nicholas, the Czar of Russia. The wrath of his people later led to the the Russian Revolution and the end of the Romanov dynasty. Czar Nicholas II was an autocratic and inefficient ruler, which caused political opposition, neglect, and internal rebellions.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the reign of Alexander the lll terror and repression has been widely used as a mean of control. Under the Tsar they were not used as much as their successors but they were used especially with Alexander lll with Russification (Okhrana), and the counter reforms also with Nicholas ll (Okhrana) with bloody Sunday. Under the leadership of Lenin repression and terror persisted with the ‘Red Terror’ campaign (war communism) which consisted of mass arrests and executions ordered by the Bolshevik government and implemented by the Cheka. This idea of control through repression and terror continued in Russia under the leadership of Josef Stalin (OGPU, NKVD, NKGB, MGB). After the death of Stalin, Khrushchev implemented a period of ‘de-Stalinisation’ (KGB) with the aim of ridding the state of its secretive and repressive nature to open up and make allies with the west which was the first time since Alexander ll.…

    • 3481 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 1917 most Russians had lost faith in the leadership of Tsar Nicholas II. The first part of the Russian Revolution of 1917 was Russia's terrible involvement in World War I (1914-1918). Militarily, imperial Russia was no match for industrialized Germany, and the Russian death toll was greater than those sustained by any nation in any previous war. ("History.com"). The February Revolution started March 8, 1917 when rioters rioted for bread took to the streets in the Russian capital of Saint Petersburg. Troops were sent to Saint Petersburg to stop the riots; they opened fire and killed the people. In response to the way the riots were being handled Tsar Nicholas II gave up the throne on March 15. The October Revolution or Bolshevik Revolution was led by Vladimir Lenin who launched a nearly bloodless battle against the ad hoc government ("History."). The Bolsheviks and their allies occupied government buildings and other strategic locations in Saint Petersburg, and soon formed a new government with Lenin as its head; he became the virtual dictator of the first Marxist state in the world.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To what extent was Tsar Nicholas II responsible for the outbreak of the Russian Revolution in 1917…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    LALALA

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tsarism in Russia survived the revolution of 1905 but not that of March 1917 due to the difference in support it had in both years. It faced many difficulties throughout much of its late history; from the assassination of Alexander II and the similar attempts on Alexander III, to the downfall of the Romanov dynasty and the final abdication of Tsar Nicholas II on the 2nd of March. The way the country was being run and the strongly Slavophile views within Russian society made it difficult for any kind of revolt to occur at any time. There were, however, two main revolts against the Tsarist government; these were the 1905 revolution and the March revolution of 1917. The first of these predominantly failed to make any major changes to the government for lack of organisation and coordination of the Tsarist regime’s opponents and the persistently loyal attitude of the armed forces towards The Tsar. The March 1917 revolution, however, resulted in major political revolution and a brand new government due to the impact of the First World War and social and economic discontent within Russian society. The attitudes of the regime’s Liberal opposition greatly varied from 1905 in 1917, and this also played a significant part in pressuring the Tsar Nicholas II to abdicate.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Last of the Romanovs

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The fall of the Romanov Empire changed the face of Russia forever. The royal family, led by Nicholas II, we're imprisoned and eventually assassinated by the Bolsheviks, a political party founded by Vladimir Lenin and Alexander Bogdanov whose main focus was to eliminate the monarchy and employ their own form of democracy. Tsar Nicholas II, his wife, Alexandra, and their only son, Alexei, heir apparent to the throne, were all integral figures in this historical evolution of Russia and its people.…

    • 3074 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Royal Romanov Family

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 1918, the assassination of the Royal Romanov Family brought to an end a three hundred yearlong rule of the Dynasty. It eliminated the hereditary monarchy that Russia had lived under for hundreds of years. Despite the Romanov’s many attempts of reformations that had positive but mostly negative effects on the Russian empire, the royal family were witness to many assassinations, but the monarchy was never at risk of being eliminated. However, the Dynasty saw its last Tsar, namely Nicholas II, and the rest of the royal family assassinated due to the political factors, opposed reforms that were undertaken by the monarch, the Tsar’s weak leadership and the losses brought about by World War One. This brought to an end the reign of the Romanov…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bolshevik victory in the civil war was down to a number of factors. The first being the role of Trotsky, the geographical advantages the Red Army had and the weaknesses of the White Army. Undoubtedly, the most significant was the geographical advantages of the Red Army because this was what secured the equipment to fight and allowed it to be transported.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Russian people wanted the government to change. There had been a dramatic increase in the number of radical newspapers. Therefore, people did not want a conservative reformation, but a radical revolution. They also did not trust the current government, because of many reasons, one of them being Rasputin.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The abject failure of the October Manifesto of 1905 and subsequent Duma was instrumental in the deterioration of the Romanov Dynasty. Introduced in the wake of the events of “Bloody Sunday” protests on the 9th of January, it aimed to please the liberals calling for an adjustment in the running of the government. Much of the Russian population wanted an end to his autocratic ruling, and responded with nine months of demonstrations following the “Bloody Sunday”, which had resulted in over 1000 deaths. Tsar Nicholas II was forced to act when the soviets joined forces in October of that year, meaning that the advocates for change were now united. The introduction of the “October Manifesto” on the 17th of October was an attempt to appease the concerns of the liberals and soviets. The October Manifesto contained the outlines of the creation of a “duma”, an elected parliament with the power to make laws, and gave the right to all men of a certain age to vote. Thus, tsar Nicholas II could no longer be considered an autocrat, and gained support of liberals. However, it failed to address the longer standing issues of peasant poverty, low wages and working conditions, leaving many of the lower class, which made up majority of the population, still opposes the the Tsar. The failure of the Manifesto to include all aspects of Russian society was an example of ineffective…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Russia had lost a lot of territory to Germany and Austria. Generals and the higher class were not reliable in the military and were completely incompetent. There were food riots all over Russia and the troops refused to listen to their superiors. The March Revolution was one of the three revolutions that Russia had during this time period. The Tsar Nicholas the second removed himself from the throne. The Duma, or Parliament of Russia were ignored and held no power up until this point. They took over the government and called themselves the Provisional Government. The Provisional government was set up to make a Democratic constitution and have free elections. Alexander Kerensky was elected president. He believe that the only way to end the war was to have a victorious peaceful ending. The peasants which make up more then half of the population wanted the war to end whether it was victorious or not. They were sick of loosing their sons and stated that they refused to grow crops and make goods as long as the war was still going on. Lenin was the leader of the Bolsheviks, which had about 100,000 members out of the 160 million people in Russia. He went head to head against Kerensky over power and leadership of Russia. In October Lenin got his group together and convinced them to take control of the government. He eventually took over and created the Bolshevik Dictatorship, using military force. The differences of…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By 1917, Russia was chaotic, the government had been thoroughly corrupted, strikes were rampant and all happening at once. The World War I had begun and Russia was having many casualties due to being ill - equipped against industrialized Germany, and amidst the countries it was the one to receive most damage. Due to the german attacks the Russian economy had been falling apart, and such a situation was only useful to the radicals, as they used it as an opportunity to join with the moderates among other forces, in order to overthrow the Czar and achieve their revolutionary goals. As time passed Russia’s situation only deteriorated, demonstrators and protestants took over the streets, the king’s armies killed many of them, but they still continued to attack full force. Then when an army took the protestants side, the tables flipped, Nicholas II, the Czar at the time was forced to abdicate his throne and so freed Russia of over four centuries of Czarist…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causes of the Civil War

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Political War The North and South fought over politics, mainly the idea of slavery. Basically the South wanted and needed it and the North did not want it at all. The South was going to do anything they could to keep it. This was the issue that overshadowed all others. At this time the labor force in the South had about 4 million slaves. These slaves were very valuable to the slaveholding planter class. They were a huge investment to Southerners and if taken away, could mean massive losses to everyone. Slaves were used in the South as helpers in the fields in the cultivation of tobacco, rice, and indigo, as well as many other jobs. The South especially needed more slaves at this time because they were now growing more cotton then ever because of the invention of the cotton gin. Cotton production with slaves jumped from 178,000 bales in 1810 to over 3,841,000 bales in 1860. Within that time period of 50 years the number of slaves also rose from about 1,190,000 to over 4,000,000. The plantation owners in the South could not understand why the North wanted slavery abolished that bad. Southerners compared it with the wage-slave system of the North. They said that the slaves were better cared for then the free factory workers in the North. Southerners said that slave owners provided shelter, food, care, and regulation for a race unable to compete in the modern world without proper training. . But after the American Revolution slavery really died it the North, just as it was becoming more popular in the South. By the time of 1804 seven of the northern most states had abolished slavery. During this time a surge of democratic reform swept the North and West. There were demands for political equality. The South felt these views were not important. All of these views eventually led to an attack on the slavery system in the South, and showed opposition to its spread into whatever new territories that were acquired. Northerners said that…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays