Preview

The Pledge Of Allegiance Should President Woodrow Wilson

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1085 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pledge Of Allegiance Should President Woodrow Wilson
Thesis: The duty to protect and intervene in other counties affairs, militarily if necessary, to protect freedom, liberty and to prevent genocide, ethnic cleansing, and other atrocities is a doctrine to which the United States of America should hold fast to under all circumstances.
Throughout American history, the government has struggled to define the fundamental purpose of U.S foreign policy: whether or not the US should intervene internationally to promote freedom and preserve democracy or to maintain national sovereignty. The international community and the obligation that it holds to preserve peace is a responsibility not to be taken lightly. The commitment to uphold freedom and liberty as stated by our very own Pledge of Allegiance should
…show more content…
On April 2nd, 1917, Wilson makes an address to Congress urging the declaration of war on Germany. Wilson states in his address that America must fight "for the rights of nations great and small and the privilege of men everywhere to choose their way of life and of obedience. The world must be made safe for democracy." Four days after his address the US entered the Great War. Wilson continuously conveys a sense of urgency through his speech, which created an atmosphere of determination to defend amongst the nation. Wilson clarifies, “Our motive will not be revenge or the victorious assertion of the physical might of the nation, but only the vindication of right, of human right, of which we are only a single champion." In his address to persuade Congress to go to war, Wilson attempts to thoroughly explain that his intentions were not to take suggest action on the account of violence, but rather in defense of others. The decision to enter World War One was a judgment call on President Wilson’s part. Though the price of success was not free, his decision led to one of the greatest victories in US …show more content…
President Bush explains on the morning of December 20th, 1989 that the main objective for invasion was “Defending democracy and human rights in Panama.” In the months preceding the invasion and the launch of Operation Just Cause, the US had tried a variety of other tactics to force the dictator Manuel Noriega, out of office. An article published describing the operation states, “When diplomatic and economic pressure did not force the dictator and his cronies from power in 1988, the hope was that a nascent political movement among Panamanians, culminating in the May 1989 elections, would force him out of office (or at least encourage him to leave). It never happened. For the next four months, military planning focused on a gradual buildup of U.S. forces over a period of several months…” To jump into the conflict head first was not the US’s first reaction, which is a common misconceptualized topic. It is a widespread belief that the United States heads into any conflict around the world that arises, when in actuality, the preservation of peace is always the main

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    HIS 105 Assignment 2

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After the Civil War and by the mid-20th century, the United States had become the dominant force in international relations. Some have argued that the United States’ military functions as the world’s “police.”…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On April 2, 1917, President Woodrow Wilson declared war. In previous years to this declaration, Wilson advocated neutrality. In his reelection of 1917, the people who stood with him promoted his presidential candidacy by claiming “He kept us out of war.” Although, Wilson didn’t use this in his own campaign because he knew that entering the First World War would be inevitable. Subsequently, the United States sent the first American Military Force to fight in the European War when German policy of unrestricted warfare threatened Americans at sea, President Wilson saw a chance to not only defend American’s interests, as well as changed the policy of intervention with other countries, but to make the world safe for self-determination. World War One, was a turning point in the United States world affairs in that it was a change in diplomacy of the League of…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the years when the World War I took place Wilson entered his second presidency term. At the beginning he planned to keep United States out of the war but after Germany killed thousands of people and started to attack U.S. merchant ships he changed his view. At that time, President Wilson saw Germany as the enemy. Therefore, he build an army of four million troops and sent half of them to France and that’s when for the first time Wilson reached out to Germany with the message to end the war peacefully without the need of someone to win. He had a vision of self-determination for all nations. Later, he publicized the Fourteen Points to be used as a peace maker. Not only did he come up with peace terms, but he also stated ways to make the…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To go to war? or stay Neutral and quiet? There are many factors leading up to Wilson’s call for action and plea with the congress on getting involved in the war. Woodrow Wilson was one of the last progressive president’s standing. He wanted to improve situations in the country and resolve domestic issues going on.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Operation Just Cause

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Manual Noriega had been directed as the dictator of Panama by US government in 1960’s. The relationship between Noriega and the United States had become strained in the 1980’s because he had been accused of murder, drug trafficking and election fraud by one of his lieutenants. Within in the last two years leading up to Operation Just Cause Noriega succumbed to anti-American rhetoric. During this time, he directed…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Wilson’s main goal before the start of World War I was to not get involved. Practicing isolationism was a difficult task to follow through with though. Intercepting the Zimmerman Telegram from the Germans to the Mexican government changes the perspective of entering into the war. President Wilson’s “He Kept Us Out Of The War” campaign slogan quickly went out the window. Before America just entered into the war, Wilson wanted to make sure he had majority support from the American people. In order to obtain this support, Wilson initiated the use of propaganda into American every day life. The propaganda was meant to get people behind the war, get people to support the war, and also get the people to participate in the war effort. Two posters from the fifth chapter in Discovering The American Past Volume II (7th Edition), that seemed most effective were the “Spies and Lies”…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The speech declared that World War I (specifically the United State’s involvement in it) was being fought for a moral cause (Eaton, 1919). Wilson hoped that by openly announcing this justification for American involvement in the war it would help keep America unlinked from the European nationalistic disputes and ambitions, both during and after the war. Wilson’s Fourteen Points speech was also meant as a preemptive call for peace in Europe after the war ended and was the only explicit statement of war aims by any of the nations that were involved in the active fighting of the war (Unger, 2007). Since it was the only public statement of war aims that was given (as well as being quite fair to every nation involved in the war), it became the basis for the terms of the German surrender at the end of the war. The speech was also widely distributed as an instrument of allied propaganda; copies were dropped behind German lines to encourage the Central Powers to surrender in the expectation of a just settlement (Bowle, 1958).…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The end of Woodrow Wilson’s first term was met with great approval by the American people for avoiding war in Europe. His first term demonstrated a fair and balanced foreign policy. By the end of his term, Wilson knew in the back of his head, that the United States would not be able to evade war in Europe. Several attempts were made by the United States to make peace with foreign nations who were causing problems. As the turbulence developed in Europe, Wilson began making plans to prepare America for war. Although steps during Woodrow Wilson’s presidency could have been made to maintain neutrality, Wilson was more or less forced into the Great War in 1917 by Germany being oblivious and indifferent towards his warnings.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Neutrality In WW1

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Neutrality is no longer feasible or desirable where the peace of the world is involved and the freedom of its peoples, and the menace to that peace and freedom lies in the existence of autocratic governments backed by organized force which is controlled wholly by their will, not by the will of their people. “ President Woodrow Wilson spoke these words to set the tone for the war his country was going to fight in. Wilson had to make this speech for justify his reasoning to enter the current war that was ongoing in Europe. He knew that entering the war would be a the complete opposite of what he campaigned for in his second presidential campaign in 1916. He promised to stay out of the war, and to focus on the issues happening in America, but…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wilson's Fourteen Points was a big cause and objective for the U.S. to enter the war. It called for, among other things, disarmament, self determination, and, most importantly, the League of Nations. Disarmament worked for several years, as the defeated nations of World War I, mostly Germany, sank deeper into dispair. However, with this German misfortune rose Adolf Hitler, who looked promising to the dispaired German people. So he rose a powerful army, which was against disarmament, however, an American-less League of Nations had no power to stop him. The League also sat idol when Mussolini invaded Ethopia in his quest for victory. Self determination was also difficult to enforce, for the victorious nations of World War I were reluctant to give up the land that they captured during the war, or land they obtained by secret treaties. The League of Nations, created as to keep world peace, was powerless and could do nothing without the United States' help. Freedom of the seas was also briefly held, until World War…

    • 283 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The source is a speech delivered by Woodrow Wilson on January 8th 1918; the speech was delivered among Woodrow’s fellow congressmen in the American congress. However, the speech was not written purely by Wilson, During World War I, Walter Lippmann became an adviser to President Woodrow Wilson and assisted in the drafting of the speech. The several points covered in Wilson’s speech aimed to resolve territorial issues in Europe, as well as improving post-war American diplomacy. To achieve this Wilson supported the League of Nations which was set up following the end of war. The speech therefore was not focused purely for American congress, but instead the International stage.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Many presidents of the United States of America have constructed doctrines during their terms in office that have come to define their foreign policy aims, from James Monroe in 1823 right up until the very recent Bush Doctrine. This essay will focus on three of these doctrines, namely the Monroe Doctrine of 1823, the Truman Doctrine of 1947 and the Reagan Doctrine of 1984. Although there are many other presidential doctrines in the history of American foreign policy, several of these, such as Polk’s doctrine in 1845 and the Eisenhower Doctrine of 1957, appear to simply be reiterations of previous presidential doctrines. We will see that, although rhetoric is used quite freely in the president’s announcements of their doctrines, it would be wide of the mark to argue that the doctrines themselves are merely rhetoric. Instead should become clear that the doctrines shaped American foreign policy not only during the doctrine’s author’s term in office, but also for many of his successors.…

    • 4124 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    United States foreign policy has always been characterized by a commitment to free trade, protection of American interests, and a concern for human rights. Our founding fathers, specifically George Washington, are responsible for much of the influence regarding foreign policy after their time period and up to the present day. Washington, in his Farewell Address, warned the country to stay out of permanent foreign entanglements and to stay neutral. The United States stayed faithful to Washington’s warnings for about 125 years. But, when the age of Imperialism hit, the country was forced to intervene to prevent other countries from rising up and becoming world powers. The atrocities of imperialism caused something that America will always regret; The First World War. After the war, the United States’ foreign policy changed from all out intervention to almost complete isolation, similar to what George Washington suggested. After the Second World War, American foreign policy back once again to intervention to try and make the world a better and more peaceful place. In comparison, each foreign policy have nearly no similarities, but a wealth of differences.…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There has been an ongoing debate as to how the United States of America should address and handle the current civil war in Syria. The debate originates from Obama’s frustration in regards to supporting the United States’ current involvement in the issues of the Middle East, and whether or not taking action against al-Assad and his regime would be too costly to our nation. One of the chief criticisms of our great nation is that we act too boldly as the world’s policeman. In our historical involvement and insertion in other nation’s issues, we have developed the reputation of being too dominantly involved in issues that are not our own nor that directly pertain to threats of U.S. national interest. Unfortunately, aspects of international politics and world dynamics are not one dimensional and actions that do not directly affect our nation may indirectly affect our alliances or positions in neighboring parts of the world. There are many factors to consider in approaching the current civil war in Syria; this paper will address the question of what U.S. foreign policy should be towards Syria during this time of internal conflict? I will approach this question by including a brief historical synopsis of the Syrian- U.S. relationship and the current issues in Syria followed by the…

    • 3800 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays