The Philippine Massacre

Topics: Terrorism, Counter-terrorism, Nucleo Operativo Centrale di Sicurezza Pages: 6 (1768 words) Published: June 23, 2013
About: Essay is about a topic on terrorism, it is based on research and on the writer perspective on terror event that is related to world issue. It is written with guideline based on unbiased fair report format accepted by school standards. The Essay is submitted to studymode with the writer intention in sharing ideas and research. Take note that this essay has already been submitted to the school network system which have links to schools worldwide, therefore it cannot be recopied or reproduce.

Writer: M Sharil T

Module: I.S. on World Issue
Theme: Terrorist
Chosen Event: the Philippine massacre

Title: Counter-Terrorism does more harm than benefit for a nation.

Introduction
The Philippine massacre has been dubbed as the worst political killing in Philippine history, speculated to have been spiraled by laws approved by the Philippine government. A law passed to combat domestic terror that has been thought to uncover the blanket of a political power storm. And while we are appalled at the necessity to have a law to counter-terrorism, efforts worldwide have their own laws as a line of defense to combat terrorist. Of course the law that is look upon is the patriot act of the US, enacted right after September 11. No doubt the question on its effectiveness on using the law as a basis of counter- terrorism raises controversy, as one may question of what these laws will impinge upon. The Government argues that these laws are necessary to maintain security in the country. Yet critic has protested that the law has only brought endless problem. Given the negative result after enacting the law on countering terrorism, it is doubtful for the full effectiveness in countering terrorism. Most of the time such law that were passed counters the meaning for counter-terrorism, which is to prevent and counteract terrorism.

“I object violence because when it appears to do good, the good is temporary; the evil that it does is permanent.” Mahatma Gandhi

Despite the funds and efforts to combat terrorism globally, government finds it necessary in enacting laws in their country so as to prevent terrorist attacks. The government feels that the country will be safer with greater homeland security protocol. This is a debatable perspective because the governments still fail to see the underlying cause of terrorism. The underlying reasons that leads ordinary people to aggressive behavior. Although we cannot deny the complexity in dealing the issue of terrorism, we can however point out the exception to this; we can dissect the problem into finding good solution. Enacting such law that was meant to suppress terrorism can be counterproductive as it will benefit political parties that seek to take advantage for their own political agenda. Politics take advantage in the loophole of the law to monopolize for their own personal gain. On the other hand, politics have always had their way to attain political dominance. The executive order that has been enacted by then president of the Arroyo administration enforced in 2006[1], pointed out by the critics, shows that such laws has create more problems than countering terrorism. This gave the political parties to have private armies under the pretext of combating terrorism and preserving national security. Even more concerning is that the funds and equipment meant for counter-terrorism was channel to the governing parties. After the massacre happened, it began to expose the alleged clan abusing their power. Using their power to have a tight grip on the people, the message they try to relay is to instill fear in the people, a proven result of getting a majority of votes. These votes ensure their political status.

“Don’t criticize them; they are just what we would be under similar circumstances.” ― Abraham Lincoln

On a fair note, the government cannot be held totally responsible; things may not always turn out to be the way they are expected to be. Despite the aggressive strategies to...

References: [3] Five worst countries in 2009
International News Safety Institute, Fri, Nov 23, 2012, retrieved 20 November 2012
By Thomas Riegler, Vol 6, No 6 (2012), retrieved 20 November 2012
http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/229/html
Cecil Morella, AFP News, Fri, Nov 23, 2012, retrieved 20 November 2012
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/philippine-massacre-clan-jostling-power-again-082112043.html
State of emergency in Maguindanao stays in place
By Dino Balabo, The Philippine Star, November 23, 2012, retrieved 03 December 2012
ANALYSIS: Philippines: A forbidden country
By Amando Doronila in Manila/Philippine Daily Inquirer | Asia News Network – Fri, Nov 30, 2012
By Mariya Y. Omelicheva, the University of Kansas, Vol 1, No 2 (2007), retrieved 20 November 2012
http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/7/html
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Philippine Politics Essay
  • A Damage Culture is a new Philippines? Essay
  • philippines Essay
  • The Philippines Essay
  • Philippines Essay
  • PHILIPPINES Essay
  • history in philippines Essay
  • Philippines Research Paper

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free