Preview

The October Manifesto

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
372 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The October Manifesto
NOTES * October Manifesto, Duma, Promise of reform * Railway strike, General strike e.g. st p’s, soviet and Trotsky * Army and Police: useful to supress revolution, stays loyal * Promising concessions but fundamental laws. Witte is an economic reformer, not keen on political return. Stolypin he instigates reforms, harsh measures against people who try to overrun the government. He recognised gradual political change needs to happen.
Reform in this instance is, not democracy but adapting to survive.
Both Witte & Stolypin willing to listen to genuine grievances.
Concessions are gradually withdrawn and this is perhaps best seen in the Duma, it’s got limited franchise if the Tsars not happy then the Duma is simply dismissed and replaces. There are 4 different Dumas 1906-1914.
Opposition: Moderates, Revolutionaries (minority) both disunited.
Working Class (Urban) / Peasantry (Rural) after 1905 “Politicised” they’re aware that change is possible and that there are alternatives.
Middle Class: Most of the middle class seek liberal reforms, seek better representation, like a constitutional monarchy. Don’t want to get rid of the Tsar but make them more like ‘us’. (Edward VII)
Democracy. Witte and Stolypin do not want this, nor Nicholas II. He doesn’t have the imagination of the consequences or that change is inevitable. The problem being with the middle class is that they are comparatively smaller to the other opposing parties.
Upper class: Nobles (Land owners) They’re prime concern is the maintenance of the status quo (keeping things the same) Many of the upper class aren’t happy with Witte and Stolypin, think they’re doing to much.

Notes Continued..

By 1911 Witte is no longer on the scene he’s resigned. Stolypin is assassinated. After this the government lacked anyone with the ability, vision etc. to manage change. Any kind of change. Nobody in government that really knows what he’s doing. And Nicholas isn’t really grasping the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Witte’s aim was to make the Russian economy strong enough to maintain Russia’s position as a Great Power. However, Russia did not possess several of the essential factors required to be able to rapidly industrialise like countries such as Germany and Britain were. Firstly, the majority of Russian peasant did not have complete freedom, which meant that the migration of workers to towns and cities in search of work was limited. Also, the Russian economy didn’t have sufficient funds to invest in industrial development, because it could not produce enough surplus grain to raise funding to support industrial development. To combat this, Witte encouraged other countries such as Belgium, France and…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before the revolution, the bourgeoisie, or the wealthier and working part of the middle class, belonged to the Third Estate. The Third Estate, out of the Estates, had the almost no rights and the largest tax burden. However, after the new National Assembly issued the Declaration of the Rights of Man and drafted a new constitution for France, the nobility was eliminated and the bourgeoisie gained a massive amount of political power.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Industrial revolution(1780's) created new technology, bringing wealth and prosperity to the country. However, it also took jobs away from artisans and other skilled workers, leaving them unemployed and resentful. The rapid expansion of the Industrial revolution (1780's) also saw many changes occur in the growth of middle class awareness. With the increase in their wealth and education the middle classes felt that they were poorly represented in parliament as they believed that their status in society should have given them more rights. Previously the affairs of parliament had been the priority of the land owners and aristocracy. They took advantage of the pre-dated and corrupt electoral system to maintain their dominance in politics. Through the use of 'rotten boroughs' and other 'under hand' tactics they ensured that the control of the country remained with them. However, with the advent of the industrial revolution middle class society began to question this previously accepted political structure. They believed that they should have a greater role to play in deciding the political future of the country.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    October 17 (October 30 NS) - The October Manifesto, issued by Tzar Nicholas II, brings an end to the 1905 Russian Revolution by promising civil liberties and an elected parliament (Duma)…

    • 3824 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In A Fierce Discontent, McGerr bequeaths an astounding historical synopsis of the progressive era including subjects as, social action, urbanization, and social reform. Using the once individualistic middle class as his basis for argumentative purposes, McGerr breaks down the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Class relations play a big part in the paperback, focusing on the working class and the immensely wealthy “upper ten” percent. McGerr’s argument was that the progressive movement created a middle class with aspirations for a better democracy, but their ineffectiveness is the soul explanation on the weakness in the political world in the early twentieth century.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the French Revolution, the middle-class – or bourgeoisie – was practically ignored by Louis XVI, who only gave recognition to the aristocracy. As for Tsar Nicholas, he refused to acknowledge the middle-class, whom was called the Duma. The aristocracy enjoyed their place in society and had no problems with the way things were. The Duma, on the other hand, was disgusted with the way Tsar Nicholas ruled. Their discontent, along with the poor people's, were one of the uprisings that led to the Revolution of 1917. This, too, happened in the French Revolution. The bourgeoisie planned and organized until striking at the monarch and setting up their own government. The Duma had set up what was called the Provisional Government on March 12, 1917, which "established equality before law; freedom of religion, speech, and assembly; the right of unions to organize and strike; and the rest of the classic liberal program." The government in which the bourgeoisie had set up was identical. The Provisional Government lasted only a short time before Vladimir Lenin, an extreme socialist, overthrew it, giving this…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the Industrial Revolution, factory workers received little pay, worked long hours, and never saw improvement in their living and working conditions. In the mean time, the middle class was emerging. They were rich because of the enormous amounts of money created in the country because of the Industrial Revolution. Marx thought that the capitalist system would eventually fail. He described communism as “a form of complete socialism in which the means of production--all land, mines, factories, railroads, and businesses—would be owned by the people” (649). He also thought all goods and services should be shared equally.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Late 1800s, Russia was going through stages of economic reforms and developments. Russia faced many problems at the end of the nineteenth century. Under Minister of Finance Ivan Vyshnegradskii there had been famine because of high taxes on consumer goods which had forced peasants to sell more and more grain. The government were slow to act and, although they eventually enforced a ban on grain exports, 350,000 died of starvation or disease. Economically and industrially Russia was also falling far behind many other Western countries at the time, like Britain and Germany. When Count Witte became Minister of Finance in 1893, there was desperate need to decrease inflation, improve infrastructure and encourage foreign investment. I agree with the hypothesis that Witte’s reforms were the most important because of the reforms he put in place to secure the development of capital goods, coal, iron, steel and oil, the building blocks of future economic growth…

    • 793 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Rules America?

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Who Rules America? The Corporate Community and the Upper Class, the author, William Domhoff suggests that the American upper class does not merely exclude other lower social classes from their lives so as to retain their great wealth and power. Instead they have established institutionalized methods of instilling the same values, education and patterned methods of living so that their younger generations will retain the same traditions that older generations have.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are the rich and there are the ones who are not rich: the ones who are in control, and the ones who are subjugated. According to Karl Marx, the “history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” The clashes and conflicts between these people have shaped all of history.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Investigating the first of the long-term factors causing the revolution, it seemed necessary to go back to examine the structure of Tsarist Russia pre-1905 to get a fuller picture. This period posed a problem for Nicholas II. The regime itself reinforced any class divisions from the bureaucracy to the peasants and alienated them even further. As, "the truth is Nicholas was never in touch with the common people. He never knew what it was like to worry where the next meal was coming from. He never had to. " He did not understand the way that Russia worked in practise. He could not, or would not, empathise with the peasants' hardships of the land and his ideas of Russia's troubles were laughable. Consequently, by 1905 he had estranged his subjects, including even some of the gentry' folk that had been so loyal to Tsardom in the past. They were a class in decline and it was partly due to the…

    • 2347 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mr. Peck delivers a compelling article which suggests by force of argument and overwhelming inclusion of supplementary expert opinions, as well as historical facts, that the plutonomy we may be experiencing will come at the expense of the Middle Class—leaving me to ask myself, “… can the middle class be…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discuss the range of groups wanting change in Russia and the ways in which they went about this.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    French Revolution

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In France 94% of the population was in the third class. The Third class was the most poor; they also had to pay the most taxes even though they did not have the money too. Political inequalities played a huge cause of the French Revolution. The Nobles enjoyed privileges that the third estate did not have. Nobles enjoyed a tax free life, freedom and just about everything. This was very unfair too the third estate, their incomes were very low; the money they did earn had to go to the taxes they owed. The third estate basically allowed the Nobles and the King to survive, they supplied all of the recourses too the Nobles and King for free. The government took the third estate for granted and also took advantage over them. Finally the French third estate had enough and overthrew their government.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays