Preview

The Nuremberg Trials: The Greatest Trial In History

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
198 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Nuremberg Trials: The Greatest Trial In History
"The greatest trial in history," as Sir Norman Birkett referred to the Nuremberg Trials, was an attempt to achieve justice for an unprecedented scale of crime. Despite the fact that the legitimate legitimations for the trials and their procedural developments were questionable at the time, the Nuremberg trials are currently viewed as a point of reference toward the foundation of a changeless worldwide court, and an imperative point of reference for managing later occurrences of genocide and different violations against humankind.
After the war, some of those in charge of wrongdoings submitted amid the Holocaust were conveyed to trial, these trials are known as the Nuremberg Trials. The Nuremberg Tribulations were a progression of thirteen tribulations,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Table By Ida Fink: Play Analysis
    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Table By Ida Fink: Play Analysis

    The Second World War began when Germany violated international law and invaded Poland in 1939. When the war began, huge amounts of human rights were violated by the major powers. “The Table,” by Ida Fink is a play that describes the recording of statements given by multiple witnesses on behalf of a war crime that occurred. The prosecutor in charge interviewed 4 people who were present during the crime and took note of their testimony. The interview seemed more like an interrogation, since the prosecutor wanted every detail from that day. Although a work of fiction, the tales of atrocity provided by the witnesses in the play represent the magnitude of brutality the Nazis implemented on civilians.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Nuremburg Trials
    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Nuremburg Trials

    To begin with, it can be used as an example for future similar trials for war crimes. During the trials, a great number of men were executed, arrested, and banished. For example, for other genocides like the Rwanda genocide, the actions that were made during the Nuremburg Trials could act as a baseline for how trials should be held. As proven, the Nuremburg Trials can help by outlining what needs to be done in future trials. Furthermore, after seeing how Germany ended up after the genocide, it could encourage other political leaders to be more careful with their decisions. For example, Stephen Harper realized how wrong the Aboriginal residential schools were, so he publicly apologized for its inhumanity. As shown, the consequences of the Jewish genocide may help prevent anymore crimes against peace in this world. Although Jewish people looked at these trials as a form of justice, it left Germans with a different point of…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Happened To The Romanov Family
    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Happened To The Romanov Family

    2. What were the results of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and what happened to the Romanov family?…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing The Salem Witchcraft Trials And The Nuremberg Trials
    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing The Salem Witchcraft Trials And The Nuremberg Trials

    The trials were a series of military courts, held by the Allied forces of World War II, defendent for the courts were men in the political, military, and economic leadership of the Nazi Germany. The first and best known of these trials was the Trial of the Major War Criminals before the International Military Tribunal, which was aginst 22 of the most important captured leaders of Nazi Germany. It was held from November 20, 1945 to October 1, 1946. The second set of trials of lesser war criminals was conducted under Control Council Law No. 10 at the US Nuremberg Military Tribunals; among them included the Doctors' Trial and the Judges'…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Is The Guilty Of The Trial For Eight Anti-War Experiments
    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page

    What Is The Guilty Of The Trial For Eight Anti-War Experiments

    The trial for eight antiwar activists charged with the responsibility for the violent demonstrations at the August 1968 Democratic National Convention opens in Chicago. The defendants included David Dellinger of the National Mobilization Committee (NMC); Rennie Davis and Thomas Hayden of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS); Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin, founders of the Youth International Party (“Yippies”); Bobby Seale of the Black Panthers; and two lesser known activists, Lee Weiner and John Froines.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Genocide And Holocaust Similarities
    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page

    Genocide And Holocaust Similarities

    Every case of genocide and mass murder has its own story and anotherness, they also didn’t happen in the blink of an eye. The perpetrators of these events have always had a fundamental reason to what led them to execute such gruesome crimes. Most may know, the German holocaust and the Rwandan genocide are the two most known and most terrible violation of human rights because of the amount of people that were killed and the way in which these murders were performed. This essay is a discussion of key similarities and differences of the roles of perpetrators in the two case studies; Rwandan genocide and the German…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Adolf Hitler's Ordinary Men
    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Adolf Hitler's Ordinary Men

    And in fact, many historians have been fairly comfortable to do so. But Christopher Browning’s account of the factors that encouraged regular Germans to take part in Hitler’s hideous plan reveals something of great importance where an event like the Holocaust is concerned. His Ordinary Men seeks to shift perspective away from the notion that those predisposed toward the behavior that perpetrated this greatest of human tragedies were inhuman and accustomed to operating in fashions more sociopathic than militarily appropriate. In doing so, he sets a sizable challenge for himself. Truly, there is no way to address why the German people participated in without elaborating upon some of the most unspeakable acts committed in modern history. To that end, Ordinary Men takes its readers through some difficult narratives that reveal brutal, amoral behaviors that would imply a society impoverished of intellectual, ethical or academic development to that point. Moreover, the base and vile nature of the war crimes committed against a people unprepared to defend themselves and presenting no legitimate antagonism to its aggressor, suggests that the German people themselves were inherently bad people, inclined toward acts of evil and…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    What Lessons in Ethics Did Social Scientists Learn from Milgram and Stanford?
    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages

    What Lessons in Ethics Did Social Scientists Learn from Milgram and Stanford?

    Bibliography: Annas, G. J. (1992). The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press.…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Nuremberg Trials Affect The Future
    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did The Nuremberg Trials Affect The Future

    To begin, the Nuremberg Trials were a series of trials prosecuting and questioning Nazi war criminals. When Hitler came to power, he created laws persecuting Jews and other enemies of Nazi. These laws provoked the death of 6 million European Jews. In response, the allied leaders of Great Britain, the U.S., and the Soviet Union “issued the first joint declaration officially noting the mass murder of European Jewry and resolving to prosecute those responsible for violence against civilian populations,” (United States Holocaust Memorial Museum…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hidden
    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hidden

    The essay “He Would Never Hurt a Fly: War Criminals on Trial in The Hague”…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Ww2 Impact Society
    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did Ww2 Impact Society

    Amidst the various horrors of World War II, none was more devastating then the mass murder and forced labour of Jewish people and other targeted groups by Nazi Germany, in a genocide most often called the Holocaust. In it, more than 11 million lives were claimed, ultimately leading to one of the most devastating war crimes and genocides in the entirety of history. The horrors of the Holocaust and World War 2 in general still greatly impact society today, from Neo-Nazi groups around the world to international relations and to modern culture, as it changed the course of world history.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Trials And Verdicts
    • 785 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Trials And Verdicts

    The constitution is the basis of all criminal law as well as trials and their verdicts. The constitution and the state and federal court systems have been in effect since the nineteenth century. Each and every court case has their own unique processes related to the different courts and how the case made it to any specific one, taking a plea bargain as an alternative to facing trial and what happens to the wrongfully accused will help understand a little more about the ins and outs of trials and verdicts.…

    • 785 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Holocaust War Crimes
    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Holocaust War Crimes

    In order to seek justice for these war crimes, many trials were held. The first declaration officially noting the mass murder of Jews, resolving to prosecute those responsible, was noted on December 17, 1942 by the leaders of the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union (War Crimes Trials). The people responsible for the war crimes were to be sent back to the countries where such crimes haf been committed and judged accordingly to the laws of that nation (War Crimes Trials). Justice was the only reasonable solution to this situation. Many nations which Germany occupied during World War 2 or who collaborated with the Germans in the persecution of certain populations, espically Jews, have also held national trials in the years following World War 2 (War Crimes Trials). The goal of the post war trials was to punish all of the people charged with offenses recognized as crimes in Article 2 of the Control Council of Law no 10 (War Crimes Trials). Due to the heinousness of such crimes, it was vital of authorites to go to such extremes. These post war trials really helped bring peace to many of the victims of the crimes.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Nuremberg Trials
    • 2211 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Nuremberg Trials

    More than half a century has passed since the end of World War Two and to this day it is still difficult to fully understand the severity of what was by far the most destructive war in human history. More than sixty million people were killed during World War Two and more than half of those were innocent town’s people. Among the dead were over six million Jews, which was two thirds of the total living race in Europe at the time. Beyond these general statistics were thousands of stories of crimes committed against soldiers and civilians. These crimes against humanity included cases of prisoners of war being murdered, sent to concentration camps and abuse as well as harmless civilians being rounded up and “exterminated” in death camps. At the end of the war, the Allies (USA, France, Britain, and Russia) felt that the Germans had to be held accountable for their inhumane actions and felt justified to punish the Nazis in an international court of law. On November twentieth, 1945 the Nuremberg trials began where twenty one of the top Nazi leaders where being prosecuted for their crimes during the war. All of the Nazi defendants were considered innocent until proven guilty and were allowed to defend themselves against the charges. Some of the defendants such as Alfred Jodl, Wilhelm Keitel and Hans Frank used the defence that they were just following orders. Other defendants like Karl Doenitz and Albert Speer admitted their actions were wrong. Herman Goering believed his actions were for the greater good of Germany. After researching and gaining the knowledge of the Nuremberg Trials I believe that all six of these Nazi leaders are guilty and I think the judges decided on appropriate sentences for each of the accused. All six of these men helped lead the Germans to commit some of the most brutal crimes the world has ever seen and each of them had to face the consequences of their actions.…

    • 2211 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Trial and Martyrdom ofRizalThe Trial
    • 1424 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Trial and Martyrdom ofRizalThe Trial

    The Trial and Martyrdom of Rizal The Trial of Rizal • An eloquent proof of Spanish injustice and misrule • A mistrial • He was considered guilty before the actual trial • December 26, 1896 – the court martial started at 8:00 am in the Military building known as Cuartel de España. • There are Seven Members of the Military Court: – Lt. Col. Jose Togores Arjona – president – Capt.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More