The Nuremberg Trials

Topics: Nazi Germany, Adolf Hitler, Adolf Eichmann Pages: 5 (1601 words) Published: April 4, 2011
Nuremberg Trials
Andrew Dangler
University of Phoenix

A brief look at the Nuremberg Trials and some of the people involved. It steps upon the problems leading to the start of the trials including three of the doctors, three of the experiments performed on prisoners, and the judgment of three people involved with carrying out the vulgar experiments. Also included are three people who decided to commit suicide instead of facing certain death after going before a jury. The three people who committed suicide were also three of the biggest people involved in building the Nazi party in Germany and its surrounding areas.

The Nuremberg Trials
The Nuremberg Trials, a glimpse into the Nazis’ that committed crimes during WWII, exposes the lives destroyed, and the precedents set forth from this new category of crime, the war criminal. (Brown, 1995) The trials included 24 major political and military leaders who committed crimes against humanity and war crimes, (Congress, 2009) and did so without remorse or emotion for what their victims were going through. It was not until 1945 when the trials began that the full extent of what was truly taking place in the concentration camps and in the extermination camps (death camps) were revealed. The truth about medical experiments, atrocities, crimes against humanity, and membership in a criminal organization were grounds for the Nuremberg trials to commence and would become the precedents for all war crimes that would follow. (Congress, 2009) War crimes are defined as violations of the laws in which a person’s given rights are compromised. In broadest terms, a war crime is any act of violence by military personnel that exceeds the rules of war. (Friedman, 2009) To an extent, the concentration camps were guilty of all violations listed above and it was because of the crimes committed by the leaders in the camps that the Nuremberg trials became a necessity in order to make an example out of the people who committed the crimes. An argument that can be made about the Nuremberg trials is the fact that the crimes against humanity were made, but there was no precedent for war crimes before these trials started. It wasn’t until after the trials that the term crimes against humanity and war crimes became standard in the practice of law in all types of war entanglements. The International Military Tribunal (IMT) consisted of four allied powers including: Great Britain, France, the Soviet Union, and the United States and were responsible for the outcome of every person being tried in the Nuremberg trials. (Cowell, 1995) “The lasting contribution of Nuremberg was to make individuals responsible,” for their genocidal contributions to the war. (Cowell, 1995) By the end of the Nuremberg trials in 1946, there were 12 people convicted and sentenced to death, three were acquitted, and seven were sentenced to prison terms of 10 years to life. Unfortunately, Hitler, Goebbels, and Himmler committed suicide before they could be tried for the crimes they committed. Adolf Hitler was appointed the chancellor of the Nazi party in 1933 and oversaw the murder of over 17 million civilians with an estimated six million Jews in what is known as the Holocaust, but Hitler took his life just days before the allied forces took Germany by force. (Farmer, 2007) Paul Joseph Goebbels was one of Hitler’s closest associates and took over the position of Chancellor of Germany for just one day after Hitler committed suicide. Goebbels committed suicide just a day before Germany was taken by allied forces. It was not until after Goebbels and his wife took their six children’s lives that they finally took their own lives. (Reich, 2009) Heinrich Himmler was the head of the Gestapo and the organizer of the mass murders of Jews in the extermination camps during Hitler’s reign and took poison to commit suicide after he was discovered wearing a disguise and fell into British hands after...

References: Brown, P. (1995, 11). Nuremberg Remembered. Contemporary Review , p. 257(4).
Bulow, L. (2009). Auschwitz: Gate To Hell. Retrieved 8 19, 2009, from Auschwitz, Nazi Death Camp:
College, T. P. (2003). Introduction to NMT Case #2 U.S.A. vs. Erhard Milch. Retrieved 8 17, 2009, from
Harvard Law School Library:
Congress, L. O. (2009, 7 29). Nuremberg Trials. Retrieved 8 5, 2009, from Military Legal Resources:
Cowell, A. (1995, 11 20). Nuremberg Journal. Retrieved 8 17, 2009, from Literature of the Holocaust:
Farmer, A. (2007). Hitler and the Holocaust. History Review , pp. 3 -9.
Friedman, L. (2009). War Crimes Without A Formal War. Retrieved 8 18, 2009, from War-Crimes:
Meltzer, B. D. (2002). The Nuremberg Trial: A Prosecutor 's Perspective. Journal of Genocide Research ,
Podgers, J. (1993). Remembering Nuremberg. American Bar Association (ABA Journal) , pp. 88 - 92.
Reich, T. (2009, 7 13). Joseph Goebbels. Retrieved 8 17, 2009, from Who 's Who in Nazi Germany:
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Nuremberg Trials Essay
  • What was the Nuremberg Trials about? Essay
  • Nuremberg trials Essay
  • Nuremberg Essay
  • The Influence of the Nuremberg Trials on International Law Essay
  • Essay on Nuremburg Trials
  • Nuremberg Trial Justice Essay
  • The Nuremberg Trials Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free