One conflict in the book “The Most Dangerous Game” was when Rainsford was upset at General Zaroff. Rainsford was upset because General Zaroff was killing people. General Zaroff was killing innocent people, sailors. Rainsford said “Killing animals is one thing, killing people is another”. General Zaroff would agree to the fact that what he was doing was wrong. “Life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and if needed to be taken by the strong” said General Zaroff. The General also said “I am strong, how should I not use my gift? If I wish to hunt …show more content…
Both at the end of the book and the film they were considering becoming friends. “If my men come before yours, i'm telling them to help you up first.” They probably didn't have anyone coming for one another. He tried to weaken him up so that the other character would have thought they were now friends and not enemies. They hated each other. “So you're not killed, as you ought to be, but you're caught.” He was going to kill him when and if he got out before one another. He would've killed him due to their families being enemies for a long time, but then they changed their minds and they seemed like they wanted to have some sort of friendship. This can happen in real life when writing. The language in your writing, the film can also be connected with real life as vision