Preview

The Mansabdari System in the Mughal Dynasty

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3338 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Mansabdari System in the Mughal Dynasty
MANSABDARI SYSTEM IN MUGHAL DYNASTY Mansab was the generic term for the military type grading of all imperial officials of the Mughal empire.The mansabdars governed the empire and commanded its armies in the emperor’s name.The term is derived from Mansab, meaning rank.Hence,Mansabdari literally means rank-holder.Basically,the mansabdar system was borrowed from Persia.It was prevalent during the reign of Babur and Humayun.Mansabdar was a title used in the armed services of the Mughal empire.The term is derived from Mansab, standing for rank,mansabdar literally means a rank holder in military.A mansabdar was engaged in the service of the state and was obligated to render service.The mansabdars formed a military aristocracy which proved an admirable instant in the organization of Chengiz and Timur. The“ mansab” meant rank.Different numbers which could be divided by ten were used for ranking officers.It was also meant for fixing the salaries and allowances of officers.Since,the mansabdars of the mughal empire received their pay either in cash(naqd) or in the form of assignments of areas of land(jagir) from which they were entitled to collect the land revenue and all other taxes sanctioned by the emperor,the mansabdar system was also an integrated part of the agrarian and the jagirdari system. This system introduced by Akbar .It was a unique feature of the administrative system of the Mughal Empire.The term mansab (i.e.officer,position,rank)in the mughal administrative indicated the rank of its holder(mansabdar) in the official hierarchy.It was of central Asian origin.According to one view Babur brought it to North India.
DEVELOPMENT OF MANSABDARI SYSTEM-
During the reign of Akbar, the lowest rank was that of number ten and the highest was that of twelve thousand.The mansab above five thousand and later on that of seven thousand was given only to princes of royal blood.Jahangir and Shahjahan awarded mansab to their officers upto the number



References: 1.The Evolution of the Mansab System under Akbar until 1596-7-SHIREEN MOOSVI. 2.Rank Mansab in the Mogul State Service-W.H.MORELAND. 3.Medieval India(1526-1761)-SATISH CHANDRA. 4.Medieval India(750-1540)-HARISHCHANDRA VERMA.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gunpowder Empires Dbq

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Great leadership early on in the Muslim empires helped maintain dominance.According to Ogier Ghiselin de Busbecq,Suleiman the Magnificent,who was the Ottoman Sultan from 1520-1560 ,chose leaders and high ranked officials based on how their work ethics are."Those who receive the highest offices from the Sultan...do not believe that high qualities are either natural or hereditary... but are partly a gift of God,and are partly result of good training..."Which shows that the empires chose leaders and high ranked officials are chosen very strictly ,which led to great leaders in the dynasties.(Doc.3) Abdul ul-Qadir Bada' uni was a Muslim cleric who wrote about how the emperor Akbar the Great,Mughal ruler from 1556 CE to 1605 CE, who further educated himself from different perspectives,from Brahmans,Priest,Buddhist monks and many…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 26 Vocab

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4. Vizier: Ottoman equivalent of the Abbasid wazir; head of the Ottoman bureaucracy; after 15th century often more powerful than sultan.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    AP World EMPIRE DBQ

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Document 1: SAFAVID “great liking for warfare and weapons of war…fine soldier and very skilled, and his men so dexterous—use of muskets””realm extended and soldiers receive pay all year” Paul Simon, missionary to Safavid Court of Shah Abbas The Great in the city of Isfaha, 1605—visitor to Safavid court, therefore perhaps biased in treatment of soldiers and mencourt has only the best of the best. Plus biased towards Europe, therefore men are “little behind our men in Europe.”  success of the empire was its treatment of the recruited slave youth into the army and bureaucracybackbone of army and loyal to Abbas I.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    his true skills since he had been now promoted to commanding four different Corps in the…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap World Ch 20

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aurangzeb – son and successor of Shah Jahan in Mughal India; determined to extend Muslim control over whole of subcontinent; wished to purify Islam of Hindu influences; incessant warfare exhausted empire despite military successes; died in 1707…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    power a person had in the military, for example a person could be a captain of ten, a captain of a…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If loss of egalitarian values were a detrimental factor in the formation of river valley then the scale of hierarchy, patriarchy, and monarchy in the second wave empires could be considered ruinous. This unfair treatment of human beings was an unfortunate trait that both civilizations and empires shared. Hierarchies of class came about as one of the major turning points of human history in the first civilizations though unequal distribution of wealth and resources, ant were solidified by laws that kept them in place. In Mesopotamia, the Code of Hammurabi declared that if a commoner was strike to a man of his rank he would only have to pay a small fine, but if he dared to touch a man of a senior rank he would be reprimanded severely by being publicly whipped. Likewise, class differences played an important role in second-wave civilizations. In the Mauryan and Gupta empires, the caste system was an indicator of spiritual development, one 's position, and whether or not they were pure. Additionally, under Qin and Han dynasties there was sever class hierarchy with dominance of bureaucratic elites which gave rise to peasant rebellions. Patriarchy was also present in both river-valley societies and second wave empires. What started out as men and women playing equal roles in society soon turned to women staying at home and taking care of children while men went out to farm and fight in wars. This led to ideology that men were to be regarded as higher than women in society. Evidence of this can also be observed in Mesopotamian laws which dictated that men could hold certain privileges while women could not, such as being considered as a victim of rape. This way of thinking can also be found in Roman society. Centuries of empire building and warfare led to idea that a man could hold absolute control over his wife and had the right to kill her…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mughal and Safavid were a few of the strongest empires in their time. These empires shared many similarities, but one major similarity is their political structures. The Safavid and Mughal both had a centralized government, based on military conquest, and were both Muslim based empires. But like many things these two empires do have differences, they were both in different regions, overall population was different, and the branch of Islam they followed was separate.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Safavid, Mughal, and Ottoman empires all depended in some way on the allegiance of non-Muslims to the empire. The Ottoman emperors were kinder on their conquered people, and the main separation between Muslims and non-Muslims in the empire was the tax on the dhimmis (non-Muslims). The Safavid leaders were more forceful in this regard. They imposed on subjects to convert to Islam unless they were an asset in trading with Europe. However, the leaders of the Mughal Empire, starting with Akbar, were far more just and understanding toward conquered people (mainly the Hindu population) in northern India.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ottoman and Mughal empires were two of the greatest and most successful empires to ever form in history. However, they both had some similarities as well as differences. Both empires went through tough periods of time, but at some point they also went through times of growth and prosperity. Although the Ottoman and Mughal Empire both did not force conversions into Islam, the Ottoman’s development relied on their tough military force, while the decline of the Mughal Empire was caused by Aurangzeb’s policy of religious persecution and high taxes.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socially, the Ottoman Turks were each millet, or a nation, inside the empire and had separate social customs in accordance with the religion of the millet. Muslim women had harsh restrictions as with Islamic law, but the non-Muslim women were subject to separate laws. Even Muslim women had more rights than in other Muslim nations. In the Safavid empire socially, they were a mixed society just like the Ottoman empire. The aristocrats had limited power and influence. They were also Turkic-speaking tribal groups. In the Mughal empire socially, were Hindu population. They had been threatened by the ruling Muslims. Akbar, who was originally a Muslim gave the Hindu more rights.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People were given sila based on their social ranking. Senior officials received the most. Ladies of the…

    • 1445 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical India had a very complex system of hierarchy known as the caste system. The caste system developed during the Vedic and Epic ages and became steadily more complex as a way of dividing people into social classes. The caste system was racially based, so a person was born into a caste, or jati, with no way of changing his or her status individually. Whole jatis could raise their social standing, but violating rules…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mandan believed that all natural objects had a spirit, including plants, trees, rocks, rivers etc. For example according to source C, “The Mandan was the most complex; a four-day ritual requiring lengthy preparation and self-sacrifice by participants, it was an elaboration of the Sun Dance common to many Plains tribes”. This shows that the Mandan were very devoted to their religion and took it really seriously. This also shows that they devoted a lot of their time to Animism and practiced it throughout their lives. The Mandan men and women all had certain roles within their society. Men were the ones who went to war, and went on long hunts to get food for their families. The women farmed and stayed at home to take care out their children. For example according to source A, “Mandan men were hunters and sometimes went to war to protect their families. Mandan women were farmers and also did most of the child care and cooking. Only men became Mandan chiefs, but both genders took part in storytelling, artwork and music, and traditional medicine”. This shows that the Mandan people all had certain duties in the village and they all played a part in society. This also shows that they followed their rolls and made sure their work was done. All in all the beliefs of the Mandan tribe were very unique and they all had a role to play in their house and in the…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ottomans and the Mughals are two of the greatest and most powerful civilizations of the modern period. Their moments of glory in the sixteenth century represent high points in human creativity and art. They built empires, which were the largest and most influential of the Muslim empires of the modern period, and their culture and military influence extended into Europe. Most of the triumphant moments of the two empires came during the reigns of Suleyman I the Magnificent in Ottoman Empire and Akbar the great Mughal. Just as the reigns of these two leaders marked highpoints in the growth of their empires, their deaths marked starting points for the decline of their great empires.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics