Preview

The Lost Amendment Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
585 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Lost Amendment Essay
The Lost Amendment Although the Second Amendment was adopted in 1791 there are still two different interpretations to whether the amendment refers to all individual rights to bear arms or strictly the right to bear arms when forming militias. The Second Amendment is an amendment that is a part of the first ten amendments that are referred to as the Bill of Rights. Adopted in 1791 these amendments protect the citizens from the gov’t in order to prevent a tyrannical gov’t. The New Yorker article calls the second amendment “The Lost Amendment” because of the very little attention it has received ever since it was adopted and also suggest that this is because the arguments that are used when dealing with this are bad. One interpretation says that the second amendment is only referring to the right to bear arms when forming militias to defend against tyranny while the other interpretation argues that the second amendment refers to individual rights to bear arms for everyone. The language used in the second amendment has a lot to do with the different interpretations as it reads, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”. The first part, “A well …show more content…
Another point one of the debaters points out is the language used that plainly states that individuals can have guns. On the other hand some of the debaters say the Second Amendment was referring to only people who had an intention of forming a militia for common self-defense and permitting them to have guns. They argue that the whole purpose was to prevent tyranny and to allow the states to create militias to fight the gov’t with if

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Second Amendment Essay

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the most highly debated amendments of the United States Constitution is the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment has been disputed for hundreds of years on exactly of its exact true meaning. The United States Constitution wrote the Second Amendment as “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Kasich Pros And Cons

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (source 4). The second amendment is most important because it allows the people to intervene if the government is performing tyranny. If we the people were deprived of this right that means that we would be giving up our freedom to fight against…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Steve Rusiecki (A local police officer in his area). In this process, Richard talks about the Second Amendment, which is a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed; and the reasons for the second amendment. The Founding Fathers included this in our Bill of Rights because they feared that the Federal Government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation and as individuals.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today, especially after the Connecticut shooting, there is an argument over the right to bear arms. One portion of the argument focuses on whether or not people even have this right. As stated by Michael Sommers, the second amendment reads: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” (Sommers 42) When the second amendment was written and passed, there was no professional army, only a civilian…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    No other amendments in the United States Constitution has caused as much controversy as the Second Amendment. The amendment states that the people of America are allowed to bare arms and maintain a well regulated militia. This has caused a lot of controversy and issues with gun control in recent years. The Second Amendment should be amended in order to have more rules, regulations, and provide a safer America for people. People in favor of guns suggest that there is a need for guns for all citizens to protect people from the government. However, violence is a large issue today with guns and weapons. The Founding Father’s were building America with a more liberal perspective that envisioned a free society where individuals protected their own property and person with minimal interference from the government. In today’s society America has built a stronger military and police force where people do not need as many weapons in their homes with such high power.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 2nd Amendment in the United States Constitution written in 1971 states, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Many gun control proponents believe that it means the military and law enforcement agencies should be the only ones to own guns. As I read it, it clearly says, "The people to keep and bear arms" meaning…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the historical aspects of the government of United States, there has been one addition to the political aspect that is considered as one of the most controversial and debated; the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment was established on December 15, 1791 with nine other to the United States’ Constitution. It was proposed by James Madison soon after the Constitution was ratified in sought of more power to the state militias. (Brooks). This Amendment also served an important factor between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. It was a form of compromise between the two groups as to who should have more power. The Amendment states, “ A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The 2nd Amendment, The right to bear arms was first passed on September 25, 1789 and then it was included to the 10 Bill of Rights on December 15, 1791. The need of the second amendment was for the security of our States. James Madison introduced the second amendment as an opinion to provide more power to the militias.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is quite telling that one of the first conditions the founders made a point of spelling out in the document, was the right of the individual to bear arms. The second amendment does not stipulate the types or numbers of firearms. It can be assumed that was because at the time of the framing of the Constitution, there were not many different types of firearms in existance. But it does have some fail-safes in place to allow the government the ability to place limits on the manufacture, ownership, and sale of…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The wording in the Bill of Rights supports citizens in having the individual right to bear arms. The Second Amendment includes the term “the right of the people” which is used frequently throughout the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, and most commonly indirectly refers to individual rights. The Second Amendment also references pre-existing individual rights with the statement of “shall not be infringed” which is a possible reference to the 1689 English Bill of Rights in which English citizens were allowed to bear arms (French 2-3). Individual liberties granted to citizens are directly stated in neither the Bill of Rights nor the Constitution. The controversy on whether the Second Amendment was meant to be a collective right is eliminated with the analyzation of the wording presented in the Bill of Rights, thus, stripping the Second Amendment would be a violation of individual…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America recently witnessed their largest mass-shooting in Orlando, Florida; which brought up many arguments over whether not America needs more laws restricting the use and ownership of firearms. Liberals have been arguing the Second Amendment does not grant citizens the right to bear arms, only militias. Another controversy would be that additional gun control laws are necessary to prevent gun violence. Conservatives believe in the opposite, and often argue the Founding Fathers made the Second Amendment so citizens may use guns for self-defense. Although many believed the Second Amendment does not grant citizens the right to bear arms, our Founders wrote the Constitution and viewed it as “a natural right, given by God and not to be impaired…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, public debates have been less focused on the safety and wellbeing of our youth and kids. Instead, the debate has been heavily focused on the meaning of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the proper use of guns by the adults. The Second Amendment reads, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Gun Control

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The second amendment of the Constitution says, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Analysis of this clause varies depending on how one wants to interpret. For example, someone who views the amendment with the original intent of the framers’ might view the amendment as the states being able to rise up against the possibility of tyranny. If the president dispersed Congress and take away the State’s voice and choice to pass their own laws, that would be tyranny, and a state militia would be able to rise up against it with the weapons they were allowed to have. To a person who wants to read it as the amendment is written, the right to own guns should not be infringed because citizens need a well-regulated militia to protect our liberties. The difference is that the protection against tyranny is not implied in this belief. Critics believe that the Constitution should be read and interpreted as Americans now. To which, a well regulated militia is not what citizens have. Even though citizens can have certain high powered and high magazine…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Second Amendment and the right to bear arms has always been a part of American culture and history, the right to bear arms is as American as apple pie and westerns, but it has and always will be a hot topic and the wording and meaning of the Second Amendment comes into question frequently. The currently accepted meaning of the Second Amendment is that it gives militias and individuals the right to bear arms, the right to own firearms (“Second Amendment to the United States Constitution”). However even though the right to bear arms is given to every American it can be revoked, many states have sensible laws that restrict where you can take a firearm and who can own them, and many Americans support these restrictions even though they technically…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Amendment Debate

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Under the Constitution, the fundamental laws of the United States by which the people and states must abide by, we hold to our amendments; however, like most things, some amendments are under scrutiny, as they can be such a controversial topic. One such controversial topic would be our Second Amendment under the Bill of Rights of the Constitution, wherein resides our first ten basic, natural rights, which are guaranteed to citizens of the United States. As stated by the Second Amendment of the United States: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed,” ensures that this natural right of the citizens to possess and bear arms shall not be infringed…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays