The Leadership Quarterly 17 (2006) 559 – 576 www.elsevier.com/locate/leaqua
Leadership and the organizational context: Like the weather? ☆ Lyman W. Porter ⁎, Grace B. McLaughlin 1
The Paul Merage School of Business, University of California–Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697-3125, USA
Abstract This article reviews the leadership literature from 1990–2005 in twenty-one major journals in order to determine the nature and extent of attention to the organizational context as a factor affecting leaders' behavior and their effectiveness. Both conceptual and empirical articles were rated as having “moderate/strong,” “slight,” or “no” emphasis on the organizational context. Those articles classified in the moderate/strong category were analyzed under seven organizational context components. Suggestions are included for improving the breadth and depth of empirical knowledge about the interaction of leadership and the organizational context. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Leadership; Organizational context
1. Introduction In the past 15 years or so, there have been increasing calls in the literature for the necessity to give more attention to the role of the organizational context as a major factor affecting leadership behavior and outcomes. Consistent with those calls, the basic premise of this article is: Leadership in organizations does not take place in a vacuum. It takes place in organizational contexts. The key issue, therefore, is whether, and to what extent, the organizational context has been front and center in recent leadership literature. That is, does a relative void still exist in the research literature on the impact of the organizational context on leadership? If it does, the situation would seem to be like the weather: many talking about it, but very few doing much about it insofar as empirical research is concerned. Progress in filling this void, to the extent that it exists, would seem to be essential for a better understanding of leadership phenomena. In the field of organizational behavior generally, there has been a relative lack of attention to how the larger organization context affects specific areas of individual and group behavior. These areas would include, among others, motivation, communication, teams, and, as emphasized here, leadership. The need for more focus and research on the
☆ The authors would like to thank Tassaporn (Pam) Kietikajorn, Simon He, James Thompson, and Yearly Review Editor, Jerry Hunt, for their valuable assistance on this project. ⁎ Corresponding author. Paul Merage School of Management, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. Tel.: +1 949 644 5358. E-mail addresses: firstname.lastname@example.org (L.W. Porter), email@example.com (G.B. McLaughlin). 1 Tel.: +1 949 824 4945.
1048-9843/$ - see front matter © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.002
L.W. Porter, G.B. McLaughlin / The Leadership Quarterly 17 (2006) 559–576
organizational context in the OB field was noted by Mowday and Sutton in their 1993 Annual Review of Psychology chapter on “organizational behavior”: We believe the field [of organizational behavior] needs to return to a focus on organizational phenomena. This effort will be aided by the immersion of researchers in organizational contexts. It may also move the field in useful directions that will counter the common criticism that much organizational behavior research is irrelevant to the well-being of organizations and their members. (Mowday & Sutton, 1993, p. 225). Likewise, Porter in an article in 1996 stated: Probably the most significant failure of micro-OB…is that we have tended to ignore the “O” in our studies of micro phenomena. We clearly have emphasized the “B,”…but we have by and large been remiss in considering organizations as critical contexts affecting the behavior occurring in them… We have given too little attention to the internal, organizational environment affecting behavior (Porter,...
References: Antonakis, J., & Atwater, L. (2002). Leader distance: A review and a proposed theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 673−704. Antonakis, J., Schriesheim, C. A., Donovan, J. A., Gopalakrishna-Pillai, K., Pellegrini, E. K., & Rossomme, J. L. (2004). Methods for studying leadership. In J. Antonakis, A. R. Cianciolo, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 48−70). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1995). Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 199−218. Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S., & Dodge, G. E. (2000). E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 615−668. Balkundi, P., & Kilduff, M. (2005). The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 941−961. Bess, J. L., & Goldman, P. (2001). Leadership ambiguity in universities and K-12 schools and the limits of contemporary leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 419−450. Boal, K. B., & Hooijberg, R. (2000). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 515−549. Brown, M. E., & Gioia, D. A. (2002). Making things click: Distributive leadership in an online division of an offline organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 397−419. Choi, Y., & Mai-Dalton, R. R. (1998). On the leadership function of self-sacrifice. The Leadership Quarterly, 9, 475−501. Cliff, J. E., Langton, N., & Aldrich, H. E. (2005). Walking the talk? Gendered rhetoric vs. action in small firms. Organization studies, Vol. 26. (pp. 63−91): Sage Publications Inc. Davis, W. D., & Gardner, W. L. (2004). Perceptions of politics and organizational cynicism: An attributional and leader–member exchange perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 439−465. de Hoogh, A. H. B., den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., Thierry, H., van den Berg, P. T., van der Weide, J. G., et al. (2005). Leader motives, charismatic leadership, and subordinates ' work attitude in the profit and voluntary sector. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 17−38. Denis, J. -L., Lamothe, L., & Langley, A. (2001). The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 809−837. Denis, J. -L., Langley, A., & Cazale, L. (1996). Leadership and strategic change under ambiguity. Organization studies, Vol. 17. (pp. 673): Walter de Gruyter GmbH and Co. KG. Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native 's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review, 21, 619−654. Eggleston, K. K., & Bhagat, R. S. (1993). Organizational contexts and contingent leadership roles: A theoretical exploration. Human Relations, 46, 1177−1192. Egri, C. P., & Frost, P. J. (1994). Leadership for environmental and social change. The Leadership Quarterly, 5, 195−200. Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit-level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57, 61−94. Elron, E. (1997). Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity. The Leadership Quarterly, 8, 393−412. Gargiulo, M. (1993). Two-step leverage: Managing constraint in organizational politics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 1−19. Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. Academy of Management Review, 10, 601−616. Green, S. G., Anderson, S. E., & Shivers, S. L. (1996). Demographic and organizational influences on leader–member exchange and related work attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66, 203−214. Groves, K. S. (2005). Linking leader skills, follower attitudes, and contextual variables via an integrated model of charismatic leadership. Journal of Management, 31, 255−277.
L.W. Porter, G.B. McLaughlin / The Leadership Quarterly 17 (2006) 559–576
Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30, 269−287. Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2005). Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30, 472−491. Hooijberg, R., & DiTomaso, N. (1996). Leadership in and of demographically diverse organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 7, 1−19. Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 891−902. Howell, J. M., & Hall-Merenda, K. E. (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader–member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 680−694. Howell, J. M., Neufeld, D. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2005). Examining the relationship of leadership and physical distance with business unit performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 273−285. Hunt, J. G., Boal, K. B., & Dodge, G. E. (1999). The effects of visionary and crisis-responsive charisma on followers: An experimental examination of two kinds of charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 423−448. Hunt, J. G., Boal, K. B., & Sorenson, R. L. (1990). Top management leadership: Inside the black box. The Leadership Quarterly, 1, 41−65. Hunt, J. G., & Ropo, A. (1995). Multi-level leadership: Grounded theory and mainstream theory applied to the case of General Motors. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 379−412. Jeffrey, A. A., Mary, L. F., & Michael, T. H. (1993). Leadership instability in hospitals: The influence of Board–CEO relations and organizational growth and decline. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 74−99. Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386−408. Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 525−544. Karakowsky, L., & Siegel, J. P. (1999). The effects of proportional representation and gender orientation of the task on emergent leadership behavior in mixed-gender work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 620−631. Keller, R. T. (1992). Transformational leadership and the performance of research and development project groups. Journal of Management, 18, 489. Klein, K. J., & House, R. J. (1995). On fire: Charismatic leadership and levels of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 183−198. Lucas, J. W. (2003). Status processes and the institutionalization of women as leaders. American Sociological Review, 68, 464−480. Maitlis, S. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 21−49. Marta, S., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Leadership skills and the group performance: Situational demands, behavioral requirements, and planning. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 97−120. Mayo, M., Pastor, J. C., & Meindl, J. R. (1996). The effects of group heterogeneity on the self-perceived efficacy of group leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 7, 265−284. Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 403−419. Mowday, R. T., & Sutton, R. I. (1993). Organizational behavior: Linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 195. Mumford, M. D., Marks, M. A., Connelly, M. S., Zaccaro, S. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2000). Development of leadership skills: Experience and timing. The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 87−114. Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705−750. Osborn, R. N., Hunt, J. G., & Jauch, L. R. (2002). Toward a contextual theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 797−837. Pastor, J. -C., Meindl, J. R., & Mayo, M. C. (2002). A network effects model of charisma attributions. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 410−420. Pawar, B. S., & Eastman, K. K. (1997). The nature and implications of contextual influences on transformational leadership: A conceptual examination. Academy of Management Review, 22, 80−109. Porter, L. W. (1996). Forty years of organization studies: Reflections from a micro perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 262−269. Rousseau, D. M., & Fried, Y. (2001). Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 1−13. Scandura, T. A., & Lankau, M. J. (1996). Developing diverse leaders: A leader–member exchange approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 7, 243−263. Schneider, B., Brief, A. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1996). Creating a climate and culture for sustainable organizational change. Organizational Dynamics, 24(4), 6−19. Scully, J. A., Sims, J. H. P., Olian, J. D., Schnell, E. R., & Smith, K. A. (1994). Tough times make tough bosses: A meso analysis of CEO leader behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 5, 59−83. Shamir, B., & Howell, J. M. (1999). Organizational and contextual influences on the emergence and effectiveness of charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 10, 257−283. Smith, P. B., Wang, Z. M., & Leung, K. (1997). Leadership, decision-making and cultural context: Event management within Chinese joint ventures. The Leadership Quarterly, 8, 413−431. Tosi, H. L. (1991). The organization as a context for leadership theory: A multilevel approach. The Leadership Quarterly, 2, 205−228. Trice, H. M., & Beyer, J. M. (1991). Cultural leadership in organizations. Organization Science, 2, 149. Tyler, T. R., & De Cremer, D. (2005). Process-based leadership: Fair procedures and reactions to organizational change. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 529−545. Waldman, D. A. (1993). A theoretical consideration of leadership and total quality management. The Leadership Quarterly, 4, 65−79. Waldman, D. A., Lituchy, T., Gopalakrishnan, M., Laframboise, K., Galperin, B., & Kaltsounakis, Z. (1998). A qualitative analysis of leadership and quality improvement. The Leadership Quarterly, 9, 177−201.
L.W. Porter, G.B. McLaughlin / The Leadership Quarterly 17 (2006) 559–576
Whittington, J. L., Goodwin, V. L., & Murray, B. (2004). Transformational leadership, goal difficulty, and job design: Independent and interactive effects on employee outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 593−606. Yagil, D. (1998). Charismatic leadership and organizational hierarchy: Attribution of charisma to close and distant leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 9, 161−176. Zhu, W., Chew, I. K. H., & Spangler, W. D. (2005). CEO transformational leadership and organizational outcomes: The mediating role of humancapital-enhancing human resource management. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 39−52.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document