Preview

The Lawsuit: Examining the Characters

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1629 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Lawsuit: Examining the Characters
Casey Oram

4 March 2011

English 1020

Essay 1

The Lawsuit: Examining the Characters

The definition of a lawsuit is a civil action brought in court in which a plaintiff demands another person, known as the defendant, pay this person equitable resolve (dictionary.com). In other words they want payment for being wronged in the past. If the case is found to be legitimate and proven justifiable, the defendant pays the plaintiff the awarded compensation. This brings us to the story, The Lawsuit, by Naguib Mahfouz. This tale is about a son being sued by his father’s widow demanding maintenance be paid to her some twenty years after the father’s death. Several of the individuals in this story serve very little purpose. These characters, known as flat characters, are used in a fictional role, in which they do not experience considerable change or growth throughout the course of the story (Wiehardt). Other characters, called round characters, supply the story with an individual who encounters controversy and is changed by it in some way (Wiehardt). They tend to play a larger role and are more fully described in the creative writing helping the story take shape. The round characters justify their roles to the reader by being complex and showing change throughout the course of the story. They help the story tell its tale, offering details.

One of the flat or static characters in this short story is the sisters, only briefly mentioned during the announcement of the new marriage and again when the father died. They did not seem to serve as main characters and were not affected much in this story, possibly because they had moved into their own homes and did not live with the other family members. The mother, another of the flat characters, seemed content about the current new arrangement. She appears to be wise about how the new young bride will devastate the rest of the family by stating, “We’ll end up without a bean”. The mother is



Cited: Wiehardt, Ginny. About.com, Fiction Writing. Web. 22 Feb. 2011. Dictionary.com. 2011. Web. 22 Feb. 2011. Kennedy, X.J. and Dana Gioia, eds. Literature: An Introduction to fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. Eleventh Edition. New York: Longman, 2010. Print. Mahfouz, Naguib. The Lawsuit. Eds. X.J. Kennedy, Dana Gioia. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the movie, A Civil Action, the plaintiff’s case commenced when a group of various parents and families suspected that the health related issues and deaths in their city of Woburn was the result of contaminated water. Although the attorney, Jan Schlichtmann, was reluctant to take the case at first because they didn’t have plausible cause “who is going to apologize to you when you don’t know who did it and pay me” [1], he perceived that 2 corporations sat on the border of the river. Mr. Schlichtmann and his firm thus took the case and filed a major lawsuit, which stated that that the two corporations, W.R Grace and Beatrice Foods, caused wrongful deaths due to the dumping of hazardous waste.”Lawsuits are a declaration of war. They begin the same way: with a complaint” [1]. The…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lee V. Weisman Case Study

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary of Key Facts A. Deborah Weisman graduated from Nathan Bishop Middle School, a public…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation Unit 3

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING, ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes Now the plaintiff, Justin King, by and through his attorney, states as follows: PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois. 2. Defendant is a corporation with its principal place of business in Missouri and carries on business in Illinois. 3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs. 4. Personal jurisdiction and venue are proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the acts of defendant caused harm to plaintiff in Cook County, in United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois. COUNT I: ________ 5. On or about April 8, 2011, plaintiff Justin King, while in the exercise of due care, was operating his motorcycle on Interstate 57, heading in a south direction, in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 6. On the occasion in question, defendant, Frank Cuellar, a resident of Illinois, was operating a truck owned by Anheuser-Busch as its agent, and was traveling in a south direction on Interstate 57, so called, a public highway in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 7. On the occasion in question, plaintiff Justin King was traveling south on Interstate 57 in Paxton, IL on his motorcycle when he noticed a truck with Anheuser-Busch logo traveling behind him headed in the same direction. The plaintiff noticed Mr. Cuellar flashing his headlights requesting to pass the plaintiff and proceeded to switch lanes. Justin King then changed lanes to the right hand lane…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Law Case Study Essay

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the case at Gigantic State University, students that were a part of the SFT committed several careless acts. Within this particular case there was a definite crime that was committed because both Prudence’s physical and mental integrity was harmed. Not only could this case be classified according to the textbook as an intentional tort against persons but could be put into intentional tort against property. Torts against persons are intentional acts that harm an individual’s physical or mental integrity (Kubasek, pg. 111). A person who is legally injured may be able to use tort law to recover damages from someone who is legally responsible, or “liable,” for those injuries. According to the case, Prudence’s physical integrity was harmed…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The lawyer is the lead in the legal team and has passed the bar examination and have a license to practice law in their respective state(s). In larger firms, the lawyers can be assigned as partners and associates. The partner has actual ownership in the firm whereas the associate are usually on salary as an employee, not being an owner in the firm. The supervising attorney in a large firm is responsible for the actions and work of the lawyers under him/her. The paralegal is responsible for the litigation process. Some of the responsibilities of the paralegal are preparing casework, investigations, preparing briefings, conducting interviews and scheduling and maintaining client contacts. The support staff are those individuals within the firm that work collectively to accomplish assignments. Investigators are those that conduct the research and gather facts regarding the case to validate or find fault in legal issues of the case. The information technologists (IT) individuals are those who maintain the software and hardware in the firm and keep the necessary equipment operational.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal scholars and sociologists have debated the effectiveness of litigation and whether it is an effective tool for bringing social change to marginalized groups. Gerald Rosenberg is one of the legal scholars that believes that courts are ineffective due to the fact they are inherently constrained by political and constitutional limitations. According to his first perspective, Rosenberg believes courts by design are unable to hear social reform claims, courts lack independence from the political branches/public opinion and lack the power to implement their decisions (McCann 1992, 717). His second perspective the “dynamic court view” he argues that the dynamic court contains a judiciary that is powerful and can be starters of change, but not…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee and the book Mississippi Trial, 1955 by Chris Crowe are two different books surround by the same ideas. To Kill a Mockingbird was a book about a girl named Scout, whose dad, Atticus, is a lawyer, who tried to win a case defending an innocent black man. Atticus did not win the case and Scout started to learn about injustice and what went on at that time in the South. Mississippi Trial, 1955 was about a boy named Hiram, who lived in the South with his grandpa because his parents were too busy working. His grandpa represented the South in the book and Hiram’s dad represented the North, and Hiram had a stronger relationship with his grandpa and did not really like his dad at the time. After a trial involving…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Civil Action Analysis

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The story is told objectively rather than subjectively in which even the most minute technical and legal details are highlighted to paint readers a picture a chronicle of this case's long litigation. Every detail adds to the suspense that keeps the reader turning the book's pages to quench their thirst for more understanding.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Margaret Fuller, who was born with the given name Sarah Margaret Fuller, then later on with the married last name Marchesa Ossoli, is best recognized for her feminist literature in the nineteenth century. In order to know about Fuller’s feminist movements, you need to know a little about her upbringing. Fuller was born on May 23rd, 1810 in Cambridgeport, Massachusetts. Later on passing away at a young age of 40 on July 19th, 1850 by heartbreakingly drowning when a cargo ship carrying her and her family hit a sandbank in Fire Island, New York. She was acknowledged to be very bright, advanced, and a child who received a concentrated education from her father, Timothy Fuller, who was a lawyer and a school teacher, due to the fact that educational…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Comes Plaintiff, Constance Wolf F/K/A Constance Wolfgram, by counsel, and for her complaint states as follows:…

    • 2306 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Litigation Assignment

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Answer: Federal Constitution is the most binding since it will override a conflict of the state constitution, Any powers not delegated by the federal constitution is reserved to the states. Federal Legislation is next since it deals with constitutional law and could override the state law if a conflict exists in the two laws. Federal law affects all states where state law is confined to each state only. Next is the States constitution as it deals with each particular state, although if there is a conflict with federal statutes, federal will override state. Last is the state legislation that are laws written by each independent state.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Case Study 2

    • 771 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Facts: On December 16, 2005, James M. Eaton, Jr., and Marguerite Eaton filed a complaint against Waldrop alleging that Waldrop had fraudulently induced James to deed certain property situated in Jefferson County ("the property") to Waldrop and Marguerite, jointly with a right of survivorship, and that Waldrop had subsequently fraudulently induced Marguerite to transfer her interest in the property to Waldrop. James and Marguerite requested that the court set aside the deed executed by James transferring the property to Marguerite and Waldrop and requested "other, further or different relief as may be just and proper"; they also demanded a trial by jury. Waldrop answered the complaint on January 26, 2006. Marguerite subsequently died, and James, as the executor of her estate, was substituted as a plaintiff.…

    • 771 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution The ultimate document that gives governments their authority; also serves to limit governmental authority, to protect civil rights, etc. Other laws, judicial decisions and executive actions must be consistent with the applicable constitution or it falls to the courts to strike down (law, decision or action).…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    litigation assignment 5

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Re: Could a complaint be dismissed due to failure to state claim upon relief in the state of North Carolina…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Litigation

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Making sure that the correct information and witnesses are kept with the correct client’s case file…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays