Preview

The Laws of Manu

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
288 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Laws of Manu
The Laws of Manu

The Laws of Manu presents detailed outline of how people live in ancient Indian society. According to the excerpt, ancient Indian people believe that everyone belongs to a certain class system bound by birth. In order to move in rank in the caste system, one must live a good life and hope to be reborn into a higher rank. There are four different caste systems total. Each caste system had a leader who enforced the duties of that certain caste. The four castes are “brahmin, the kshatriya, the vaisya, and the sudra” (Laws of Manu I.31). Ancient Indian society believes in the caste system because they believe that the laws are made by the gods. I think the laws are too strict for our present society to readopt the caste system. For example, , “By adultery committed by persons of different castes, by marriages with women who ought not to be married, and by the neglect of the duties and occupations prescribed to each, are produced sons who owe their origin to a confusion of the castes” (Laws of Manu X.24). Those who do commit adultery can be look down upon because they didn’t follow the laws. To me, I think everyone should be able to choose who they want to marry. It’s interesting how people in ancient India would accept the idea of pre-arranged marriage and the idea of born into a class system. This shows how believing in a higher being can influence the way people live.

References:
Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli, and Charles A. Moore. The Laws of Manu. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957.



References: Radhakrishnan, Sarvepalli, and Charles A. Moore. The Laws of Manu. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957. https://blackboard.xavier.edu/bbcswebdav/courses/201109-HIST-161-01/The%20Laws%20of%20Manu.pdf

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There were two parts to the caste system: The Caste as Varna and the Caste as Jati. The function of the Caste system was that it was very local and so it focused loyalties on a restricted territory. It made empire building very difficult and the caste was like a substitute for the state. The caste provided some social security and support for widows, orphans etc. The caste was a means to accommodate the migrants and invaders. Last but not least the caste made it easier for the wealthy and powerful to exploit the poor. The caste system which used birth to place people into their sectors of the sacred hierarchy was closely tied to the Hindu religion. This system remained an integral part of Indian society for…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    South Asia Theme 5 CCOT

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The region of South Asia underwent many changes and continuities that resulted in a heavily patriarchal and hierarchal social structure by 600 CE. Perhaps the biggest change in the society was the caste system brought about by Aryans from Europe. The invaders helped to develop the different statuses going from priests, to warriors, to merchants, to commoners, and the natives or untouchables at the bottom. Once people were born into their designated caste, it was basically impossible to stray from it. These different subdivisions were a result of commerce and religion. As trading became more vital, merchant and craftsmen classes grew and pushed their way onto the social scale below the warriors. Hinduism, also derived from the Aryan invaders, provided the highest social standing referred to as Brahmins or priests. The caste system grew to be more important to the people than the government's authority as it provided a strong political and social stability. The second largest faith practiced in India next to Hinduism was Buddhism. The religion grew in popularity due to its message of equality to men and women alike from all levels of society. This affected the gender roles as well as social structure although the overall patriarchy and hierarchy firmly remained. From the beginning of this era, women were viewed as inferior and little is done to change this idea through 600 CE. These women were not even entitled to own property, and the superiority of men is also shown through the emperors many wives. This is demonstrated further in the family structures of South Asia as they are always headed by the men, both young and old. Marriages were often arranged while the girls were at very young ages in order to ensure adequate dowry. Women were responsible for the nurturing of children, performance of petty chores, and any other tasks assigned by the husbands, fathers, and sons of the family. The men, on the other hand, were educated and not at all…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 3 review

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Caste System developed in India by a separation of the people due to the social hierarchy and the economical differences between them. Depending on their caste, the people were treated differently even though they lived side by side each other. The Caste system being developed allowed the “conquers” and the “conquered” to live in harmony.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    If loss of egalitarian values were a detrimental factor in the formation of river valley then the scale of hierarchy, patriarchy, and monarchy in the second wave empires could be considered ruinous. This unfair treatment of human beings was an unfortunate trait that both civilizations and empires shared. Hierarchies of class came about as one of the major turning points of human history in the first civilizations though unequal distribution of wealth and resources, ant were solidified by laws that kept them in place. In Mesopotamia, the Code of Hammurabi declared that if a commoner was strike to a man of his rank he would only have to pay a small fine, but if he dared to touch a man of a senior rank he would be reprimanded severely by being publicly whipped. Likewise, class differences played an important role in second-wave civilizations. In the Mauryan and Gupta empires, the caste system was an indicator of spiritual development, one 's position, and whether or not they were pure. Additionally, under Qin and Han dynasties there was sever class hierarchy with dominance of bureaucratic elites which gave rise to peasant rebellions. Patriarchy was also present in both river-valley societies and second wave empires. What started out as men and women playing equal roles in society soon turned to women staying at home and taking care of children while men went out to farm and fight in wars. This led to ideology that men were to be regarded as higher than women in society. Evidence of this can also be observed in Mesopotamian laws which dictated that men could hold certain privileges while women could not, such as being considered as a victim of rape. This way of thinking can also be found in Roman society. Centuries of empire building and warfare led to idea that a man could hold absolute control over his wife and had the right to kill her…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mesopotamia Social System

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Caste system is a way to categorize people in society by their ethnicity and job status. This was also hereditary and would pass from generation to generation. The caste system, though it shares the classes that many ancient civilizations followed, did not necessarily influence them at all. Some theorize that if that were the case others would have a more defined class system rather than based on wealth and status, which most of them did. Rather some historians theorize these caste came from a war and fighting with the Dravidians, the dominate group in that area.(aqrobatiq, 2015) How ever the system formed it stuck, with almost impossible odds against someone to change their caste in life. The Caste system formed out of the natural self organization that humans do when lacking a bureaucratic system in place like Egypt and Mesopotamia, The levels of the Caste system from top to bottom…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But let’s rewind a few thousand years in to one of the earliest known civilizations, the Mesopotamians. The history of Mesopotamians can be separated into two categories, the Sumerian period and the Semitic period. During these periods I see the caste system come into play because Priests were at the top of the chain, they were the ones who controlled religious and economic dealings. The Law Code of Hammurabi, I would also consider to be part of a caste system. Majority of the Law code’s requirements deal with the relationship between a husband and wife, along with the relationship between other members of the family, these are a couple of the passages from the code: 131. If a man accuses his wife and she has not been taken lying with another man, she shall take an oath in the name of god and she shall return to her house (book). 145. If a man takes his wife and she does not present him with children, and he sets his face to take a concubine, that man may take a concubine and bring her into his house (book). Even though these do not directly deal with a certain social standing they do however show the standing of women during this period, and also these laws would apply to anyone in any social…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Ikat

    • 267 Words
    • 1 Page

    The ancient Indian people has a caste system goes like this Brahmin (Priest), Chetri Kshatriya, (Ruler & Warrior) Vaishya, (Merchant, Trader, and Artisan) Shudra, (Farmer and Laborer) and Untouchables. This caste system has been used throughout their whole history and will never change. With such a consistent system that is why they have last as long as they did.…

    • 267 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is easy to understand that in traditional pre-modern societies which saw very little change, uniform submission to the established custom and usage was the norm. For example in pre-industrial India which was feudal and agrarian, the priestly community held sway and monarchs ruled with absolute power. In such stagnant and conservative times, hardly anybody deviated from the standard custom and practice. Untouchables hardly aspired to rise above their station in society as menials, people followed the hereditary profession of their community, women submitted to the authority of men and widows hardly dared to…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ambedkar shows that the caste system is inherently flawed, because it divides up the people, completely segregates them so no -intermarriage or even inter-dining is allowed by people of different caste. He goes further to give the example of the Maryann Empire, the single period in Indian history of “freedom, greatness and glory.”, that achieved its title, because it abolished the caste system, and thus the majority, or the Shudras took over. He explains that the only way Indian Society can proceed , is if they abolish the caste system. The caste system is inherently flawed because of 3 reasons. First, an outcast is shunned by the entire Hindu community. Unlike the Muslim, Christian and Sikh castes, the Hindu castes try to kill outcasts and completely shunned away. Furthermore, the outcasted person would still remain within the same caste to others, as if they have never left (its confusing, I know) 5Secondly, there is no inherent unity between the people, because the people are divided into castes. The way that the caste system works, is that it divides up the people and completely segregates them. In fact, the concept of inter-marriage and inter-dining is a foreign concept. IF one does commit such actions, they are sentenced to death by the elders.6 Thirdly and lastly, the caste system allows the insubordination of the lower castes (i.e. untouchables) by those in the higher castes 7. Let’s take the example of the tyranny practiced by the hindu community upon the…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This shows that the cast system was not meant to be oppressive or intolerant, and one day may be able to exist without intolerance again. The caste system has been a part of Hindu religion for almost 1,500 years, and havs change much through history to present day. “From the mouth came the Brahmans--the priests and teachers. From the arms come the Kshatriyas-- the rulera and solidgers. From the thighs came the Vaisya-- merchants and traders. From the feet came the Sudras--laborers” (“Untouchable“). The ranks of Hindu caste system come from a legend where the main varnas were made from a primordial being, and each varna in turn contains hundreds of castes and subcastes that can vary in size from a handful to many thousands (“What Is the Caste System?”). These castes were not made with the intention of having any hierarchy, but instead to allow specialization and made it so each member knew their role in society much like a medieval guild system. Untouchables came later, and are not considered a part of the caste system, but instead below it because they were not included in the story of how the varnas were initially…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thereafter a rigid social structure called the caste system was created; it included the Brahmins at the top as kings and priests, and The Untouchables at the bottom as poor, street cleaners. Within the system, there is no social mobility. The people couldn't move up a caste within their lifetime. A devoted follower was expected to marry, socialize, and work within their caste. The Brahmins were the most educated caste and typically held political positions. The caste system created an unequal society with a dominant hierarchy that benefitted the Brahmins and oppressed the Shudras and Untouchables. In Hinduism the only way to advance socially was through reincarnation; by following dharma Hindus with good karma could be reincarnated into a higher caste. The creation of the caste system created social order by encouraging people to follow the rules of their caste for fear of being reincarnated into a lower status. Therefore Hinduism’s belief impacted the social and political decisions made in…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Hindu Caste System

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout thousands of years in the Hindu religion, a person’s social class was determined immediately after they are born. This organisation was then later known as the Caste System. Caste members lived, married, and worked within their selected group. A person born into one caste was not allowed to change castes or associate with other members of a different caste. Rules and expectations were set for each caste, each caste had a clear and distinct role within the community. It does not allow for upward mobility in society the Caste System is made up of four different castes; the highest among Hindu society were the Brahmins or priests, for the members of this caste it is essential that they keep themselves pure since they handle…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Question: Explain the origins of the caste system. Where did the system come from?…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this society, freedom to pick your own job, your way of life and your status in this life is nearly impossible as everything is chosen for you by people that are supposedly more enlightened than you. The only equality that exists for someone in this society is the fact that you are guaranteed a spot in the caste system into which you were unknowingly born into. Men may only procreate when the time is right according to the established law. (461a) If a man attempts reproduction outside of these times, then he will be punished accordingly. Also, if a man and women marry outside the law then they can also be punished. (461) Children…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Epic of Gilgamesh

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For my final paper I will be comparing and contrasting how women were affected and regulated by the Code of Hammurabi and the Laws of Manu, and will examine the mythological evidence and materials related to Ancient Mesopotamian polytheism, Egyptian polytheism, and Hinduism. The Laws of Manu were compiled over the years between 200 - 400 C.E. While the position of women in early Vedic India had been good, these laws illustrate the efforts of the Brahmin elite to restrict women’s legal independence in this later period. Both the laws of Manu and Hammurabi were related to marriage, family law, and the ways in which female behavior is regulated in both legal codes. Hammurabi was the ruler who chiefly established the greatness of Babylon, the world's first metropolis, The Code of Hammurabi is a well-preserved Babylonian law code that dates back to about 1772 BC. The code was carved upon a black stone monument, eight feet high, it was clearly intended to be reared in for the public to view. The Code of Hammurabi was one of several sets of laws in the ancient near east. The stone was found in the year 1901 in a city of the Persian mountains. The early collections of the code include the Code of Ur-Nammu, king of Ur (ca. 2050 BC), the Laws of Eshnunna (ca. 1930 BC) and the codex of Lipit-Ishtar of Isin (ca. 1870 BC), the later laws included the Hittite laws, the Assyrian laws, and Mosaic Law. Both the Code of Hammurabi and The laws of Manu provided freedoms for women and they provided protection for them, overall I believe the laws of Manu provided better protection and freedom to the women.…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays