The Landmark Intellectual Property Case

Topics: American record labels, Warner Bros. Records, Warner Music Group Pages: 4 (1154 words) Published: August 24, 2013
A&M Records v Napster
“The landmark intellectual property case”
 This was the first major case to address the application of copyright laws to peer-to-peer file-sharing. Introduction

Plaintiffs
1. A&M Records, a subsidiary of Universal Music Group 2. Geffen Records, a subsidiary of Universal Music Group
3. Interscope Records, a subsidiary of Universal Music Group 4. Sony Music Entertainment
5. MCA Records, a subsidiary of Universal Music Group
6. Atlantic Records, a subsidiary of Warner Music Group
7. Island Records, a subsidiary of Universal Music Group
8. Motown Records, a subsidiary of Universal Music Group
9. Capitol Records, a subsidiary of EMI
10. LaFace Records, a subsidiary of Sony Music Entertainment 11. BMG Music d/b/a The RCA Records Label, subsidiaries of Sony Music Entertainment 12. Universal Records, a subsidiary of Universal Music Group 13. Elektra Entertainment Group, a subsidiary of Warner Music Group 14. Arista Records, a subsidiary of Sony Music Entertainment 15. Sire Records Group, a subsidiary of Warner Music Group 16. Polygram Records, a subsidiary of Universal Music Group 17. Virgin Records America, a subsidiary of EMI

18. Warner Bros. Records, a subsidiary of Warner Music Group Defendant
Napster, it provided a platform for users to access and download compressed digital music files, specifically MP3s, from other users' machines. Legal Issues
In 2000, A&M Records along with 18 other record companies sued Napster. Under the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act, A&M accused Napster for contributory and vicarious copyright infringement. Rules & Principles

Audio Home Recording Act
Congress enacted the AHRA in 1992 in response to the advent of digital audio tape recording equipment and supplies entering the American market. The law imposed monetary duties on the equipment and supplies, but in exchange permitted “noncommercial” users to be protected from...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Cross Border Intellectual Property Litigation Essay
  • Essay about intellectual property
  • Essay on An Analysis of a Intellectual Property Court Case
  • Intellectual Property Essay
  • Napster and Intellectual Property Essay
  • Overview of Intellectual Property Essay
  • Intellectual Property Issues Case Study Essay
  • Essay on Intellectual Property

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free