The project also received executive support from the top ranks of HP despite the hesitation of some of the R&D section managers in view of the unclear market of the proposed new product.
HP seems to have done everything
First, HP maintained its focus on the market. During the World War II, HP’s strategy of only focus on “building a group of complementary products rather than becoming involved in a lot of un related things” reduced the damage to the company after the war ends. Otherwise, it may not survive when facing a 50 percent decline in revenue. Meanwhile, as a high-tech venture focus on innovation products, HP's design engineers find the needs of customer by determining whether the product met the needs of fellow engineer sitting at the next bench within the company rather than depending on market research. It helped HP understand its market’s needs and was a successful approach in HP’s early day.…
“Recognize that the basic unit (or fundamental building block) of innovation is a network that includes people and knowledge both inside and outside the organization” (Davila, Epstein, & Shelton 2006, p. 11). Management should take advantage of the resources within the organization to take it to the next level.…
To this day, HP maintains the same values, “Success hinges on consistency of leadership, focus, execution and most importantly, great products and services” (About). In addition to this, the case study explains that the company values their innovator’s thoughts and opinions as well as providing a lot of room for creativity:…
In summer 1998, there was tremendous pressure on Jim Davis, manager of ESG due to the downfall in the revenues and profits. The company had the opportunity to show improved results by strategizing its technology implementation decisions. There was an issue where Davis was to recommend whether HP should continue with the proprietary UNIX based Performance Architecture (PA) based on RISC microprocessor or shift resources to develop workstations and servers based on new chip, code named Merced and IA-64 architecture.…
I just wanted to let you know that I will be hosting the fundraiser for my Eagle Project this weekend. It will be a car wash at Advanced Auto Parts on the corner of Barnes and Murrell from 9am to 1pm. If you want to come out to the event i'm sure that we can do a nice job at washing your car. Hope to see you…
The HP Kittyhawk case allows students to explore in detail why it is so difficult for established firms to succeed at disruptive technologies.…
Learning Team B took a look a list of six characteristics about managing innovation and technology. Our team reviewed the characteristics based on the most to the least important. First, we assess the characteristic by studying and analyzing the information. We determined that periodic reviews of informal proposals by a group outside line management was most important, because this could be used to integrate into the company’s strategy and function, which is a rule of thumb in the innovation process. Next, we knew that a clear direction on studies to be done and follow-ups are expected and is an essential way to start a resourceful business strategy (White and Bruton, 2007).…
IBM’s leadership was not visionary and could not see the potential in spear-heading innovation. They simply forgot that IBM’s success was as a result of innovative ideas in the computer industry. Instead of hanging on to former inventions,…
Iansiti. M. 1992. Science-based product development: An empirical study of the mainframe computer industry. Working paper. Harvard Business School. Cambridge, MA.…
In this excerpt from a textbook, the author examines how Andy Grove, the CEO of a chipset venture, created an extremely strong strategy process based mainly on Intel’s core microprocessor business. Burgelman talks about how the venture succeed even though top management at Intel didn’t regard the chipsets as a business in its own right, but rather as a strategic support for microprocessors. Using data from interviews with most of the key personnel involved in the venture, this chapter describes and analyzes its development within Intel, and the steps and challenges that were taken to have it succeed.…
Introduction IDEO is a design and innovation consulting firm that was founded in 1991 and has been a successful example of what innovation and innovative design can accomplish. Its Palm V program was quite successful and created new expectations for what PDAs could look like and do, while maintaining a functional simplicity. Jeff Hawkins had started the original Palm Pilot program in 1996 and found enthusiastic acceptance among consumers. Senior project leader Dennis Boyle was chosen to head up the development of the Palm V, which would integrate a slim, more colorful and sleek design, which would focus more on emotional appeal than souped‐up hardware. IDEO’s culture could be described as eccentric, fun, creative, and innovative. The outside‐the‐ box working styles and shifting of working groups help to keep thinkers fresh and constantly on their toes. In the early 90s it was innovative to the point of being ambiguous at times for staff and management, but this was seen as providing fertile conditions for the generation of innovative thinking and ideas. However, by the late 90s this culture had become slightly more bureaucratic, to the chagrin of the executives and founders. This is because the management itself is a creative and inspired group that is very comfortable with ambiguity. This is exemplified by founder David Kelley’s dismay when asked permission by employees to leave early or bring a spouse to a company event; he would much rather there was less hierarchy. IDEO’s product creation process is unique in that it embraces the eccentricities of its corporate culture, and does so to increase the creativity and value of the designs it produces. Having a team together for only one project at a time, dispersing them and changing team formations for other projects, makes the input for new designs diversified and the thinking of the participants fresh. Healthy teams are extremely important for stimulating…
Case Analysis 1 - Apple Computer: Research how Apple managed to reinvent itself over the years.…
Description: With the runaway success of its products—the iPod lineup, iTunes, the Macbook—Apple has re-emerged as one of the world’s most innovative companies. Apple has managed to sustain its innovation efforts with calculated, consistent increases in R&D spending and rapid-fire launches of new products and upgrades. What lies behind Apple’s success is not luck—the company has very deliberately focused its efforts on generating better ideas faster. Discover more with this 17-page case study.…
M²cell can be considered a example of radical and architectural innovation within a system. Consequences of such development can often be far reaching, complex and unexpected influences on the industry. (Schilling, 2008)…
One of the first challenges facing Mr. Heal and Mr. Thomas is the notion of strategic vs. tactical decisions. On page three of the case, we learn that in February 2002, Mr. Thomas met with HP’s then worldwide alliance manager for Cisco, Fabio Fontana, and decided that the “alliance would benefit if HP become more strategic while Cisco became more tactical.” Further discussion on page three tells the reader that strategic refers to a firm achieving long term goals while tactical refers more to achieving short-term goals. In fact, the case mentions that “over 70% of the team’s (Cisco) success (was) measured by factors other than near-term revenue.” (Page 3)…