Preview

The Killing Fields Totalitarian Rule

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
857 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Killing Fields Totalitarian Rule
In “The Killing Fields”, totalitarian rule is demonstrated countless times throughout the course of the movie. Totalitarian rule is a type of dictatorship where usually one person rules the state and strives to control every aspect of his or her citizen’s private and public life. The type of government that uses totalitarian rule is a dictatorship because totalitarian rulers take power by force and there is a single lone person in charge. Totalitarian leaders maintain their power by strong propaganda, censored media, control over the economy, regulation and restriction of speech, mass surveillance, use of secret police, no elections, and purging of government officials. It is easier to achieve and maintain totalitarian rule then a democratic rule because it’s faster to take over a state by force then having to deal with tedious and long elections of a …show more content…
In addition, in a democracy the president has to consult with the people and other government officials before making important decisions unlike in a totalitarian government where one main leader makes all the decisions himself without caring or compromising with anybody else’s opinions. Though some prime examples of historical totalitarian rulers were Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin, this relentless form of government still exists today. When the Khemer Rouge took over Cambodia, Pol Pot’s vision for the future was simple, cleanse and bring the country back to “year zero”. Pol Pot named his new country The Nation of Kampucha and began to get rid of any western influence, high education, art, journalism, and industry, which he strongly believed were poisoning the country. He chose to modify the country so that it was able to be self-dependent on agriculture, forcing Cambodians

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    When Pol Pot took over Cambodia, it was one of the most horrible genocides next to the Holocaust, in the 1970’s; this was a big part of history. In March 1970, Marshal Lon Nol, a Cambodian politician who had previously served as prime minister, and his pro-American associates staged a successful overthrow to depose Prince Sihanouk as head of state. At this time, the Khmer Rouge had gained members and was positioned to become a major player in the civil war due to its alliance with Sihanouk. The Communist Party of Kampuchea (CPK), otherwise known as the Khmer Rouge, took control of Cambodia on April 17, 1975. The CPK created the state of Democratic Kampuchea in 1976 and ruled the country until…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fm Rouge Research Paper

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It was made official when the communist party took control over the city of Phnom Penh in April 17, 1975, declaring their victory in the Civil War. A few days later, the Khmer Rouge had forced an estimated two million residents of Phnom Penh to the countryside to take up strictly rice farming. Thousands died during the evacuation, but the nearly the total two million evacuated were killed by the end of the Khmer’s regime (Dy, 2007). Often compared to the Holocaust, the Cambodian Genocide replayed many similar factors such as ethnic cleansing, and hopes for creating a new Cambodia in general. Those ill, protestant, or handicapped were killed on the spot or imprisoned, and those deemed useless were executed (Panh, 2003). Pol Pot named this year Year Zero: a new beginning, where he would rid the country of school, hospitals, churches, and religion. He aimed to return Cambodia to an agricultural farming nation, nothing more than that. The Khmer Rouge killed more than a majority of teachers and doctors, and destroyed most of all schools in the process (Stevens, 2010). Labor camps that Cambodians were later sent to became known as the “Killing Fields” and most of the food grown there was kept for the Khamers Rouges, leaving little to none for the laborers themselves. By the end of the Rouge’s four-year terror reign, Cambodia had lost its elite class, proving to have devastating effect in…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When I began thinking of a totalitarian government a good example came to mind is the totalitarian states of Nazi Germany which was under the leadership of Adolf Hitler at that time. It was the first examples of decentralized or popular totalitarianism in which the state achieved an overwhelming popular support for its country 's leadership. The support from its individuals was not spontaneous but it genesis depended on its charismatic leader. It also was made possible only by the modern developments in its communication…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is an idea that totalitarian governments are bad and should be removed everywhere and replace it with totalitarianism. “The contention of this book is thus that the notion of totalitarianism, far from being an effective theoretical concept, is kind of a stopgap: instead of enabling us to think, forcing us to acquire a new insight into the historical reality it describes, it relieves us of the duty to think, or even actively prevents us from thinking.” (Zizek) Our government in the US makes our decisions basically, however we still get the freedom to do what we please for the most part. The difference in a totalitarian government is the fact that they are usually ruled by a dictator and what freedoms does that give a person? They do not get to think on their own like Zizek said, they might even be prevented from thinking on their…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Totalitarianism as explained by Merriam Webster dictionary is a political centralized system ran by an autocratic authority in which its citizens are subject to total and absolute state of authority. The system has no recognition of limits to its authority to regulate every aspect of citizen’s public and personal life (Merriam-Webster Dictionary, 2015).…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Totalitarian Government

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Currently the world faces the greatest threat mankind has ever seen, a zombie apocalypse. In the streets of cities, states, and countries, people are being savagely butchered as infected people spread the epidemic across the land. Crippling the world with a disaster beyond anything that mankind has dealt with before. Deciding on the best course of action boils down to either forming a republic or totalitarian state. The many voices of a republic leads to inaction due to so many decision makers is too slow and weak in a crisis to effectively deal with this world crisis with its lack of control and direction. Delays and indecision made this catastrophe grow worse when quick action was needed to prevent such needless loss. Immediate action to…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Totalitarian regimes are more repressive of pluralism and political rights than authoritarian ones. Under a totalitarian regime, the government controls nearly every aspect of the individual's life. Totalitarian governments do not tolerate activities by individuals or groups that are not influenced by the government's goals. Totalitarian governments maintain themselves in power through secret police, propaganda trickled down through the media, the elimination of open criticism of the government, and use of terror tactics. Internal and external threats are created to create unity through…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the information I read I don't believe that there is any area around the world that could benefit by using a totalitarian government. Using this government is suicide for a nation and its people. To believe that taking away a person's freedom and dreams in order to make a sovereign nation is complete "Bull". Totalitarian system uses the same circumstances needed for liberal democracy and, harnessed to a fixed goal, acts to negate or reverse the attitudes that underpin democracy. Twentieth-century technology has provided the possibilities for the use of media such as, newspapers, radio, film and television to "brainwash" citizens, and modern communications to identify dissidents and co-ordinate action against them.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When thinking of a totalitarian government a good example that comes to mind would be North Korea. They have a dictator that rules every aspect of the citizens lives. There is propaganda all over the place from the television to the text books that suggest that nothing is more important than the dictator. The citizens are not even allowed to have in their possession any magazines that are not government issued and are not allowed to have cell phones either. I learned all of this one day when there was a special on Oprah, and they had a correspondent go into North Korea.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hannah Arendt is widely regarded as one of the most important, unique and influential thinkers of political philosophy in the Twentieth century. Arendt was greatly influenced by her mentor and one time lover, Martin Heidegger, whose phenomenological method would help to greatly shape and frame Arendt’s own thinking. Like Heidegger, Arendt was sceptical of the metaphysical tradition which tended towards abstract conceptual reasoning; ultimately at odds with the reality of human lived experience. Consequently, Arendt was highly dubious of being referred to as a philosopher, as she felt philosophy was, by its own essence, confined to the proverbial ivory tower. She believed political life was at the apex of human experience and so she identified as a political thinker/actor. Her emphasis on the phenomenological nature of the lived political experience permeates her life’s works and perhaps can be said to constitute her own distinct brand of political philosophy. Arendt’s early publication, Ideology & Terror: A Novel Form of Government, is a profound elucidation of the…

    • 2292 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, we live in a republic society where we use our freedom of choice to elect officials to make decisions for us. Totalitarianism is the complete opposite of what we use. In totalitarian societies, all decisions are made by a dictator and strictly limits people’s freedom to none. The dictator sees no restrictions to his power and aims to be controller of everything. Totalitarian societies are generally created through propaganda campaigns, technology, and terror propagated through mass media.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Totalitarian Germany

    • 2234 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Germany under Nazi rule, through the years 1933-39 contained many ‘totalitarian’ aspects to its regime, but for it to be exclusively described as totalitarian would not be accurate. Critics of the concept of totalitarianism often argue that there is no clear distinction between totalitarian and authoritarian regimes but merely ones created to make it seem that these two concepts of power are in fact diverse. The Nazi Party lacked in organisation and unity which would be expected of a totalitarian state, this is not to say that Nazi Germany did not contain numerous aspects that would support the idea that in fact it was a totalitarian society. Italian Fascist philosopher Giovanni Gentile states that a totalitarian state is “nothing beyond the state; nothing against the state; nothing outside the state”. These aspects of a totalitarian society crushed the lives of many Germans, but was generally accepted and welcomed by much of the population, due to the unstable state of the former European superpower. Whilst the Nazi Party always aimed to make the nation one of a totalitarian society it was never completely able to capitalise on its plan, this was a direct result of the enemies the party had gained throughout its propel into power. However historian John Stuart Mill states that “as an ideal totalitarianism seeks to bring the state and its apparatus of control into many aspects of private life, such as the family and religion, seeking to mold people’s interests and cultural pursuits”, which is exactly what Hitler was successfully able to achieve through his Hitler’s youth programs as well as numerous incentives proposed to family units in Nazi Germany.…

    • 2234 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    If totalitarianism is defined as "all within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state" then Nazi Germany never achieved true totalitarianism. There was always political opposition and insurgency. The church constantly opposed Nazi ideology. Members of the army plotted against him. When Hitler did try to take control of the German people, through the youth he was met with almost as much opposition as acceptance. The only area in which he was able to maintain full control was in the media and the legal system. One only has to look beyond the surface to realise that while Hitler may have held some control, without the full cooperation from those within the state he never achieved a totalitarian state in…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Totalitarian Government

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Totalitarianism is a form of government that has total and absolute control over the people. Some people may believe that totalitarianism is the logical choice of government if the well being of a nation is at risk. However, I do not agree with this statement, I feel that totalitarianism should never be used under any circumstance.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is mainly where the weaknesses of a dictatorship begin to show. A single person who has come to power over the rest runs a dictatorship. That one person sets the law, controls the nation power and is in charge foreign affairs. This can be dreadful for citizens who do not agree with the dictator’s policies. Although it does not share the same weakness as a democracy carries, it does hold many potential dangers. Since in this type of government, they treat their citizens like cattle instilling rules to make sure they behave and not thinking about what is best for the majority of the citizens, but what is best for the government itself. However, a dictatorship also…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays