Preview

The Juvenile Justice System

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
904 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Juvenile Justice System
The criminal justice system is identified as an important aspect of our society and enforcing laws that help develop the well being of our nation. One would say the criminal justice system is not implemented to arrest, prosecute or punish criminals, however it is there to prevent crime and form a peaceful, law abiding society. In doing this there would have to be a balance with criminal justice and the rights of the individual accused with society’s need for order. The extent of the efficiency of the juvenile justice system, media’s influence over juveniles and their impact on society's need for order and the possible solutions to the problems arising from these systems, need to be changed in order to reduce the high rate of youth crime. In …show more content…
Queensland maintains that a child under the age of 10 years is not considered criminally responsible for their actions and a child under the age of 14 years is also not considered criminally responsible, unless it is proven that the child understood the offence was wrong since 1st August 1997 Criminal Code Act 1899. This applies to every state in Australia, however for Queensland unlike every state it also states that 17 year olds can be placed in an adult jail. This particular Act does not provide the 17 year old individual with a balance in the justice system. Adult jails are known to be dangerous and violent which places the juveniles at an enormous risk of being violently victimised by adult offenders. 17 year olds are still considered physically and mentally immature and do not deserve to be mentally and physically drained by the effects of being in an adult prison. In QLD children at the age of 17 are unable to vote, drink alcohol, or otherwise participate fully in society until the age of 18 thus should not be treated as adults by the criminal law. The civil law and child protection system also recognises that children under the age of 18 do not have full capacity to be dealt with in an adult jail. Queensland is an isolated state it is the only jurisdiction in the country that continues to treat 17 year olds as adults. When the juvenile justice act in 1992 just got passed by the QLD government, …show more content…
The 1988 Kennedy Review Into Corrective Service was one of the reports that criticised The Children Service Act 1965 (QLD)that stated that a child was defined as under the age of 17. The 1988 Kennedy report stated that “...people under 18 just should not be in adult prisons. They are children in law children in terms of rights and responsibilities” this was the first significant criticism of the juvenile justice system in QLD. The UN Convention of the Rights of the Child in 1990 also supported the 1988 Kennedy Review by stating that “ ...a child means every human being below the age of 18 years unless the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier.” This was presented in 1990 and came into power in 1991 this was a unanimous agreement by all Australian governments. This was also the first convention specifically for the rights of children. In 1992 the Juvenile Justice Act (QLD) was passed, which is the current Act QLD juvenile justice system is based on. This Act had 17 year olds as part of the juvenile justice system, when this Act was passed, The Hon Ann Warner expressed his support for the 1988 Kennedy Review and later declared that the act would change in the future. And yet 24 years later 17 year olds are still considered

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile Justice

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In recent discussion of Juvenile Justice, a controversial issue has been whether juveniles should be tried as adults in adult courts for heinous crimes they have committed. On one hand, some argue that they should not be tried as adults and do not deserve harsh sentences but as children seeking help. On the other hand, however, others argue that those who commit such heinous crimes ought to be punished no matter the age. The juvenile court was created to handle juvenile offenders on the basis of their youth rather than their crimes. The purpose of juvenile court is treatment and guidance rather than punishment. Juveniles don't have the knowledgeable or moral capacity to understand the consequences of their actions; similarly, they lack the same capacity to be trial defendants. Juveniles today are more knowledgeable and cultured at a younger age; they understand the implications of violence and how violent weapons are used. It is irrational to argue that a juvenile, who sees the effect of violence around him in the news every day, does not understand what killing really is. The fact that “adolescent killers” know how to load and shoot a gun or use a knife to kill is an indicator that they understand exactly what they're doing.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice Act 1992

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The purpose of the Juvenile Justice Act 1992 is to establish a code for dealing with youth offenders under the age of 17. The Act regulates the courts dealings with children who come in contact with the youth justice system. This includes police response, diversionary options of rehabilitation against detention, multiple sentencing options, operation of detention centres and recognition of family and community with particular reference to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island communities. A review of the former Juvenile Justice Act 1992 commenced in May 2007. This review was an assessment of legislation to ensure it is providing the best practice youth justice system that has the capacity to adequately respond to demands and challenges of today’s…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (The appeal under 28.U.S.C. 1257 (2) judgment from the Supreme court of Arizona affirming the dismissal of petition. The petition sought for the release of 15 years old Gerald Francis Gault.) Gault had been committed as a juvenile delinquent by the state of Gila County, Arizona. The dismissal came forth because the alleged denial of procedural due process rights to juveniles and various arguments against the constitutional juvenile code of Arizona.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The court system for juveniles in the United States was first formed in 1899, in Cook County, Illinois, which then was quickly spread across the country and most other state courts decided to establish one as well, that then in turn created the juvenile justice system. With the purpose of rehabilitating each underage offender in order for them to become a productive part of society and also to protect them by having them separated from any type of exposure to adult offenders and mentally ill adult offenders that were incarcerated as well.…

    • 3966 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Earlier this year the Supreme Court of the United States handed down arguably one their most important, yet controversial decisions regarding juvenile law. In the case Roper v Simmons (2005), a narrow 5-4 decision, overturned the United States practice of allowing capital punishment for juvenile offenders.…

    • 3690 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The juvenile justice system process is rather new. The juvenile justice system really changed between 1966 and 1967; with kent vs United States and in re Gualt. Both added rights to the juvenile justice system that adults get. The evolution of the system sped up after those decisions. With eight very important Supreme Court decisions after 1967 till 2012. Each expanding the juvenile justice system.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is no doubt that youthful offending has occurred throughout recorded history. Youth offenders are grouped in an individual division of the criminal justice system, known as the Juvenile Justice System. Juvenile Justice is an extensive term, encompassing numerous aspects of the criminal justice system, from criminology, to crime prevention strategies, punishment and rehabilitation. According to the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987 (NSW), juvenile justice refers to the system of criminal law which deals with offenders between the ages of ten and eighteen. This group can then be subcategorised into offences committed by children (aged ten to fifteen) and young people (aged sixteen to eighteen). Both of these subcategories of individuals…

    • 6719 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Persuasive Paper Part 1

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    From the 1980s to the 1990s there has been a surge in minors who commit violent crimes as shown in a research study conducted by the Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch Currently. The information was based on federal and state correctional data related to race, history and nature of crimes committed by minors. The study showed inmates under the age of 18 in state prisons has more than doubled from 1985-1997. The study also shows that 61% of those minors admitted were convicted of violent offenses1. The Juvenile Court Act was founded in 18992 when the idea of reforming minors took place and the majority of crimes committed by minors were of minor misconduct. The justice systems were separated because adults were treated as criminals and minors were treated for rehabilitation. , created to rehabilitate and protect minors. The courts intended the system to be more informal and treat the juveniles rather than punish them. This system was not developed to undertake the current rise of…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cases are allocated depending on age from the juvenile justice system to the criminal justice system. A "child" or "juvenile" meaning any person who is under the age of eighteen is placed by default in the juvenile justice system. Therefore, after defendants turn eighteen their cases fall under the criminal justice system unless convicted under the Youthful Offender act. Offender classification is the most significant phase in criminal proceedings as it can drastically change your punishment. Children as soon as the age of thirteen, may be classified under the Youthful Offender depending on the severity of the crime. Once a defendant is classified as a juvenile they are not tried in the criminal justice system. Significantly, Juveniles have…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A Broken Juvenile Justice System.” Baltimore Sun. N.p., 06 Aug. 2012. Web. 20 Mar. 2013 http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-08-06/news/bs-ed-juvenile-jail-editorial-20120806_1_million-juvenile-jail-adult-facility-youthful-offenders…

    • 2312 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juveniles have been incarcerated in secure facilities since 1974. Juveniles are committing more heinous crimes and citizens have advocated for tougher penalties on crime. They want justice for the violence perpetrated on their families, businesses and communities. The Juvenile Justice system is charged with simultaneously protecting the public as well as reforming those juveniles who are convicted and sentenced to secure facilities. Barry C. Feld (1995) believes that there is a “desire to "get tough," fueled in part by frustration with the intractability of crime, that provides political impetus to transfer some young offenders to criminal courts for prosecution as adults and to strengthen the sanctioning powers of juvenile courts”(p.966).…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The question of whether we should have continued use of a separate juvenile justice system or should we abolish it is a huge debate in the U.S. Is the separate, juvenile justice system still feasible? If not, what can replace it? Policymakers need to confront these questions, and they need innovative answers. New policies should aim for more than simply abolishing the juvenile court's delinquency jurisdiction and sending all young offenders to conventional criminal courts.…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime - young offenders

    • 2519 Words
    • 11 Pages

    It is widely acknowledged in Australia and around the world that young people under the age of 18 should be subject to a system of criminal justice that is separate from the adult system. This is because young people often have lower levels of maturity, as well as knowledge when it comes to the law. Although morals and ethics form an important part of school education (helping young people to make sensible decisions), most aspects of the law do not become clear until they reach adulthood. In NSW young people are legally separated from adults when it comes to rights such as questioning, identification, forensic procedures, having the right to a support person and automatic legal aid. Young people also have a separate court to deal with their and separate legislation offences. The effectiveness of these judicial and legislative provisions inevitably has mixed results. This merits an ongoing monitoring and review process that aims to identify the legal issues faced by young offenders within the criminal justice system, and support and protect young people in the legal system.…

    • 2519 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juvenile Justice System

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When we start to discuss juvenile delinquency and juvenile crimes it can sometimes become complicated because of age limitations that come within the bounds of the law. Each state has their own interpretation of what is considered a juvenile in the juvenile justice system. Juveniles in the State of Louisiana are defined as anyone who is older than age 10 and younger than age 17, where a 17-year-old is classified in the eyes of the state as an adult. In the State of Louisiana a 10-year-old juvenile may be charged for any crime that he or she may commit. In the juvenile justice system there are six categories in which are still used in today’s judicial system jurisdictions to describe the variety of children are subject to juvenile court jurisdiction (Schmalleger, 2011).…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several broad observations and trends in Australian juvenile justice can be identified at the national level. Over the last ten years, there has been a decrease in the number of cases heard in Australian children’s courts due to the increasing trend of diverting juveniles during the early stages of processing. Such diversionary measures typically include conferencing, drug and alcohol courts and programs, juvenile justice teams and special courts and programs for young people. The most common types of offences for which juveniles are adjudicated in children’s courts include burglary or theft, assault and dangerous or negligent driving. Of all juvenile defendants who appeared in Australian children’s courts during the 2006-07 financial year, ninety-two percent received a criminal conviction and eighty-two percent pleaded guilty. Ninety-two percent of convicted juvenile offenders received non-custodial penalties such as fines, good behaviour bonds or community supervision orders. ‘How effective is the juvenile justice system?’ is a very difficult question to answer and will vary from person to person as some will be looking at the reduction in the crime rate will others will look at victim satisfaction. In Australia the Juvenile system I believe is quite effective as each state have their own specific way in tackling young offenders , that are relevant specifically to that state. The AIC has monitored juveniles in detention in Australia since 1981. It has found that the number of juvenile detainees per 100,000 head of population dropped from 64.9 in 1981 to 37 in…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics