Preview

The Irenaean Theodicy: The Death Of God Model

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
349 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Irenaean Theodicy: The Death Of God Model
The Irenaean theodicy argues that part of human growth is suffering and an evil nature, which guides us to God. However, the Death of God model argues the exact opposite. The Death of God model argues that evil cannot be an instrument of God and therefore, God has to be dead. Strengths of the Death of God model include the view that evil is not an instrument of God and the rejection of the traditional God that intervenes on Earth. The view that evil is not an instrument of God allows people to place hope in their God. If one saw their God as creating evil, they would not find hope and comfort from that same source. The rejection of an intervening God forces people to take action in dire situations and not be a bystander in hopes that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Pramiti Sankar PHIL 100 AD0 3 March 2024 Section 1: Introduction In this paper, I will critique William L. Rowe's argument from the problem of evil against the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, and wholly good God. Rowe constructs a deductively valid argument that aims to show that the existence of intense suffering in the world provides rational grounds for atheism - the belief that such a theistic God does not exist. While his argument is logically valid, there are ultimately not sufficient grounds to confidently affirm the truth of the first premise because of our inherent human limitations in knowledge, potential ignorance of goods beyond our comprehension, fallibility in evaluating goods versus evils, and the importance of preserving…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Irenaeus’ original theory is based on his interpretation of Genesis 1:26 ‘Let us make man in our image, after our likeness’. From this Irenaeus concluded that first humans were made in the image of God and are only intended to develop later into his likeness through willing cooperation. This cooperation however requires genuine freedom, as it is not possible to willingly cooperate when something is forced upon us. The freedom is the reason why evil has to exist in the world; our ability to choose to do evil instead of good makes us free. There would be no such freedom if humans were created already perfect and God policed his world continually as there would be no capacity for us to choose evil and so no free will. Therefore, the natural order had to be designed with the possibility of causing harm, humans had to be created only in the image of God, and God has to keep an epistemic distance from his creation. Eventually, however, evil and suffering will be overcome and everyone will develop into the likeness of God, living in glory in heaven.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    protocol paper 1

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Recall: In "The problem of evil," James Rachels and Stuart Rachels provider some important point: 1) Pain is not body’s warning system needed, because newborn babies did not deserve inexorable pain; 2) Even If we need evil to appreciate the good, but it is does not explain why there is such an extraordinary amount of evil in this world; 3) The doctrine of original sin was absurd. According to authors, it would be come to a conclusion that a newborn baby did deserve terrible disease. 4) The idea that Free Will Defense is in apparent contradiction to the natural evil in the world. 5) Based on the idea that a world without suffering would be void of the virtues necessary for good moral development. It does not explain the reason that God allowed the Holocaust or isolated cases of extreme cruelty to happen. 6) The theory of moral development does not explain the reason why animals suffering.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The question of whether there is a God has been debated by many philosophers, religious experts, and even your average citizens. Many of those people have attempted to argue why God is or is not real. This paper is going to present two different arguments by the philosophers: Robin Collins and William Rowe. The first argument by Collins is an argument for the existence of God, who designed our incredibly complex universe. The explanation of Collin’s argument will be followed by Rowe’s argument against the existence of God, which is in relation to intense suffering that exists in this world. With those two arguments at hand, the question is, are the conclusions compatible?…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Prayer for Owen Meany

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A requirement of the human condition is to believe in something. Some people choose to believe in a single god, or many gods, or absolutely nothing at all. Everyone must “believe” in something, because with no tangible proof of our purpose or afterlife, it is impossible to truly “know” anything. Thus, we believe. This requires faith. Seemingly random evils, such as the unfair death of a loved one, can put one’s faith to the test. It helps if what one believes in has the capacity to rationalize some of these harder to swallow realities. In answer to this, a comforting idea of thought is quite popular among spiritual people: fate. The idea of fate walks hand in hand with the belief that God is in control and has a plan, which takes the pressure of responsibility off of believers’ shoulders. In this sense, God maneuvers the arms of people to his will. Owen’s belief that he is God’s instrument manifests itself in the motif of armlessness, which represents the helplessness of people in the face of divine fate and the surrender of the individual to God.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rambam Research Paper

    • 5133 Words
    • 21 Pages

    It is impossible to look at the world and not see tremendous suffering, evil, and injustice. The existence of despotic rulers depriving millions of life and liberty, massive acts of natural destruction, untimely deaths, debilitating and deadly diseases, and more, must beg the religious person to question how this can be in a world created and ruled by a just and loving God. This study will investigate the philosophies of two great Jewish thinkers; Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon (Rambam) of the 12th century, and the modern process theologist, Rabbi Bradley Shavit Artson,…

    • 5133 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "Death is nothing to us, has no relevance to our condition, seeing that the mind is mortal". So claimed Lucretius: Roman poet, philosopher and Epicurean. In prolific verse from The Way Things Are, Lucretius denied that death was an evil and suggested that death should not be feared at all. Lucretius' beliefs put him in the same camp as Epicurus, whom he mentions in his verse, making him known as an Epicurean, which I shall define for the purposes of this paper as someone who believes that death is not something to be feared. The opposing camp to this view comprises, among others, Nagel and Williams, who argue that death should be feared. I will discuss and analyze the conflict between several arguments put forth by both parties and conclude…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this outpouring of emotion the author conveys an annoyed tone that exemplifies to the audience why god is not real.Harris ends his article by explaining how much of the world suffering could be attributed to religion. He appeals to the contrasting idea of good and bad by admitting, “If God exists, either He can do nothing to stop the most egregious calamities, or He does not care to. God,therefore, is either impotent or evil.” (Harris n.p.). And, “Of course, people of faith regularlyassure one another that God is not responsible for human suffering. But how else can we understand the claim that God is both omniscient and omnipotent?” (Harris n.p.). He examinesthe good and bad in order to how god is not all powerful like they say because if he was people in this world would not be suffering. In this examination of god the audience is shown how god cannot be all good therefore he is either unworthy or god is fictionNeuroscientist, philosopher, and best-selling author Sam Harris argues about the existence of a god. He appeals to the logic of basic facts proving that there is no evidence showing the existence of a…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meaning In Mystic River

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Happy endings are presumed to belong to the realm of fantasy. In real life, after all, even a thumping electoral victory is generally more a first act than a last; what ensues, much too often, is disappointment, broken promises and even murmurs of a recall. When the believer, in any faith, tells us that the reward for bloody sacrifice is eternal joy, the nonbeliever is often tempted to think that the believer is merely trying to justify the ways of God to man. On earth at least, the end of life is death.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Our world is filled with corruption; this proves that there is no God if he cannot help us by preventing evil. The argument of evil basically states that God and evil cannot coincide. There are two types of evil; moral, which is carried out by humans through immoral actions that cause pain and suffering such as murder, rape and so forth. Natural evil is the second type which occurs through inevitable phenomenon’s such as natural disasters; hurricanes, tsunamis and diseases are a few (Sober, 120).…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Problem of Evil Lyndsey Emry PHIL 1381-17 Introduction to Philosophy Professor Bannister The problem of evil is the problem of reconciling the existence of the evil in the world with the existence of an omniscient God because if God were all-knowing, it seems that God would know about all of the horrible things that happen in our world. The problem of evil also brings up the problem with an omnipotent God because if God were all-powerful, God would be able to stop all of the evil and suffering in the world. Furthermore, the problem of evil also challenges an omnibenevolent God because if God were morally perfect, then surely God would want to do something about it.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Exploratory Essay

    • 2687 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To achieve this goal, I have organized my paper into four main sections. One of them is about God’s existence, two of them is the points of view about God and religion. And I described atheists’ perspective and theists.’ And the lasting thing I wrote is about the negative effect of religion on our society.…

    • 2687 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    When considering whether or not it is rational to fear death, I argue that the fear of death is an irrational fear. In order to support my argument, I will consider three main reasons why people fear death and how the fear of death ties directly to the badness that is believed of death. I will also outline Epicurus’ point of view on death and the reason for my own personal belief that death is not to be feared.…

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death by Nagel

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At the beginning of Death, Thomas Nagel questions: “If death is the unequivocal and permanent end to our existence, the question arises whether it is a bad thing to die.” Nagel wonders whether death is evil or not. To some people, like the hedonists, death is not bad. They propose the idea that a person is harmed when he or she has an unpleasant mental state. Furthermore, the hedonists also think a person is harmed when he or she suffers, and somebody is suffered when he or she is alive. Hence, when a person dies, he or she cannot be harmed. Death is the end of a subject. However, Nagel does not agree with the hedonists. He believes death is evil. The author introduces the objections of the hedonist as an opposing voice to argue against the idea that death is not evil.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays