Preview

The Iraq War Was Unjustified

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
861 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Iraq War Was Unjustified
The Iraq War was Unjustified
University of Phoenix
MU11COM09
September 9, 2011
Comm/215 Essentials of College writing The Iraq War was Unjustified

There are many reasons why the war Iraq was unjustified. Until today, Iraq has not been found to have weapons of mass destruction. There are beliefs that former President George W. Bush simply waged war on Iraq because of their oil. Iraq as a country and the former President Saddam Hussein had no link to al-Qaeda terrorist group. The United States congress, based on wrong intelligence from the Bush’s administration agreed unanimously to go to war with Iraq, despite the fact that the Unites Nations disagreed with the decision. Because of the decision to wage war on Iraq, The United States lost most of its allies. “A war on Iraq for the purpose of “regime change” would not be a legal war under international law. Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter states: “All members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purpose of the United Nations.” (Miller, 2003).
On September 11, 2001, two planes crashed into the World Trade Center. Many Americans died because of the deadly attack. It was one of the deadliest attacks on U.S soil. One plane crashed into part of the pentagon, and the another plane crashed into an open field. Based on these attacks by the al-Qaeda terrorist group, President Bush declared war on the Taliban in Afghanistan in an attempt to capture the 9/11 master-mind Osama Bin Laden. Approximately two years later, Bush also declared war on Iraq because of misleading information that Saddam Hussein harbored weapons of mass destruction.
The 2003 Iraq War lasted less than three weeks. It began in the early morning hours of March 20, when American missiles struck Baghdad. By April 9, U.S. forces had advanced into Baghdad. By April 15 Iraqi leader



References: Cost of war to the United States. (September, 2011). Cost of war. Retrieved from http://www.costofwar.com Farley, J. E. (February, 2004). An American attack on Iraq is Not Justified. Opposing viewpoints, 45. Retrieved from http://www.coursework.info/social_studies/politics/international relations Iraq body count. (September, 2011). Retrieved from http://www.iraqbodycount.org Miller, A. (January, 2003). 101 reasons Not to Go to War with Iraq. Retrieved from http://work.colm.edu/~amiller/pp012103

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There is much controversy surrounding the war in Iraq, both in terms of its legality, its practicality and its current course. Within all of these elements there are arguments to be found that suggest that the troops currently in Iraq should indeed come home. The main argument for bringing home the troops is that they shouldn't have been there in the first place, as no weapons of mass destruction were found, and they are now doing virtually nothing to help the situation, and may indeed be worsening it.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President George Bush’s letter to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein is, at least on the surface, a persuasive piece intended to convince the Iraqi leader to withdraw his forces from occupied Kuwait before war breaks out. Upon closer reading, however, the critical reader will see that Bush’s "argument" is, in fact, not much of a rational argument (let alone a convincing one), which is odd in that Bush himself repeatedly points out that much is at stake. The superficiality of the American President’s argument leads one to seek out other more likely purposes.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kagan, Robert & Kristol, William. "Why We Went to War." 20 Oct. 2003. The Weekly Standard. 1 Mar. 2005. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/236jmcbd.asp…

    • 1671 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many pros and cons to this decision. Some pro’s are that Iraq is a threat to the United states and that there is a possible tie between them and al qaeda and the 9/11 attack. Also because of the united nations resolution violations. Some cons to this decision are that the war was not legal and was not completed without the backing of the united nations, also it’s a financial burden(the war costed over 2 trillion). And that we invaded Iraq to harvest there oil.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Evinger, Barbara, and Cheryl Bourassa. "Counterpoint: Military Attacks Are Only Justified in Response to an Attack by Another State." Points of View (2008). Ebscohost.com. Points of View, 16 Sept. 2008. Web. 21 May 2012.…

    • 1384 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The points seem to follow well with one another, and most of the points are explained well. The paper is very easy for the reader to comprehend. The use of quotes throughout the paper are well-selected and powerful in helping to persuade readers of the theory; quotes such as the remarks from Colin Powell and Mark Wolfowitz are the most convincing in proving the points they follow. The background information given (like the information about Cheney’s help in the George Bush administration and the reasons for continued speculation on the whereabouts of nuclear weapons in Iraq) helps the reader to understand the situation. The arguments about the United States’ desire for more access to oil in Iraq were extremely convincing in and of…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all, the majority of the Democrats and Republicans in Washington believed that Iraq was developing chemical and biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction. This was threatening to the world, since Iraq has used chemical weapons before during the war with Iran. However, Iraq did not use weapons of mass destruction during the Gulf war. After the Gulf war, there was a truce that Iraq had to dispose weapons of mass destruction under the supervision of the United Nations (U.N.) and an inspection system was set up. However, by the mid-90`s Saddam Hussein delayed or even denied inspectors access to possible weapons-development sites they wanted to visit. Other reasons to attack Iraq were that Saddam Hussein was an enemy of the U.S., he started two aggressive wars in the region of Iraq, and Saddam brutally oppressed his own people. Moreover, after the terrorist attack on the U.S. on 9/11, Bush was wanted to invade Iraq to combat terrorism. In sum, the motives of the United States to invade Iraq were that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, Saddam suppressed his people and because Iraq supported international terrorism, especially al –Qaeda. Therefore the U.S. wanted to take Saddam down and help the Iraqi people to establish a democracy there. He asked authorization of the U.N. and asked to justify this invasion.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1991 the United States went to war against Saddam Hussein with one goal. This goal was to get the Iraqi army out of Kuwait. The Iraq economy hadn’t been the best and Kuwait had oil, so Hussein argued that Kuwait belonged to Iraq and invaded. This invasion started what was known as the Gulf War. Once the U.S. achieved their goal, they withdrew and left Hussein in power under one condition, and that was for him to eliminate and weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs in Iraq. In November 2002 when the United Nations were still unsure that these programs had been removed, the United States gave Hussein an ultimatum: By December seventh, any WMD programs must be removed. He failed to do so, and in March of 2003, the United States invaded Iraq. Now, the question remains: Was this invasion justified? The answer is yes, because Saddam Hussein could not be trusted by the U.S., he treated the Iraqi citizens poorly, and Iraq may have had WMD.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Is War Ever Justified?

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    "Never think that war, no matter how necessary, nor how justified, is not a crime." - Ernest Hemingway. Is war ever justified? Well that depends on how much you value your freedom. When the United States entered the war in Afghanistan, many people criticized President Bush as if he was the responsible for the war itself. What those people don 't see is that if we hadn 't entered the war, we 'd be ducking under bullets or watching for IED 's on highways. Years after the 9/11 attacks, people still don 't realize that there is a terrorist organization trying to kill Americans, and Bush has done a good job protecting us. I do agree that some of his methods weren 't necessary, but he has done his best defending the millions that hate him. That 's a reason why war would be considered justified.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the piece, " The U.S. Invasion of Iraq Was Not Justified," Mr. Michael T. Klare argues that there is no possible way to justify the invasion of Iraq by the United States government. He objects nearly every conceivable justification for the invasion; namely, the argument that the Bush Administration never had evidence of Weapons of Mass Destruction. He objectively blames the Bush Administration for the deaths of American soldiers, only to be followed almost mimicking the statistic that tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians have lost their lives as well. He blames it all on Bush. During the piece, I had to force myself to wrap my brain around the stretches Mr. Klare was willing to take to disband the notion that the…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Center for American Progress (January 29, 2004) "In Their Own Words: Iraq 's 'Imminent ' Threat"…

    • 4519 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to argue that there was no humanitarian cause for the invasion of Iraq. I agree with Ken Roth’s analysis that the war in Iraq was not for humanitarian purposes and I would subsidize my reasoning with Peter Singer’s ideas of utilitarianism and consequentialism. I will first look at Ken Roth’s analysis; secondly I will analyze Peter Singer’s argument and apply it to Ken Roth’s analysis. Finally, I will synthesize my position with the previous analysis and argument to prove my thesis.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    desert storm

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The purpose of this Essay is to gain a better perspective on Operation Desert Storm and gain a better understanding on what brought upon this war why did Saddam want to control kuwait's oil, and what input did the United States have into starting and ending this War?…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2003 Invasion of Iraq

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To understand why the United States invaded Iraq in 2003 we must first analyze the past these two countries have with each other. The United States has had heated relations with Iraq for some time now. It all started in 1979, when President Bakr resigned making the vice president Saddam Hussein president. It was under Hussein’s control in which most of the tension between the United States and Iraq was caused. Under the Carter administration the U.S. State department listed Iraq as a state that sponsors terrorism the same year Hussein came into power. This is when Iraq began its downward spiral. Whether is was capturing his own Iraqi people to use as dummies in chemical war fare testing or using chemical weapons in the Iraq-Iran war, someone had to step in and police Hussein’s rule.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Iraq War

    • 1798 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There is no seldom-clear way to determine the justification for war but for centuries philosophers have used just war theory to assess the morality of it. Essentially, just war theory is a set ethical principals used to assess war. Just war theory is split into two categories: ‘the right to go to war’ (jus ad bellum) and ‘right conduct in war’ (jus de bellum). While assessing the Iraq War, jus ad bellum (JAB) will be referred too in order to determine U.S’s justification for declaring war. JAB consists of six criterion, which all must be met in order for a declaration of war to be classified as morally just. The first and most significant criterion, especially in the case of Iraq War, is that the state must have a just cause to engage in war. Secondly only a legitimate authority can declare war, meaning that it must be declared by a political system that allows distinctions of justice. The next criterion establishes that a state must have rightful intentions when fighting said war. Furthermore a war must show proportionality in the balance between good and harm it does, essentially the benefits of winning must out weigh the costs of fighting. The last two criteria of JAB are that war must be a state’s last resort and the state must have a reasonable chance of success before the war is declared (Lee 70) The following assessment of the Iraq War’s ability…

    • 1798 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays