Preview

The Internet: Censorship Versus Human Rights

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
379 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Internet: Censorship Versus Human Rights
Internet: Censorship versus Human Rights
Jesslyn Sung 10/02/2011

What is your ideal picture of a free-speech internet where your human rights as are prioritized?
Since Hillary Clinton’s landmark speech last year, "Remarks on internet Freedom", the net today promotes a more open internet with human rights. The internet revolution is further supported by the social networks services such as Facebook and Twitter, where people’s right of freedom of speech and expression seemed to be ungovernable. However, the ongoing Wikileaks has trialed and tried to expose the Australian government’s loyalty towards this principle.
On 3rd February 2011, Australian communication minister, Stephen Conroy, was asked whether or not the Australian government is going to cut off the internet access in cases like the Egyptian crisis in order to escape from protestors. In response, Conroy assured the mass media that such phenomena could never happen in Australia.
“…Australia’s a vibrant democracy, where the government doesn’t control the internet…”
If so, what are internet censorships and blockings for?
This is the propaganda of internet freedom in Australia. Australian government takes full control of the filtering process of the internet contents. Wikileaks had once exposed Australian’s secret Internet blacklist which is believed to prevent child pornography, but some blacklisted sites was said to have nothing to do with it. Who then sets the internet content criteria for Australian net? The net-censorships created certain boundaries which indirectly limit our liberal rights. The freedom of expression in internet should have included the right to post freely in public, and to be listened by anyone who cares to listen. With the government involvement in approving or disapproving internet contents, this principle of free speech becomes pointless. Australian censorship policies have contradicted with the principle of internet freedom they are suggesting. How is this



Bibliography: http://www.zdnet.com.au/govt-can-t-scorn-blackout-given-filter-efa-339308977.htm http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2011/02/conroy-not-fooling-anyone-on-an-open-internet/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Censorship is just like a double-edge sword. If used properly, it serves as a valuable weapon. Governments and other regulatory institutions must learn to use it judiciously.…

    • 2355 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Killswitch Documentary

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Internet has become a popular source of mainstream media. A battle is raging over the control of the Internet, and the rights of the American people are at stake. The documentary Killswitch, exposes the true power of the Internet and how the government is controlling that power; violating freedom of speech and the right to privacy. The documentary takes a stand in favor of Net Neutrality, which is the principle that the Internet enables access to all-content without choosing or blocking certain websites. The efforts of Aaron Swartz and Edward Snowden to win back Internet freedom are highlighted in this documentary in order to appeal to American citizens to take action in favor of Net Neutrality. “Freedom is embedded in technology and we have to protect technology if we want to protect our freedom” (Killswitch). Internet regulation grants power to the Government and violates constitutional rights of Americans hindering the Nation’s founding principle of democracy.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The congressman, Mcinnes, school principal, and Michael Anti all were involved in different situation of censorship and all have different views whether supporting or opposing censorship. The congressman who disapprove the violence in the television because he does not want children watching people fight or die, even though it’s not real. Whereas the principals from the schools enforced their disapproval of their school newspaper for its inappropriate topics. On the other hand, Gavin Mcinnes believed that people should be able to choose and decide whether or not to watch or read something. Michael Anti enlightens censorship of the Chinese internet and how censorship is used as isolation. The Supreme Court Justices ruled their case dealing with censorship as whether continuing the newspaper on school grounds articles be offensive or no newspaper. The Supreme Court is the mediator between supporting and opposing…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the past twenty or so years information has largely been stored in digital form, providing the current generation of digital natives with access to more and more information in recent years. With this new flow of information available to the public has come increased censoring by the government. However, this is not a new issue as some might believe. Since the first primitive government was established information has been shielded and manipulated from the every day citizens of the world by those in power. The cause fought against information censorship enjoys the same past. For as long as information has been censored there have been those who have fought against it (Newth, 2010). This issue has arisen particularly in the United States, as some believe access to any information that exists is a right protected by the Constitution.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “In 2001, the International Telecommunication Union calculated that, approximately 2.3 billion people had internet access at the end of that year. Since then, the percentage of people using the internet around the world has continued to grow” (Li 2). Censoring the internet has been a hot topic for quite a while now. Many people believe that censoring the web isn’t a good thing because of certain laws and rights we have as citizens. The internet has some cons but it also has many pros. The downside of the censorship is that the truth is blocked out and it violates our freedom of speech. On the other hand, censorship of the internet can reduce the numbers or even stop human trafficking, prevent identity theft, stop cyber bullying and so much…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    (Oliver) On paper ISP’s are not admitting to censorship, however in practice they would be taking away everything unique about the internet. Furthermore censorship of the internet is censorship of the arts; it takes away everything from binge viewing cat GIFs to Netflix movie marathons. If we have learned anything about permitting censorship is that it destroys culture. In 1642 the English parliament destroyed English theater by banning performances across England due to the sex and violence found in famous works from play writers like Shakespeare.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Censorship, in true form, is the systematic banning of books, the Internet, or other literature due to content that has been deemed inappropriate. In the United States, it is used widely in the context of adolescent literature. Resistors to this movement often claim that the government is violating many children’s first amendment rights. Numerous cases have been brought. Others find this act of restricting material devastating to the education system. Censorship has infringed on children’s first amendment rights and has violated the civil liberties of American youth.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    We all want the Internet to be fun and safe place where everyone can go and enjoy the great benefits it offers. Pro-censorship groups do not want to see someone’s freedom of speech to be taken away from them. Every citizen is guaranteed even if it is on the Internet. Likewise, anti-censorship groups do not want children being exposed to inappropriate…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Censorship In Canada

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In some parts of the world or even in history, totalitarian societies like this existed and thrived at one point or another as, within their society, not a lot of people knew the truth and could fight the censorship their government was doing. During Hitler’s reign, censorship of all free forms of communications and educated materials was how Hitler basically brainwashed the younger generations of Germans into hating the Jewish. Propaganda was a massive contributor in censorship, as works like Mein Kampf, Der Giftpilz and Trust no Fox were published and read in schools, at home, or anywhere to ensure that the political power had perfectly manipulated a country into believing things they shouldn’t have. This is the insidious side of censorship, the side that enables a government's power over people based on how well they can manipulate a person’s rights. This sad fact is the reason censorship should be fought against; no one should ever be brainwashed into thinking that their rights aren’t as essential because the government has told them so. In modern day China, there’s a heavy amount of censorship that goes on, most of it being media related, from going to the movies all the way up to even texting someone, the government is able to access it all. In Canada, we are lucky enough to not have a pervasive system like this, but if we don’t take action now, who is to say that Canada couldn’t end up like Australia or even America when it comes to censorship - intrusive systems that have no use in protecting one’s…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Leatherman, Brian. "Internet Censorship and the Freedom of Speech." Internet Censorship and the Freedom of Speech. American University, 19 Dec. 1999. Web. 29 Oct. 2014.…

    • 1984 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Certain people feel as though the Internet should be governmentally regulated and censored in order to protect the youth of America. Censorship is a possible way for the powerful or those who sit in chair of position to destroy individualism, wisdom, and the marketplace of ideas. It means less freedom. If individual are prevented from exploring other thoughts and ideas then they are prevented from knowledge and power. “Wikinomics” states that a survey published by the Rasmussen Reports, found that 49% of Americans believe that the federal government should regulate the Internet the same way as radio and television. Forms of information communication such as television and radio have battled with the Supreme Court over what freedom of speech in the First Amendment really implies.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech or of the press …” as defined by the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America (U.S. Constitution). The majority of democratic governments around the world are adopting similar doctrine to solidify the principles of their governmental structures (Hodges 3). One prime example, Canada, has followed the lead of the United States and granted citizens freedom of speech with untold limitations on its usage. These limitations have been implemented based on overwhelming abuse of the freedom of speech, especially when viewed from the angle of its use in cyberspace. Unfortunately freedom of speech is inherently a global issue because of the rapid accessibility and the relevance in today’s society (Hodges 5). In response, Canada and the United States are becoming exceedingly cautious and implementing various preventative techniques (Sim). When viewing the ethical and moral issues involved with materials in cyberspace, it’s a reasonable assumption that “free” should not be truly free and additional measures should be placed in order to monitor inappropriate activity.…

    • 1792 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whenever any major events happen, the first way many people of the younger generations find out is through a link or post on a website. When service providers can limit traffic and content, however, this interconnectivity of nations will be broken. According to Emma Cano in “Saving the Internet: Why Regulating Broadband Providers Can Keep the Internet Open,” published in the Brigham Young University Law Review, when ISPs are allowed to place their own restrictions on content and applications, it will break down the aspects of the Internet that help encourage this interconnectivity and sharing of information (723). Recently, it has been found that ISPs are using JavaScript, a tool that is commonly used for video displays, to inject code directly onto the user’s computer and display ads. Combining this with the monitoring of user’s browsing, this could create a way for ISPs to decide what content the user sees. Instead of important news stories or other useful content, ISPs could instead choose to show advertisements or to not even allow the content to be viewed at all. The lack of regulation would allow for these circumstances to occur, and if they were to entire nations could potentially be cut off from the rest of the world in terms of relevancy of…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Censorship is well needed within schools in order to assure that the minds of students are strictly focused on educational websites, but not to such an extreme.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the Liberal party and the Greens do not support this scheme and the idea infuriates numerous Australians. This is evident through the petitions and discussions made by outraged Australians attacking the idea of a compulsory filter on the internet. The Labor party are the only people who truly support the plan and some family-orientated groups are also encouraging it as they have children, but they are forgetting the reality that there are many citizens without kids. The main reason this proposal hasn’t been completely discarded yet is because the Labor party is determined that we as Australians require this for our own benefit, regardless of the number of countless people that disagree with it. The fact that our own government will not take into account the opinions of the people that are actually affected by their ideas is extremely alarming. Despite being almost universally condemned by the public, ISPs, State Governments, Media and censorship experts, Communications Minister Stephen Conroy is determined to force this filter into your home. What we want to avoid is to degraded into an almost autocratic-like system of government similar to countries like China, Iran and North Korea where internet censorship is…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays