The Intelligence Cycle

The intelligence cycle is taught to all new analysts stepping into the intelligence community. It is basically a circle moving from one step to the next and then, rinse and repeat. According to Keithly (2010), “The process generally divides intelligence efforts into six phases: (1) direction and planning, (2) collection, (3) processing and exploitation, (4) production, (5) dissemination and integration, and (6) continuous evaluation” (p. 2). It would be important to remember these phases revolve around a mission, the nucleus of the function. Other agencies, like the FBI and CIA have their own models, but they mirror the same intent.

The intelligence cycle works as explained and understood. However, the number one flaw is dissemination. This is based on my time conducting intelligence. Dissemination was and still is the number one complaint. During the process, the art of the intelligence cycle should not be limited to any textbook unless it is law. This is similar to an infantryman relying on their specific field manual. They will not be considered
The intelligence cycle in high paced joint locations has evolved to produce an effective and efficient process. To expand on this my model would be with some additions.

I would formally add one phase to the intelligence cycle. It would start with the nucleus of the cycle, mission. The tasked job or specific question would be the hub of the following phases: 1) planning and direction, 2) collection, 3) processing and exploitation, 4) analysis and production, 5) Dissemination, 6) Feedback. The purpose of adding feedback has multiple reasons. It is essential to know whether the work performed was satisfied or not. Feedback is missing in many reports preventing true reevaluation. Analysts want or should know how their product, resulted, actioned, and impacted the