Preview

The Inevitability of Animal Testing in Medicine

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1273 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Inevitability of Animal Testing in Medicine
Dan Wang(Irene) Animal test in medicine is inevitable In 1960s, about 10,000 babies who have short and malfunctioned legs and arms were born, surprising the public and scientists. People were worried and anxious to know the reason for the tragedy and the way to avoid the birth of defect babies. After many researches, scientists found out that the disabled babies were born to the mother who had taken a medicine called Thalidomide, a drug people used to deal with pregnant reaction, and was later proved to have teratogenicity to many animals by animal test. Then, people realized that animal test must be done before the drug used in treatment to avoid such accident. After several decades, animal test is still inevitable because it helps improve the medical science and is irreplaceable in medical science. Some people disagree with animal test because they think animal is crucial and not fair to animals. However, they may not fully understand the meaning of the animal test and the irreplaceability of animal test in medical science.

First of all, animal test is the most effective experimental method in medical science. Animal test is still the most reliable method because animals share many commons with human. For instance, the rats share about 90% of human genes and humans and chimpanzees are 99% genetically identical. So, most of the physiological reactions happened in human body and animal body are the same. Thus, the results of test animal are reliable in most cases. Moreover, the importance of animal test has been proved by the achievements obtained by using animal test. As we know, all kinds of new drugs need animal test to prove that they are non-toxic before they are used in treatment. By using animal test, more than 20 kinds of new drugs are introduced to the market every year in USA. If we don’t use animal test, volunteers would be the only way to test drugs. However, the number of volunteers is limited, because it is very difficult to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Leonard Thompson Biography

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Scientists are constantly looking for new medical advances that they hope will save people’s lives and often turn to animals as the optimal resource for testing new ideas and products. These animals range from rats and mice to dogs and monkeys. On top of varying animals, the tests they run fluctuate from simply checking the effectiveness of a medicine already in use to testing an entirely new form of treatment. However, there have beens years of controversy over the morality of using animals as the test subjects.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In addition, the journal talks about animal’s biological components that have different reactions to a disease, drug compound, and substance. Sherre Stachura also talks about different alternative processes available that can substitute animal testing that is cheaper and more reliable.…

    • 110 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, technology has replaced the need for almost all types of animal experimentation. These alternative testing methods are producing more efficient results and are eliminating the horrors and inhumanity associated with traditional animal testing. Many people are rejecting alternative methods because they are new and unorthodox. However, alternative methods of testing do not mean putting humans at risk. They do not mean putting a halt on medical progress. Rather, non-animal testing will greatly improve the quality and humaneness of our toxicity testing and drug…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many of the world's pharmaceuticals are tested on a variety of animals from dogs to rats. The physiological and genetic similarities an animal's has with humans, allows them to be the perfect test subject. Even the most obscure similarity can warrant a licence to test on animals…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why would somebody want to abuse or hurt animals for no reason? Animals are locked up, tortured, and killed all over the world due to chemical experiments for products. Animal testing should be banned because it endangers animals and does not serve a legitimate purpose in society.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is rarely successful since animals have different physiologies than humans. There has been many studies that have shown inaccuracy and unsuccess in animal testing. Studies show, “90 percent of medications approved for human use after animal testing later proved ineffective or harmful to humans in clinical trials” (Stop Animal Testing) and also, “Animal-tested drugs have killed, disabled or harmed millions of people and lead to costly delays as well” (Stop Animal Testing). It is evident that animal testing lacks accuracy and has dangerous consequences, therefore it should no longer be…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the topic of animal testing, most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of whether it helps researchers to find new drugs and treatments suitable for humans. Whereas some are convinced that it does help researchers find new drugs and treatments, others maintain that some drugs tested on animals may never actually be useful or even safe for human consumption. In my own view the results of animals testing are unreliable because animals and humans are not genetically or anatomically alike to one another.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing: the Facts

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Why should animals not have the same rights that humans do? Maybe because they cannot talk, read books, or drive cars, but neither can some humans for that matter. So why is it that when an experiment, which was conducted to help treat type 2 diabetes, killed 203 people, it was halted immediately, although millions of animals die each year due to scientific experimentation? The answer is that many believe that animals are worthless or are not worth as much as human beings are, so they are therefore dispensable. The problem with that is animals are living things just like humans. Therefore, like human beings, they understand fear and experience pain. They also feel excitement and happiness. So why should they be denied the same basic rights that humans have? The answer to that question is that they should not be. Animals deserve the same rights that humans have, so testing that jeopardizes animal life, and safety should come to a cease immediately in the same way that it would if the same testing were to be conducted on human beings.…

    • 2040 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    find treatment for anything from cancer to pain. If the results have a possibility to save so many…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1930s, Hitler passed anticruelty laws against animals in Germany. This seems strange considering the way Hitler treated humans during World War II. Various life-saving procedures have been discovered and perfected by animal testing. “How would you feel if the one research project that may save your child’s life was priced out of existence because pound animals were banned from testing” (Rowan 93). Without animal testing, humans would have to face the negative effects drugs and products can have before being perfected for human use. Some think animal testing is cruel although the provides endless advances.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is a major debate in today’s society, but it is not just a problem of today. Animal testing dates back the 1800’s when Charles Darwin's evolutionary theory served to suggest that animals could serve as effective models to facilitate biological understanding in humans. Other cases of animal testing include psychological experiments such as the one by Ivan Pavlov in the late nineteenth century. He conducted experiments on dogs to demonstrate how dogs could be conditioned with regards to memory and repetitive tasks, but the first major reference to animal testing occurred in the late nineteenth century when Louis Pasteur gave anthrax to sheep and showed the importance of vaccines with his germ theory. (Murnaghan, Screen 1) Major…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists have been using animals to conduct experiments and tests since ancient times. Over the years, the practice of using animals has been under fire by animal protection and animal activist groups. Using animals for drug testing has become an important part of scientific experiments but it has also led to the deaths of millions of animals. When animal testing goes wrong, it can harm the users whom it is supposedly benefiting. The use of animal testing should be abandoned because it does not predict accurate results in human beings, it kills animals, and there are alternate testing methods that exist which do not involve the use of animals.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Inhumane

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Research can be done in a tube or container that contains human cells and tissues which is an exceptional substitute as opposed to animal testing. This method contains more advantages, including efficient simplification and improved accuracy of eventuality. Computerized testing is another method which collects data records and side effects of particular drugs and chemicals without any unnecessary pain towards a living animal. Computer models can easily replicate a human, which can simulate increasingly precise results of medicines and diseases, as well as furthering our knowledge and understanding of the effects. Although it is commonly claimed that the outcome of a distinctive trial will have no effect on an animal, it is not proven to have the same ramifications on a person. The apparent benefits from the tests are not proven to be adequate or safe for human use or consumption. Various government agencies have filed reports clearly stating that animal testing is not accurately measured or evaluated for substantial reliability and…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is a very huge controversy and many people have an opinion on it. Some people wan animal testing to stop due to safety hazards and concerns for the animals, while others aren't so concerned about it, since testing it make it better for everyone. Animal testing used to be deemed necessary but not people can't be so sure. I personally believe that animal testing should continue and i will later state my reasons why. first, what exactly are the pros and cons of animal testing? Testing Animals has many good and bad reasons.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    American Animal Testing

    • 2312 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Economist article, “Be Nice to Mice… Animal Testing,” notes that only one in every ten drugs tested on animals actually works on humans. This is because they are fed a lot to keep their bodies warm since they are kept in cool conditions. The cool conditions are said to keeps their temper at bay. But eating as much as they do alters the way they metabolize the drug. There are many different factors that are involved that make animal testing results difficult to translate into a hypothesis for what human results would be. James-Enger, author of Vegetarian Times article “Beyond Animal Testing,” states that using animals to predict how humans will react to the same drug or medical treatment is not a good experiment due to the difference in anatomy between humans and animals. Even testing animals with similar DNA, like chimpanzees, is not a good test because they do not react the same way as humans. For example, chimps, being our closest relatives, still did not contract AIDS when introduced to the HIV virus (Kelly). Another faulty test occurred when testing a drug called fenphen. Animals showed no serious side effects, but when tested on humans it caused heart-valve defects and was taken off the market (Kelly). There are quite a few recalls due to the inaccuracy of animal experimentation. It has also been prevalent that many tests have been over tested for no…

    • 2312 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays