Preview

The Indian Removal Act: The First Settlers

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1651 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Indian Removal Act: The First Settlers
When most people think of the history in the United States, many think of the first settlers, Christopher Columbus, Lewis and Clark, and the Pilgrims. Indians were visibly the first people to settle in the United States, and the many to be taken away from their sacred motherland. White Americans had said that they feared the Indians because they we’re aliens who took over land, more so savages, heathens and barbarians (Minges, 454). President Andrew Jackson was the one who stood out to people, trying his best to make executive decisions to help his nation and that led to the removal the Indians from their land. In 1830, Jackson had signed a very important document which enforced the Indian Removal Act. The Act had affected five “Civilized …show more content…
The women and children were driven from their homes. The greedy white men, even went to the graves of the ancestors and dug up any jewelry or ornaments that were buried with the dead (Minges, 467). The twenty thousand Indians were divided into separate groups of equal size of about one thousand (Thorton, 293). Each detachment started at different times, usually one year apart and then the others would accordingly follow. The aged, sick and the young had rode in wagons, which consisted of some goods and bedding (Minges, 467). The others had traveled by foot and this trip was made during the dead of winter. Author Ethan Davis, claims that this particular winter was “one of the coldest periods ever known in the country” (Davis, 100) Many had died from the exposure from sleet or snow. Author Patrick Minges states, “Those who lived to make this trip, or had parents who made it, will long remember it, as a bitter memory” (Minges, 467). A Georgia volunteer was later to say about the cruelty of the Indians, “I fought through the civil war and have seen men shot to pieces and slaughtered by thousands, but the Cherokee removal was the cruelest work I ever knew (Minges, 467)”. The U.S. troops gathered several Indians as well as some African slaves and put them in what is similar to a concentration camp, they were kept as what Minges says “pigs in a sty” …show more content…
John Ross, the leader of the Removal Act strongly disagreed to the Cherokee’s giving up their lands. Ross knew that white men would keep a close eye on him or they would continue to return to their lands if he did not do something about it. Ross had gone “away” for a short period of time and during that time the government had signed a treaty at New Echota, which was the Cherokee Nation capital. This treaty agreed to sell the U.S. government all tribal lands in the east in exchange for five million dollars and land in the west. Ross had argued that this treaty was done illegally. Not to mention that there was more than one route to the Trail of Tears. The first group of Cherokees had actually departed in Tennessee in June of 1838 and headed to Indian Territory by boat that had taken them through four state rivers including Tennessee, Ohio, Mississippi, and Arkansas (Thorton,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Trail of Tears

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The author, Dee Brown, gives a brief description about Andrew Jackson’s policy on Indian removal in order to gain popularity and power. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the cause and effects of “Indian Removal” during Jackson’s terms, ultimately creating the “Trail of Tears.” As early as the colonial period Indian removal was evident, Brown claims. Indians never really got along with white settlers, and even if they tried to resolve the conflicts, it would fail. Indian Removal calmed down over time but in 1828, Andrew Jackson ran for president and immediately knew he would have to wipe out the frontier states. He made a treaty in which the Indians had to remove themselves from the states and move west toward the Mississippi. On there “trip” to the Mississippi, Indians faced many hardships that included starvation, death, and disease.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cherokee Removal Summary

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Cherokee Removal directs attention to an assortment of documents presenting several important themes and main points such as the discussions within the Cherokee Nation, Georgia’s role in pressurizing the Cherokees off the land and settlers pleading to the US government to remove them by way of force. The "civilizing" of the Cherokees (their adoption of European culture), the national debate between promoters and opponents of expulsion, and a brief look at the deportation itself are all discussed at length. One of the reasons I have enjoyed Perdue’s book thus far is because of how in-depth the book goes. Examples of this can be found on pages 50-53 where it actually displays the Cherokee census of 1835. I thought examining this document…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ronal Takaki opens our eyes to a different view of one of our early presidents. Andrew Jackson was for removing the Indians, “He supported the efforts of Mississippi and Georgia to abolish Indian tribal units and allow white settlers to take cultivated Indian lands” (Takaki, 2008. Pg. 81). He believed that the deaths of Indians meant that America was advancing civilization. Andrew did not feel guilty about what he stood for. Although they were laws that protected the Indians and their land, he did not obey them. Instead, he would ignore them, “Supreme Court ruled that…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John L. O’Sullivan had said, “‘... our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions.’” (www.britanica.com) During Andrew Jackson’s term, America had set its sights on the untamed West - which, inconveniently, happened to be the Indians’ territory. President Jackson decided to create a controversial treaty that would allow America to exchange the Indians’ land for a large piece of land in the Louisiana Territory. It was created on May 28, 1830 and sparked much criticism and support throughout the nation. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because the Indians were enemies of America, they were given good land, and they were offered the government’s protection.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Age of Jackson Dbq

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, dictating that all Indians living in the Deep South had to move to Eastern Oklahoma, because the Indians had something everyone else wanted, land. Jackson says in his First Inaugural Address,“It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy, and to give that humane and considerate attention to their rights and their wants which is consistent with the habits of our Government and the feelings of our people.” Jackson is saying that It will be his genuine and continuous desire towards the Indian tribes, and we want to give them a fair and open policy, and give humane and kind attention to their rights and their wants which is the same with the habits of our government and the feelings of our people. He wants to give the Indian tribes a good policy. Later on, he removes the Indian tribes from their homes in the Deep South and makes them march on the trail of tears, where they relocate to Eastern Oklahoma.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unfortunately, despite how precisely Indians followed white men’s laws and requirements, the Indian Removal would have eventually transpired. The Five Civilized Tribes shed their Indian traditions and culture to take on the Americans way of life. Indians not only adopted principles in government and agriculture, but also religiously. Despite all of this, whites still wanted to kick Indians out of their lands in order to bring profit to themselves. Even the national government could not terminate the Indian Removal. Through both the United States Constitution and Worcester v. Georgia, the national government declared that states could not operate the removal of Indians. All of this, illustrates the inhumanity and lack of compassion whites had…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokee Removal is a brief history with documents by Theda Perdue and Michael Green. In 1838-1839 the US troops expelled the Cherokee Indians from their ancestral homeland in the Southeast and removed them to the Indian Territory in what is now Oklahoma. The removal of the Cherokees was a product of the demand for land during the growth of cotton agriculture in the Southeast, the discovery of gold on the Cherokees land, and the racial prejudice that many white southerners had toward the Indians.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Jackson was the one who made this removal. He called it the Indian Removal. In 1830, the Indian Removal act was signed. Native Americans were forced to leave their lands. The Choctaw was the first one forced to leave. Thousands of people died. The removal kept on going.…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Treaty of New Echota, was signed by a faction of prominent Cherokee leaders, but not by the elected tribal leadership. In theory, this removal was supposed to be voluntary, and many American Indians did remain in the East. In practice, however, the Jackson administration put great pressure on tribal leaders to sign removal treaties. This pressure created bitter divisions within American Indian nations, as different tribal leaders advocated different responses to the question of removal. During the Treaty of New Echota U.S. government officials ignored tribal leaders who resisted signing removal treaties and dealt only with those who favored removal. Though the Trail of Tears took place during Van Buren's presidency, through Jackson's numerous removal acts such as the treaty of New Echota he set up the framework for the Trail of Tears. Van Buren's administration only had to enforce the Treaty of New Echota, which resulted in the deaths of an estimated 4,000 Cherokees on the Trail of Tears. Jackson had carried out his plans to relocate the Indians west of the Mississippi, and then some. His land policies were very unfair to Indian tribes, because they were not written for the tribes' advantages, but rather for the taking of their…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To start with, emotionally, the indians were already devastated that they had to leave their own land and their home, so as you can imagine, the trip was sorrowful, perhaps with many tears shed. No pun intended. Moreover, for the people that traveled by boat, the exposure to the weather greatly affected those people in a gruesome way. The weather cause “colds, pleurisy, fever and diarrhea.” As for the people that were forced to march all the way to Oklahoma, it was such an ambitious journey. Many people came down with fevers and dysentery. Furthermore, despite the General's order to use “every possible kindness in carrying out their taste” to his soldiers, quite the opposite was enforced. The army dragged out families from their homes, confiscated property, abused and hunted down indians, and some were also killed. Most because deceased due to the new exposure and illnesses they…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cherokee Tribe Case Study

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The end of removal resulted in as what was known as the “Trail of Tears”, this is the process of where the Americans began forced removal of the Native Americans. All of this was allowed under the terms and conditions of the Treaty of Echota. The terms stated that, “the Cherokees had two years to move to their new home in the west.”3 During this many Cherokee lives were lost due to the vulnerability to disease and the…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Imagine in today’s society, all of a certain minority being sent to Maine against their will while the public was cheering it on. It is incredibly immoral to do such a thing; yet in the early 1800’s this is basically what happened to the Cherokee Nation of Indians. Starting in 1814, Andrew Jackson wanted to move the Cherokee Indians from their ancestral homeland of North Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, and Alabama, to the present day state of Oklahoma. The Indian Nations traveled through the Trail of Tears to get to their forced new territory. They traveled in many different ways of transportation such as foot, horse, and wagon. Though many are informed of the horror of the Indian Removal Acts, the public seemed…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Andrew Jackson was greatly amiss in his measure to force the Indians out of their homes were their ancestors had lived in long ago. Thus because, he used brutal force and harsh conditions before and during the removal of the Indian tribes. “Men paid to move the Cherokee Nation are cruel”(Cherokee). This segment was published on April 4, 1838 along with other various articles, and explains that the Cherokee new that the government would not treat them with respect nor kindness. While disliked by the vast majority of Indians, most of the everyday people actually admired Jackson because they saw him as somewhat of a hero because he gave the perception that the Indians were uncivilized savages, and by removing them he…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even after the Supreme Court ruled it unlawful for the government to remove the Native Americans from their lands, President Andrew Jackson refused to enforce the law resulting from the ruling. From this action, the US government forcibly removed around 16,000 Cherokees from their land and forced them to walk the Trail of Tears. Around 4,000 of them perished on the 2,200-mile journey; starting at the southwest to Indian Territory, now called Oklahoma. However, the terror didn’t end once they had been relocated against their will. Cultural Genocide was committed against them next, the government forced the married couples to remarry in western attire, cut their hair, and forced the children to attend a boarding school away from their families to learn how to speak and write in English. The government’s excuse for these violations was they were trying to “Kill the Indian, Save the Man,”. Due to the government’s cruel action towards the Native Americans; for kicking them off their land for selfish reasons, such as land for new settlers and the discovery or iron ores, and the cultural genocide they were the root cause of, this action in history can be identified as…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The House of Representatives voted on May 24 and passed it, 102 to 97. Section 2 of the Indian Removal Act States “…That it shall and may be lawful for the President to exchange any or all of such districts, so to be laid off and described, with any tribe or nation of Indians now residing within the limits of any of the states or territories…” that is the main reason the act was so bad. Section 8 of the Indian Removal Act also says “...the sum of five hundred thousand dollars is hereby appropriated, to be paid out of any money in the treasury, not otherwise appropriated.”, that means that the government spent over $500,000 to move the Indians. The Cherokee had been given two years to vacate their homelands and move to a new “Indian Territory” in present-day…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays