Ordinary citizens with limited experience of the law acting like a judge deciding on guilt or innocence of an accused person. Involving legal laypersons and giving them power in finding a law is irresponsible. Deciding about somebody’s faith if guilty or innocent shout be put on professional hands. Only educated people versed with the law should take place in the jury. Too many innocent people were sentenced guilty and the prisons in the United States are jam-packed. It is not a surprise that the work as a jury member is unpopular. …show more content…
• How to recognize criminal behavior and which preventive measures and precautions to take.
• Relevant defenses to criminal activity and consequences committing a crime.
• Training the employees about crimes that will generate highest damage to the organization such as computer hacking, identity theft, economic espionage, credit card fraud…. etc.
• Educating employees about strategies and methods how to avoid or minimize exposure to damages and losses within the organization.
It is very crucial that all employees have understood how to be vigilant against criminal behavior. The training should be refreshed annually. Through tests and examination of each employee their understanding of criminal activity shout be evaluated and improved if necessary. Furthermore, the organization should monitor and audit its training program of its effectiveness based on the number of criminal activity