Preview

The Importance Of Public Works In Han China

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
313 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Importance Of Public Works In Han China
I. Introductory Paragraph
Although Han China and Rome shared the same attitudes regarding the importance of public works, with China devising the flood prevention system, and Rome creating the indispensable aqueducts, they had completely opposing views concerning tools used for crafts, with the Roman upper-class viewing such tools as demeaning and the Han China upper-class approving and encouraging such tools, especially after the invention of the mortar and pestle.

II. Importance for Public Works
A. Water seems to have been the main theme in both Roman and Chinese culture
B. Chinese devised an elaborate flood prevention system, and a water-powered blowing-engine and Romans created the aqueducts.
C. Romans also had a superb military,
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Technological Attitudes in Han China and Rome
    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Technological Attitudes in Han China and Rome

    Around times ranging from the first century B.C.E all the way to the first century C.E. two large cultures with slightly differing opinions pertaining to technology were those of Han China and Rome. While Rome, a civilization set upon expansion and conquest; saw little need for adaptive technology lest it aided in the plundering lifestyle Rome’s economy was based upon, Han China was much more tolerant towards advancements in technology even as they preferred a more traditional lifestyle. The two main branches of technology presented through the documents include: Technology introduced by governing bodies/officials, and technology innovated by the common consumer.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparison of Rome and Han
    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Comparison of Rome and Han

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were similar technologically. Both had extensive trade and travel networks as well as water technology. The Romans were able to expand and control their empire because of a large network of well maintained roads; originally designed for a quicker deployment of troops the road network also promoted trade because of the relative safety of travel. Similar to the Romans the Han also had an extensive travel network; however, theirs was one based on the water. The Han used rivers as transport which led to the development of a canal network because, as with the Romans, of the safety of travel. Both of these empires also used water technology to move water without manpower. In Rome aqueducts were used to take advantage of gravity and transport water from far away to farms and cities. In the Han waterwheels took advantage of flowing water to create energy which powered chain pumps that moved water to irrigation ditches.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    DBQ 1 Han And Roman View Of Tools
    • 1592 Words
    • 5 Pages

    DBQ 1 Han And Roman View Of Tools

    The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were two of the most powerful civilizations of their era. From a few centuries B.C.E. to a couple centuries after C.E., these empires significantly enhanced their cultures with advancements in technology, but differed in their views of technologies importance and how it was valued. The Han Empire was much more worried about how technology could be advanced to ease the workload of the common man while increasing efficiency, where as the Roman Empire viewed technology as something they were happy to benefit from, but not to be exalted. Even though both civilizations had great technological achievements, they differed greatly in their attitudes toward these achievements and their effects on the laborer, the environment, and manufacturing.…

    • 1592 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Han And Rome: A Comparative Analysis
    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Han And Rome: A Comparative Analysis

    The Han and the Romans both had very passive views when it came to technology, both sharing the "good is good enough" mindset. This appears through people of high class wanting higher quality materials and laborers, the Han enjoying a superb invention but not outwardly seeking to improve it, as well as the Romans appreciated fantastic inventions without searching for ways to improve…

    • 64 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Technological Advancements: The Han And Roman Empire
    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Technological Advancements: The Han And Roman Empire

    To start off, the Han and roman perceived new technology’s in different ways such as approving and disapproving, this is issued in these documents. (doc3) tells about the pestle and the mortar which were invented by the emperor Fuxi. The document states things such as “cleverly improved” or “increasing…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    202 World History Travel Journal
    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    202 World History Travel Journal

    They created an accurate calender with 365 days instead of 360 like the Sumerians. The calendar helped predicted the floods. They also created the Nilometer to measure the floods. The floods helped crops grow, but it had to be just right.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Marvel of Early Roman Technological and Engineering Advances
    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Marvel of Early Roman Technological and Engineering Advances

    Rome is a city in Italy that has always been a source of great innovation and incredible advances in areas of technology and engineering. A city that originated from such humble beginnings soon was able to transform itself into one of the most powerful empires in the world (Dunstan 2010). This transformation can be attributed mainly to Rome’s incredible ability to develop and implement many ideas that allowed the city to flourish (Dunstan 2010). These ideas included but were not limited to drainage systems, mills, and land elevations (Mahdavi 2012). Utilizing these and other advances in technology and engineering allowed Rome to become a more habitable place, and the incredible empire that Ancient Rome was.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Roman and Han Attitudes Towards Technology
    • 779 Words
    • 1 Page

    Roman and Han Attitudes Towards Technology

    proud of their aqueducts. One Roman general raved about the abundance of water they had due…

    • 779 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1020 Ch
    • 427 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1020 Ch

    20. The Romans were the first to use something that made possible cheap large-scale construction. What was it?…

    • 427 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Han And Roman Empires
    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Han And Roman Empires

    One major and most common similarity the Han and Roman empires share is they were both very successful and dominant compared to other societies of their time. One reason these two empires were so dominant is because of their advancement in architecture. During the Han Dynasty much of the Great Wall of China was built. Although the Han Dynasty was much more advanced in architecture than other societies they could not compare to Roman architecture, no one really could. The Romans are known for many things but one of the most commonly talked about subjects when it comes to Rome is architecture. The Romans are given credit for creating cement, which leads to all their other architecture achievements, like the Arch of Titus, The Arch of Constantine, and one of the most famous Roman Buildings the Roman Colosseum. The Roman and Han dynasty were also similar in the matter of what their weapons were made of. The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire both used bronze and iron for things like swords, and shields. These two powerful empires share another thing in common, roads and trades routes. Some of these trade routes were by sea, the Mediterranean and Black Seas were a huge part of Roman trading. The most useful trade route during this time was the Silk Road. Various items were traded on the Silk Road such as silk, weapons, tea, wine, horses, jewelry, and other valuables. Architecture, the use of bronze and iron, and their many…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Han China And Rome Comparison Essay
    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Han China And Rome Comparison Essay

    Ancient Romans were the first to invent and use concrete for buildings and other architectural use. It put them ahead of other empires due to the fact that they could now use concrete to create and make buildings stronger and able to support more weight. Concrete is the reason domes are made possible today. The Romans were the first society to manufacture roads for military purposes. “All roads lead to Rome” is an expression used to show how every road in Europe branches out of Rome. We still use most Roman inventions today. Han China, on the other hand, also greatly benefited the world with the creation of many smaller but still widely used items. The wheelbarrow, for example, may not have had a huge impact on society at the time, but still we use it for many tasks today. The Chinese in the Han Empire also invented paper which is…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Bureaucracy: The Han Dynasty
    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Imperial Bureaucracy: The Han Dynasty

    The Han dynasty mitigated the harshest aspects of Qin governance but kept Qin’s system of imperial bureaucracy. As mentioned above, early Han emperors reduced taxes, provided financial relief for the poor, and relaxed legal penalties; the dynasty had nothing to gain from revoking the ghastly memories of Qin. Qin remained an anathema to Han scholars as well. The scholar-bureaucrat, Jia Yi, despite his praise towards Shihuangdi for unifying China, denounced his dynasty for imposing terror upon people and warned that its fall resulted from its inhumane rule. As an expression of condemnation, moreover, the grand historian, Sima Qian, provided a gruesome account in his magnum opus, Shuji, of an incident wherein Shihuangdi burnt all philosophical texts of certain types under private possession and buried more than 460 scholars who opposed the edict. Han, however, had much in common with its infamous predecessor.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq The Roman Attitude Towards Technology
    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dbq The Roman Attitude Towards Technology

    The Chinese attitude towards technology was that it should be useful to and help the common people. The Roman attitude towards technology was that it was it was of little prestige and didn't relate to the upper classes and was therefore of less importance.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Han Dynasty Dbq
    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Han Dynasty Dbq

    The Han dynasty was proud of the efficiency of their technology and their ability to prevent natural disasters. The Romans marveled at their technological advancements, but didn’t think it was very enlightening when it came to craft.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Technology Dbq
    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Roman Technology Dbq

    Han Guan (document 2) a government official is describing the bad conditions of technology due to the quantity of the workers and the quality of labor. He also says that the lack of using technology causes an increase in the iron and salt prices, causing the lack of seasoning for other countries and the insufficiency of strong tools for farming, building, etc. As Seneca , a Roman philosopher said that "I do not believe that tools for the crafts were invented by wise men. The question of whether the hammer or the tongs came first does not seem important to me. Both were invented by someone with a mind that was nimble and sharp, but not great or elevated" and Cicero (document 5), an upper class roman political said "Vulgar and unbecoming to a gentleman are all the jobs hired workers take on, whose labor is purchased rather than their skill. All craftsmen spend their time in vulgar occupations; no workshop can have anything enlightening about it." This clearly show that these two Roman upper class man were against technology because they believed that inventors and craftsmen have a lack of wisdom and enlightenment. Lastly, Document 6 shows Plutarch, a high government official, writing about how Gaius Gracchus created roads that helped the mobility of horses without requiring a groom to help.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics