The Impact of Corporate Governance on Firm Performance in Mauritius

Topics: Corporate governance, Cadbury Report, Finance Pages: 4 (923 words) Published: May 11, 2010

Corporate governance is a field in economics that investigates how to secure/motivate efficient management of corporations by the use of incentive mechanisms, such as contracts, organizational designs and legislation. This is often limited to the question of improving financial performance, for example, how the corporate owners can secure/motivate that the corporate managers will deliver a competitive rate of return. (Mathiesen, 2002). Another definition is "Corporate Governance is concerned with holding the balance between economic and social goals and between individual and communal goals. The corporate governance framework is there to encourage the efficient use of resources and equally to require accountability for the stewardship of those resources. The aim is to align as nearly as possible the interests of individuals, corporations and society" (Sir Adrian Cadbury in 'Global Corporate Governance Forum', World Bank, 2000). According to La Porta et al.(2000) “corporate governance is to a certain extent a set of mechanisms through which outside investors protect themselves against expropriation by the insiders”. The problem is to see whether the corporate governance standards adopted by firms in Mauritius are positively, negatively or more affecting the firms’ performance. Research will be made on a sample of firms operating in Mauritius.

Literature Review

Related searches in other countries

It has been argued that as ownership concentration increases, the incentives and the abilities of shareholders to properly monitor managers increase too. This creates beneficial effect for firms in the sense that performance or profitability improves (Morck et al. (1989)).

There are studies which find that higher ownership concentration lead to detrimental effects for corporations in the sense that large blockholders and managers can collude to extract rents from small shareholders (Lehman and Weigand (2000)).


References: • Bhagat Sanjai, and Brian Bolton, 2008, Corporate governance and firm performance, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 14, pp. 257-273.
• Chhaochharia Vidhi, and Yaniv Grinstein, 2007, Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of the 2002 governance rules, Journal of Finance, Vol. LXII, No. 4, pp. 1789-1825
• Demsetz, H. and B. Villalonga, 2001, Ownership structure and corporate performance, Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 7, 209-233.
• La Porta, Lopez-de-Silannes, Shleifer, Vishny. Investor perfomance and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics. 58 (2000). 3-27.
• Lehman, E. and J. Weigand, 2000, Does the governed corporation perform better? Governance structures and corporate performance in Germany, European Finance Review,vol. 4, 157-195.
• Mathiesen (2002)
• Morck, R., A. Shleifer and R. Vishny, 1989, Alternative mechanisms of corporate control,American Economic Review, vol. 79, 842-852.
• Patibandla Murali, 2006, Equity pattern, corporate governance and performance: A study of India’s corporate sector, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 59, pp. 29-44.
• Sir Adrian Cadbury in 'Global Corporate Governance Forum ', World Bank, 2000
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Corporate Governance and its Impact on Firm Risk Essay
  • Corporate Governance and Financial Performance Essay
  • Impact of Corporate Governance on Firm Performance: a Case of Insurance Industry of Pakistan Essay
  • Does Corporate Governance Enhance Firm Performance? Essay
  • The Impact of Corporate Governance on Stock Market Performance Essay
  • Essay about Ownership Concentration, Corporate Governance and firm Performance in Textile Sector of Pakistan
  • Corporate Governance Essay
  • Essay about Effective corporate governance

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free