Preview

The Gutenberg Elegies: Is The Message Really The Medium?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1091 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Gutenberg Elegies: Is The Message Really The Medium?
Alyssa James
Jane Frankenfeld
English 101, 2910, A
15 October 2012
Is the Message Really the Medium? In the new millennium, almost everything is digital. Now days, most people have access to the Internet and the billions of bits of information it contains. Books are now electronic and can be read on tablets and smart phones. This raises a few questions: Does this serge in electronics mean that we are no longer thinking critically of the information and merely walking the surface? Or does way we receive this information have and no effect on how a person processes information? This has been a debate for years, and has been weighed in on by countless people. Two of those people are Sven Birkerts and Wen Stephenson. Birkerts believes that
…show more content…
In Birkerts’ essay, “The Owl Has Flown” he begins with talking about the shift from “mechanical to circuit driven” reading in order to set up his main argument. Birkerts says that “how we receive information bears vitally on the way we experience and interpret reality” (33). Birkerts is saying that how people acquire information greatly impacts the way they observe, participate in and make sense of the world around them. The fact that people have changed the way they are getting information and are now using electronics, often more than books, the way they absorb information has changed as well. This leads into Birkerts speaking about “vertical vs. horizontal” thinking. While explaining reading in modern times, Birkerts says, “the inscription is light but it covers vast territories: quantity is elevated over quality” (34). Birkerts seems to think that with so much information available at the click of a button, people are inclined to think deeply about that information, and instead just on to something new. Stephenson would disagree. In his essay “The Message is the Medium”, Stephenson makes a case against Birkerts argument, calling it a “ubiquitous cliché”. To Stephenson, the way that we are getting information does not indicate how well we process it and how deeply we think about …show more content…
To some, the medium in which the information is being presented does have an effect on how well they process said information or how deeply they think about it. There are people that experience information presented in physical form differently than they do when it is presented to them in a digital form. Some need to hold the book in their hands, turn the pages back and forth and write notes in the margins. Although you can go back in the text and make notes on the sides of the pages on electronic devices, it is just not the same. For others, working with digital information is easier. They may be able navigate the text better on an electronic device than with a book or a group of papers. Some may even be able to find comfort and support in online communities (like Stephenson

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Although Agger’s essay is mainly about reading electronic texts he does seem to lean more towards the written word. He believes that paper is the new “Prozac, a balm for distracted minds” (Agger 611). Reading text on paper keeps us more focused because we do not have all of the online information like ads and unnesccary pictures to stimulate our minds. He lists some of the ways how reading electronic texts poses several attention problems. Although Agger likes the written word better, he knows that sometimes there is no way to avoid reading online so he includes a list of ways to increase your focus while reading online texts. He explains how we tend to lose attention…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carr has first hand experience with what the Internet is doing to the minds of those who use it on a daily basis. He used to be able to completely immerse himself into a long book, and spend hours pondering the words and arguments. However, since the “Net is becoming a universal medium, the conduit for most of the information that flows through my eyes and ears and into my mind”(p.90) he finds that he can no longer concentrate and contemplate on longer pieces of…

    • 2227 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Carr states, “My mind now expects to take in information the way the Net distributes it: in a swiftly moving stream of particles” (Carr, 2008). The ability of the human brain to absorb information as quickly as a computer can generate it is highly improbable. This in it of itself proves in fact, that the Internet is making us stupid. The human brain cannot compete with a computer processor. In doing so, the consumer’s brain is only absorbing less amounts of information as it tries to keep up with the speed of the World Wide Web. Carr eloquently identifies with both the young and the old and highlights different aspects of factual information in creative examples to allow the reader to imagine his examples accurately. Carr leads the reader down his intended path, example after example, word by word while stressing that he himself has been a victim of the mental shortcomings. The Internet is a seemingly boundless information highway – unfortunately running at a speed that the human brain cannot contend with. In an attempt to keep up with the ever changing way knowledge is presented to consumers, once reliant upon word of mouth news – which evolved into hand pressed newspaper articles to fire side chats on the radio, the general…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He mentions that by quoting the thoughts of a scientist that says “Wolf worries that the style of reading promoted by the Net, a style that puts “efficiency” and “immediacy” above all else, may be weakening our capacity for deep reading.” (2) Carr mentions the “deep immersion” type of thinking when he use to read and say that since he has started to use the internet he can’t do that anymore, his brain just wants to skim over the reading. He states “Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, and begin looking for something else to do.”(2) Carr blames this on the constant skimming he has done over a long period of time on the internet. Carrs’ article thoroughly explains his views on how people are starting to rely on the internet more and not reading which in turn will affect their ability to read in the long…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We cannot deny that to read in a traditional way is reading in a more concentrated and slower pace which could provide us more space to think deeply, even from our own experience. As what Carr writes in the article that Taylorism has turned the factory workers into little more than automatons (Carr, 593), the Internet is now turning us into a kind of automatons, “information robots”, as well. From day to day as we surf the Internet, we actually read a lot and are able to obtain all sorts of information. Nevertheless, out of their own business interests, the commercial Internet companies try to push us to click as many links as we can and view as many pages as we can during the time we spend on the Internet, instead of encouraging “leisurely reading or slow, concentrated thought” (Carr, 595). As a result, after years, although more and more people are able to enjoy the convenient and affordable Internet connection, those commercial Internet companies have successfully trained more and more people to follow their rules and become their means of making profit unconsciously. Following their rules, we are used to flick through all the materials and gradually lose our ability to read concentratedly. However, as the ones who possess human intelligence, we need…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Way We Read is Changing The Internet can be a great educational tool, providing a world of information at your fingertips very quickly. Getting information, for a research project in the past could take days of reading books and journals. Reading books has become almost obsolete. The attention span of a person reading a book is that of a goldfish, two seconds.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Is Google Making Us Stupid?, Nicholas Carr argues that people are more interested in instant gratification when they take in information than they are in critically thinking about it. He states that people adapt very quickly to new technologies and incorporate aspects of said technologies into their perception of the world, so inventions such as the computer, which are developed for the purpose of fast rapid information transfer, influence the rate at which people evaluate information. It is more common to see people unable to concentrate on activities such as reading today than it was ten years ago. People are more used to scrolling through web pages and skimming articles than assessing the information they come across. Although this method of accessing information allows people to research more efficiently, people are also more likely to acquiesce to whatever mindset…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Internet is making it harder for us to concentrate and become engrossed in the information that we are trying to read. Carr explains how sinking into the depths of an article or getting caught up in the narrative of a book is becoming more and more difficult. “ Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy “ (735) Carr tells us. “ Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He poses that being undistracted while reading allows people to think deeply. The abilty to think deeply has a positive connetation because it allows a person the reasources to come up with their own thoughts and opinions and better understand what they are reading. “In quiet spaces opened up by the prolonged undistracted reading of a book, people made their own associations, drew their own inferences and analogies, fostered their own ideas. They thought deeply as they read deeply” (65). The ablity to thinking deeply is positive because it gives the reader the ablity to form their ideas. “Reading was like working out a puzzle. The brain’s entire cortex, including the foward areas associated with problem solving and descion making, would have been buzzing with neural activity” (61). The human brain is able to uncode and solve puzzles that other species cannot. “As we use what the sociologist Daniel Bell has called our ‘intellecutal technologies’-the tools that extend our mental rather than our physical capacities- we inevitably begin to take on the qualities of those technologies.” I agree with what Carr poses, we do take on the characteristics of technology. As the saying goes our brains are like…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The piece, “Is Google Making us Stupid?”, by Nicholas Carr provides an interesting view from a writer's perspective of his change in processing information due to the growing digital world. He reflects on how the internet has made his life easier but also caused his attention span to shorten. He believes that while the internet is very helpful, it is changing the way people think. Carr relates his struggles to those of many of his intellectual colleagues and how it has changed their lives as fellow consumers of text. He explores the changes within the mind and the way that, in turn, it has changed a person's response to reading. To further his explanations, he uses in depth descriptions of various technologies and their…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The internet has become the number one source for information. It is quick and easy. Some argue that it is a distraction, while others argue that it is the best thing since slice bread. In the article “Is Google Making us Stupid?” by Carr he used a form of ethos and factual evidence to help get his point across to his readers. He argues how technology is hindering people and causing them to become lazy, therefore causing harm towards today’s society. Throughout the article “Mind Over Mass Media” Steven Pinker, also uses a form of ethos and factual evidence to help voice his opinion on how technology is serving more of a benefit. Some believe that people are becoming more intelligent because of the use of…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Digital Nation Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the Frontline video titled Digital Nation, Rachel Dretzin and Douglas Rushkoff explored the impact of digital media on today’s society. In the video they cover everything from it’s impact on the brain, to it’s impact on students, to it’s impact on the military. Nothing is spared in this investigation on the effect of digital media, and growing up in a wired world. However the main thing I managed to take away from this film was it has had a dramatic effect on human abilities and communication, which I will be discussing in the following paragraphs.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 1

    • 8984 Words
    • 36 Pages

    A. Technology is an integral part of our personal, as well as our professional, lives…

    • 8984 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dumbest Generation

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Modern technology has its merits. As Bauerlein points out in his article “the Dumbest Generation”, the digital revolution has provided us with “miraculous quick and effortless contact with information.” Indeed, we are the generation surrounded by technology, and the immediate access to countless of information has definitely aided us in many aspects of the modern society. Researching information has become…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Synthesis on Smart Phones

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Before people had access to the internet so commonly finding answers for things was more difficult. When people needed an answer to something they would have to go to the library or look it up in a textbook. Now they simply have to google the question on a computer or phone giving them an easy one line answer in less than a minute. This seems like a good thing, but it has changed how people learn and take in information. For example, if a student needs to answer a question at school, he needs to use a textbook to dig for the answer hidden in a huge wall of text. This is hard because they are accustomed to one line answers provided from the internet. The article “Lazy Eyes” explains that the internet’s various distractions make people skim or skip reading big blocks of text. Doing this on the internet has carried over to the way we read everything. It makes reading long sections of a book for a single answer much more difficult because we are unintentionally skipping or skimming long paragraphs. This is not the first time our ability to learn has changed. According to Sherry Turkle, in the late 1970’s “Professors in engineering complained that the transition from slide rules to calculators had affected their students’ ability to deal with issues of scale.” The internet is making it harder to learn in some cases, but just like the professors being able to teach scale while using calculators, they will be able to teach while using the internet. In the end,…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics