Peacocke expresses how “McFarland makes an important point: that no amount of television censorship will ever change the harsh nature of reality and to censor reality is mere folly.” (pg). She focuses on the ethos to acknowledge the pride of American society; therefore she explains how people tend to feel insulted when confronted directly. Zinger agrees with peacocke along the same lines how both shows go beyond to explain the American society. Pecocke explains that every show has some educational purposes, and these animate cartoons show “some aspects of American culture” (pg 303). Haven’t finished need more to add similarities between zinger and …show more content…
He explains The Daily Show informs people in unusual type of way that can be seen as entertaining and educational. According to the article, it argues that many people conclude the show misleads their viewers to think that is a show with no accurate information because of its comedy. Zinger believes that the show is not corrupt “If uses real news, items , and real stories, whether people tune into to be entertained, to be informed or both … The daily Show shapes people’s perspective on the world” (pg 366). Many shows inform their viewers in a way that can be unusual, thus making the decision whether the source is reliable or not depends on the person. Zinger explains that “if viewers are tuning into a comedy show to get the latest news I believe that the viewers can distinguish between pure entertainment and the real news” (Pg 367). He opinioned people feel that shows like The Daily Show are misleading the public into having negative thoughts about the current issues because not a lot of information is explained.; therefore people think this shows only care about ratings. Zinger explains that having these ratings and knowing people tune in more gives the network more reason to give accurate information