Preview

The Good, Bad and Ugly of Fracking

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2004 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Good, Bad and Ugly of Fracking
The Good, Bad and Ugly of Fracking There is a gold rush going on right now. Man is breaking the earth, looking for natural gas. It’s a mad scene, with hucksters on every side of the issue. There is a lot going on underground and that process is called Fracking. The word alone can stir up controversy. The process of extracting natural gas through hydraulic fracturing or “fracking,” might summon in someone’s imagination an environment and damaged communities. Natural gas hides from sight it is invisible. Perhaps envisioned a prettier picture—one that involves clean-burning fuel, job growth and affordable energy. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) states that fracking “is the process of injecting large volumes of water, sand and chemicals into the ground at high pressure to break up shale formation allowing more efficient recovery of oil and gas” (Walter). This practice has grown rapidly over the course of the last decade thanks to improved technologies, but it also has fostered debates concerning its environmental, health and safety impact along the way. The process of hydraulic fracturing – shooting water, sand, and chemicals at high pressure into underground wells to release natural gas – is a divisive issue. Some say it dumps chemicals into ground water supplies; others argue it causes earthquakes, and still others think it can revolutionize America’s energy industry. Environmentalists argue that fracking contaminates ground and surface water – a charge the gas companies deny. Here’s the problem: the fracking process begins with a well drilled deep underground. Horizontal passages are then drilled outward from the bottom of the well. Water, sand and chemicals are pumped at high pressure through the water is insignificant, and it has never been proven that those chemicals rise ground water supplies. On the other hand, environmentalists say the downward drilling process, if done poorly, releases chemicals into both ground and


Cited: "Fracking And Drinking Water Safety: Developing Natural Gas Through Hydraulic Fracturing." Congressional Digest 91.3 (2012): 65. Academic Search Premier. Web. 10 Apr. 2013. Howarth, Robert W.Ingraffea, AnthonyEngelder, Terry. "Natural Gas: Should Fracking Stop?." Nature 477.7364 (2011): 271. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 18 Apr. 2013. Humes, Edward. "Factured Lives." sierra 97.4 (2012): 52. Masterfile premier. Web. 18 apr. 2013. McGraw, Seamus. "Is Fracking Safe? The Top 10 controversial claims About Natural Gas Drilling." Popular Mechanics. N.p., June 2012. Web. 14 Apr. 2013. Walter, Laura. "What The Frack?." EHS Today 6.1 (2013): 31. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 10 Apr. 2013. Zuckerman, Mortimer B. "Natural Gas Can Remake Our Energy Future." U.S. News Digital Weekly 25 Nov. 2011: 22. Academic Search Premier. Web. 10 Apr. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fracking occurs when “water wells become plugged up with sand and other minerals. A machine is brought in to inject water into the well at extreme pressure to blow out the tiny cracks and fissures in the rock through which the water flow.” (Fracking Threatens Everyone) Completely harmless. Or so it seemed at that time. Today dealing with increased pollution, it contaminated this ‘wonderful’ thing. “Fracking injects large quantities of water under great pressure with sand and many toxic chemicals mixed in. Many of these are can cause cancer…Unfortunately, when fracking goes wrong, sources of drinking water ca be ruined and all different types of pollution can happen in a second.” (Fracking Threatens Everyone) Just like that, in a blink of an eye, something wonderful was turned around and causes more problems than we can…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Too Frack or Not to Frack

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the process in which the fracking solution is forced into the ground at high pressures, occasionally toxic fluids can leak out from the system and contaminate nearby drinking water. Environmental studies have concluded that methane concentrations are seventeen times higher in drinking water wells near fracturing sites. There are at least 1,000 documented cases of water contamination next to fracking areas as well as cases of sensory, respiratory, and neurological damage due to ingested contaminated water. Up to six hundred chemicals are used in the fluid solution they send into the ground, including carcinogens and toxins such as uranium, methanol, mercury, hydrolic acid, ethylene, glycol, and formaldehyde. When they bring the fracturing fluid back up after fracturing the shale rocks, to release the natural gas, only thirty to fifty percent of it is recovered. The waste solution recovered is then left in open air pits to evaporate, releasing harmful VOC’s (volatile…

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis: There is major debate both for and against using the fracking method to extract natural gas from the ground, but I propose that the federal government establish, monitor, and regulate environmental and health risks, and then create a minimum standard which the states are required to follow. Background: In the 1940’s the Halliburton Corporation developed a process to revitalize well production and prolong the life of wells nearing the end of their production cycle. The fracturing process, called “fracking”, pumps a mixture of water and sand, along with some chemical additives, at high pressures to create additional fractures in the sedimentary rock.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hydraulic Fracturing or fracking was first introduced in 1940s and has then been a key provider of natural gas and oil worldwide. Despite its expansion and customary use, fracking still poses many health and environmental concerns. During fracking, pressurized liquids are injected into drilled wells, which cause the surrounding rock to crack open allowing gas and oil flow through the fissures. Millions of gallons of water are used and a similarly large volume of waste water is generated. Most of the water is never restored and the stored waste water and fracking fluid can adversely affect the animals and vegetation around it. Along with the water, other chemicals are injected into the ground as far as 10,000 feet below the surface and enter groundwater, polluting drinking sources for many. Fracking may be a key provider of oil but this expensive, polluting, low energy-return process is not worth the loss of wildlife habitat, natural land and innumerable water resources.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fracking Pros And Cons

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Hydraulic fracturing, also termed hydrofracturing, hydrofracking, or simply fracking, is hotly debated for its economic and environmental impacts. Fracking is the process by which rock is fractured by a pressurized fluid containing water. chemicals and sand to access natural gas, petroleum and brine from great depths of the Earth’s surface. Fracking produces the economic benefit of more accessible hydrocarbons, not to mention the 2.5 million fracking related jobs that were recorded in 2012 worldwide, one million of which were in the United States alone (FracFocus: ECHO-EPA Violations). However, many fear the environmental effects. Risks include ground and surface water contamination, air and noise pollution, and an increase in seismic activity. Hazards to public health and the environment are yet to be discovered, because the first commercial application did not begin until the late 1940’s; however, hydraulic fractures have been recorded naturally throughout time (The Truth about…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The modern environmental justice movement began in the mid- 20th century, when the country realized that the environment needed help. This movement throughout the last several decades has evolved from protecting woodland areas from deforestation to protection against the gas industry. Hydraulic fracturing is the process by which natural gas is extracted from the earth’s shales. The process begins with drilling through several layers of the earth, like the freshwater aquifer. Next, water with “fracking fluid” is injected into the drilled area to crack the shale. This water comes back up to the surface and is put into a pit to evaporate. The natural gas flows up, and is then stored. The process is simple enough, but so are the consequences. Hydraulic fracturing has detrimental environmental consequences and should be banned.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It's a Fracking Problem

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Fracking is increasing in the U.S., but with this increase of natural gas comes an increase of safety concerns. The process of hydraulic fracking requires chemicals that can affect the families that live nearby. These chemicals also affect the environment on the land and in the air. With fracking there comes its positives and its negatives, some good and some bad. There are very few regulations on how fracking can be done, but in the regulations there isn't much help. Fracking for natural gas needs to be further regulated before it can continue.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ZOOM As time has evolved we have seen the consumption of energy rise, thus also raising the need for more fossil fuels. One popular method as of the 1940’s would be hydraulic fracturing, otherwise known as fracking. Fracking has been proven to be a lucrative business nearly accounting for more than half of the oil extraction in the US as stated by Source C. While fracking is a useful method of retrieving fossil fuels it can also prove to be detrimental to our everyday lives. The world isn’t blind to the dangers of fracking as many countries in Europe have already taken steps to ban fracking which is stated in Source A.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A principle concern in the fracking debate lies over the content of the “fracking fluid.” This fluid is used to increase pressure in shale formations and cause fractures that increase permeability and allow greater access and capture of liquid natural gas or other hydrocarbon products that would be otherwise inaccessible or require numerous more wells be drilled (He, Li, Liu, Barbot, Vidic, 2014). This fluid consists of water and chemical additives such as, “ friction reducers to optimize flow characteristics, biocides to inhibit biological growth, proppant material, such as well-sorted sand, to hold the fractures open, corrosion inhibitors to protect well casing, scale inhibitors to preserve the permeability of the proppant pack, and surfactants to aid in fluid recovery (He, 2014).” Also of concern is the content of “flowback,” or the fluid that reemerges from the well and is collected from the site once the well is no longer active, that may contain worrisome chemicals such as radionuclides, heavy metals/salts, and toxic organic compounds (Strong et al., 2013).…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unfortunately, animals are dying because of Hydrofracking accidents. Researchers discovered that there is a range of health risks that are related to fracking and the other parts of the process, such as the chemicals that are injected deep underground and the toxic compounds that rise to the surface.The construction of roads, drilling pads and pipelines for thousands of drilling operations are adding up and impacting rural communities and affecting America’s landscape. The clearing of thousands of acres of forests is leading to reduced and fragmented habitats and other potentially life-threatening impacts for wildlife. Animals are starving , on the edge of life or death. Anorexic animals are everywhere near gaslands.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A controversial new method of extracting natural gas from the earth has become a danger for Americans. This method is called Hydraulic Fracturing, or Fracking. This drilling has made it possible to retrieve methane gas trapped in the shale rock that lays thousands of feet below the ground. For some, fracking can be seen as a good thing for our country. Fracking is boosting the nation’s economy, creating jobs and energy export opportunities, and strengthening the energy independence of the United States. Although it may help in some aspects, it comes at a very high cost to the American people. Fracking is extremely harmful to the water supply, the environment, and the population.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros Of Fracking

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fracking has been a big deal lately. Fracking is a technique to get oil and gas out of the ground but it means they have to put a pipe in the ground then send water,sand and many other chemicals through the pipe at high-pressure. From all the pressure it makes cracks in the ground bringing up gas and oil. Even if there’s many benefits from fracking there's many disadvantages to. My claim on this problem is that we should stop the process of fracking.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What Is Fracking?

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page

    Fracking is a natural way of extracting natural gas from underground reservoirs. Fracking is now being used by many companies and is also a way of extracting natural gas from hot dry rocks. The process of hydraulic fracking consists of 6 main steps in which, you try to get the natural gas that is trapped inside the rock. The natural gas is released when the rock breaks, it then travels through the fractures and out of the well. The natural gas is then used in many useful ways such as to heat houses, light up a stove or move a car. Although this seems good scientist believe that fracking may have a negative impact on the world. Some research and studies show that fracking may cause earthquakes or pollute ground water but, not all scientist…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    EPA is a government agency that does research on the impact of fracking on water quality specifically on drinking water. They consider in their report every activity related to water cycle of hydraulic fracturing that may have potential impact on drinking water such as water acquisition, chemical mixing, well injection, produced water handling and wastewater disposal. Based on their research, EPA identified conditions where fracking can be more severe, including: water withdrawal at limited groundwater resources, mishandling of fracking fluid, chemicals and produced water by the industries, and improperly discharge or dispose of wastewater. This report is considered the most complete compilation of data on the relationship between fracking…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The subject that I found most interesting during the course was our discussion on Fracking. Is it ultimately beneficial to the society we live in or has it destroyed our natural environment. These are the questions that need to be answered. I will try to determine some of the aspects that might make it potentially dangerous and yet potentially highly economical and beneficial to North Americas vast resource system. What is fracking? Well; it gets its name from “Hydraulic Fracturing,” and this is the process by which fossil fuels, usually natural gas or petroleum, are extracted from the earth. During this process, drilling from a well into hard shale rock takes place, and then that rock is cracked. This cracking releases the fossil fuels inside the shale rocks. Water, sand and chemicals are injected into the cracked rocks at high pressure. Ultimately the injection forces the gas or oil to flow out of the well(CNN 2012). The whole process of just developing a well typically takes between 3-5 months but this investment could eventually produce natural gas or oil for the 20-40 years(Marathon Oil 2012) . Close to 87% of worldwide fracking is done in North America although the government does restrict were fracking can be done (CNN 2012). As with so many things in life, there are arguments for and against the growth of the industry in North America. On one side are those who believe that fracking produces numerous benefits which more than outweigh any potential drawbacks. Aubrey McClendon of Chesapeake Energy states “Natural Gas is such a huge game changer and that by using natural gas America can establish independence from OPEC, it could get Americans back to work by creating jobs, it can lower our carbon emissions and it can improve the economy by not exporting over a billion dollar of oil a day to overseas countries”(60 Minutes…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays