Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The German-Great Britain Trade Rivalry in Comparison to the Us-Japan R

Satisfactory Essays
1019 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The German-Great Britain Trade Rivalry in Comparison to the Us-Japan R
The German-Great Britain trade rivalry like theU.S.-Japan trade rivalry involved a rising power cutting into the trade of an already dominant trading power. There wereseveral causes of the German-Great Britain trade rivalryaccording to Hoffman. The first was German's industry's zealin procuring new contracts and expanding markets. They didthis by fulfilling contracts even if they were very small andconstantly trying to stay up with market demand. Second,Germans had a knowledge of languages that the English firmslacked. Third, German industry was aided by their government.In contrast Great Britain did not even supply consularassistance in helping develop markets in British colonies.Fourth, British trade was hurt by the conservatism of Britishmanufacturers who were unwilling to develop new markets orhold onto those it already possessed. These four factors arejust some of the factors that helped German industry grow andrival that of Great Britain. <br><br>These four factors are all very similar to theJapan-U.S. trade rivalry. Japan like Germany was able tocatch up to the U.S. because the U.S. was large and arrogantand refused to believe it could face competition from Japan.Like Britain, U.S. industry believed that they could holdonto markets and would not face competition. British and U.S.industry were startled by the fast rate of growth andindustrialization that allowed Germany and Japan to transformthemselves quickly into trading rivals. This fast rate ofgrowth also caused friction between both sets of countries.Relations between Germany and Great Britain were damaged asthey bickered over markets in particular colonies in Africa .This is similar to the friction between the U.S. and Japanunfair trading practices and closed markets.<br><br>Both the U.S. and Great Britain in response to losingmarkets toyed with the idea of economic nationalism andtariffs. As Britain lost markets to Germany many in Britainfelt that Britain should adopt tariffs on goods while othersknown as the free traders believed that a free tradewould benefit Britain by creating markets. This split betweenTariff Reformers and Free Traders is similar to the split in the U.S. between those in favor of free tradeand those opposed to it. Germany's grab for new markets inthe 1890's through commercial treaties such as the 1891treaty with Austria-Hungry is similar to both the UnitedStates and Japan's free trade zones with neighboringcountries using treaties such as ASEAN and NAFTA. <br><br>The German-Great Britain trade rivalry is different thenthe U.S.-Japan trade rivalry because a large sector ofJapan's market for selling goods is the United States who itis competing against; this was not true of Germany. BothBritain and Germany were competing for markets outside ofboth their countries. Also the trade rivalry between Japanand the United States did not involve a fight over colonies.Trade rivalries between rising and dominant powers changelittle over time. The German-British trade rivalry and theJapan U.S. rivalry were very similar in their causes,effects, and the solutions that both sets of governments usedto overcome their trading rival.The German-Great BritainTrade Rivalry in Comparison to the U.S.- Japan Trade Rivalry?<br><br>The German-Great Britain trade rivalry like theU.S.-Japan trade rivalry involved a rising power cutting into the trade of an already dominant trading power. There wereseveral causes of the German-Great Britain trade rivalryaccording to Hoffman. The first was German's industry's zealin procuring new contracts and expanding markets. They didthis by fulfilling contracts even if they were very small andconstantly trying to stay up with market demand. Second,Germans had a knowledge of languages that the English firmslacked. Third, German industry was aided by their government.In contrast Great Britain did not even supply consularassistance in helping develop markets in British colonies.Fourth, British trade was hurt by the conservatism of Britishmanufacturers who were unwilling to develop new markets orhold onto those it already possessed. These four factors arejust some of the factors that helped German industry grow andrival that of Great Britain. <br><br>These four factors are all very similar to theJapan-U.S. trade rivalry. Japan like Germany was able tocatch up to the U.S. because the U.S. was large and arrogantand refused to believe it could face competition from Japan.Like Britain, U.S. industry believed that they could holdonto markets and would not face competition. British and U.S.industry were startled by the fast rate of growth andindustrialization that allowed Germany and Japan to transformthemselves quickly into trading rivals. This fast rate ofgrowth also caused friction between both sets of countries.Relations between Germany and Great Britain were damaged asthey bickered over markets in particular colonies in Africa .This is similar to the friction between the U.S. and Japanunfair trading practices and closed markets.<br><br>Both the U.S. and Great Britain in response to losingmarkets toyed with the idea of economic nationalism andtariffs. As Britain lost markets to Germany many in Britainfelt that Britain should adopt tariffs on goods while othersknown as the free traders believed that a free tradewould benefit Britain by creating markets. This split betweenTariff Reformers and Free Traders is similar to the split in the U.S. between those in favor of free tradeand those opposed to it. Germany's grab for new markets inthe 1890's through commercial treaties such as the 1891treaty with Austria-Hungry is similar to both the UnitedStates and Japan's free trade zones with neighboringcountries using treaties such as ASEAN and NAFTA. <br><br>The German-Great Britain trade rivalry is different thenthe U.S.-Japan trade rivalry because a large sector ofJapan's market for selling goods is the United States who itis competing against; this was not true of Germany. BothBritain and Germany were competing for markets outside ofboth their countries. Also the trade rivalry between Japanand the United States did not involve a fight over colonies.Trade rivalries between rising and dominant powers changelittle over time. The German-British trade rivalry and theJapan U.S. rivalry were very similar in their causes,effects, and the solutions that both sets of governments usedto overcome their trading rival.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    By 1900 the British Empire extended over five continents and France had control of large areas of Africa. With the rise of industrialism countries needed new markets. The amount of lands 'owned' by Britain and France increased the rivalry with Germany who had entered the scramble to acquire colonies late and only had…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Doc 2(according to this graph) – The US exports to France and Britain rose dramatically after 1915, however exports to Germany dramatically sunk. This shows the influence and connections between France and Britain, and how their relations drew the US into the war…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    France and Germany didn’t see much substance in trade. This is another difference between them and the English.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1800s Dbq Analysis

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The 1800s were a time full of growth and modernization. The geography of countries plays a big roll in their economy and the resources they can provide for themselves. The fact that Great Britain and Japan are both island nations has lead them to develop around their location and limitations.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    17th Century Dbq

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First, one of the causes of the shifts in economic balance of power was the foundation of new economic systems, namely mercantilism. To start, absolute monarchs controlled the economy during the 17th C. For example, James I granted a charter to the Virginia Company to build a colony in the Americas (Doc. 1). This exemplifies the implementation of mercantilism. Jean-Baptiste Colbert’s Mercantilism called for the increase in exclusive trade with the mother country. The mother country in this case would be England with Virginia as its colony. Products such as raw materials or finished goods produced in the colonies would go to England with high tariffs on them, but were not allowed to go to the Dutch Republic or any other enemies. The French also generally adhered to mercantilist theory in establishing their colonies, using them mainly for the economic advantage of France. The practice of expansion and colonization led to the shift from the Dutch Republic to England and France as the major economic powers.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Chapter 30 Outline

    • 3726 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Also, since the U.S. did not continue advancing, Americans were caught by the Japanese and the Germans in industries that the U.S. had once dominated: steel, automobiles, consumer electronics.…

    • 3726 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The menace of the hostile division led to an arms race, another cause of World War One. Germany was the leader in a military organization and efficiency, the great powers of Europe copied the universal conscription and detailed planning of the Prussian System. The armies of France and Germany doubled in size between 1870 and 1914. Naval expansion was also competitive, particularly between Germany and Great Britain. British had established the principle that maintained naval superiority in the event of the…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trade with both sides was allowed and merchant ships crossed the Atlantic to trade. However, a British naval blockade of German coastline made it unfeasible for America to trade with Germany- through no fault of her own. The British policy of blockading Germany was the main reason on why Germany eventually introduced unlimited submarine warfare. Germany would have declared the Britain which would had forced her into taking this kind of…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Germans agreed to not use unrestricted submarine warfare, and remained peaceful with the US, Germany tried to make allies with those who had bad relations ((())) with America, such as Mexico by sending the Zimmermann Telegram to Mexico on January 16, 1917. Although this didn’t cause a disturbance in the opinions of the citizens, it was starting to cause tension. . This shows how it was a good thing to join((()) the war because after the numerous amounts of warnings, Germany thought too lightly of America. Additionally, during World War 1, Britain was taking loans from America due to the amount they had to pay for the army. If America didn’t help out, Britain would have been taken over by the Germans and the debt would have been gone like it never existed, or,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apush Ch 9

    • 1650 Words
    • 5 Pages

    American textile manufactures were at an advantage compared to British manufactures, and they were very successful. America persuaded Britain to prohibit the export of textile machinery and the emigration of mechanics. Yet, still many British mechanics migrated over to the United States because they were lured by the higher wages. In competing the British mills, America had the advantage of an abundance of natural resources. America’s farmers were able to produce large amounts of cotton and wool, and they had fast flowing rivers that provided good transportation. But the British undersold their American competitors, having cheap transportation and low wages they were able to import raw cotton from America, manufacturing it into clothing, and re selling it in America. The U.S. government assisted this problem by placing a tariff on imported cotton and wool cloth. Overall the U.S. started to have more effective systems then European nations and became richer and subsequently a global power.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Attack on Pearl Harbor

    • 4911 Words
    • 20 Pages

    In the late 1930’s, the United States was pulling itself out of the Great Depression and living with the devastating drought of the Dust Bowl. President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal programs had offered financial relief and aid for many United States citizens; by 1941 the country was on a slow path to recovery. (Hamen, 2009) War had been raging in Europe since September 1939; World War II set Germany and Italy against France and Great Britain. In June 1940, France had fallen to Adolf Hitler’s German troops. Soon after Great Britain was the only country in Europe that was able to fend off German invasion; Germany had already taken over Poland, Denmark, and Norway. Great Britain’s Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, looked for help from the United States. President Roosevelt sent aid to Great Britain in war materials through the Lend­Lease act, but the United States was not eager to become involved with a war that leaders believed did not concern them. However, that would all change (December 7, 1941). (Hamen, 2009) Japan struggled economically after World War I. With very few natural resources, Japan had to rely on other countries for imports of items like iron, oil, natural gas, and rubber. The neighboring Asian countries had these resources in abundance;…

    • 4911 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism Dbq Essay

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Money lead to power for the new imperialist. If you had the funds and land you were practically unstoppable. For example when the British ventured out to Africa with their alliances they were able to conquer ports and because they had money they were able to use those resources like iron and coal so they can adjustments for boats. However, one of the most controversial measures involved the issues of free trade, or trade between countries without quotas,tariffs, or other…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The US has taken dominance over the Canadian Free Trade agreement since the beginning of the confederation. The rivalry between the US and the UK is viewed to have remained the same since after World War II. Rivalry between the two nations was attributed by an increase in trade with the US. Imports between the 2 countries were measureable. However, imports from the UK were more than those of the US. The World War led to a major impact on the economic policies and trade of nations. Markets were devastated to a point where 70% of the imports from Canada came from the…

    • 2389 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This also leads to the invention of submarines by the Germans during World War I. Imperialism was also one of many causes of World War I. Imperial competition causes alliances between countries to form. The two main alliances which fought in the war were the Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance also known as the Central Powers. Before the start of World War I, countries’ military has been getting stronger. This is what fueled alliances to form due to the paranoia created by neighboring countries strengthening. The Germans have especially gotten stronger due to their massive military and their technological and weaponry advantages.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism In World War 1

    • 1093 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Within Europe, imperialism occurred at the height of industrialization. As European countries were discovering more about the sciences and mass production benefits via industrialization, a demand and competition for more land and produce was developing, and this would create the tension needed to begin the First World War. Germany and Great Britain were two powerful European countries that had been trying to establish control in Africa and Asia, two countries that were not as strong as them, and relatively vulnerable. Due to rebellions of the native people and interferences by each other and other countries, they were not entirely successful. This lack of cooperation between European countries in the attempt to govern and control weaker states so as to use their products for trade caused tension, and finally after it built up to a certain point, war was the only option left.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays