Preview

The Gambler's Fallacy, the Fallacy of the Maturity of Chances

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3171 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Gambler's Fallacy, the Fallacy of the Maturity of Chances
Gambler's fallacy

1

Gambler's fallacy
The Gambler's fallacy, also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy (because its most famous example happened in a Monte Carlo Casino in 1913)[1] . Also referred to as the fallacy of the maturity of chances, which is the belief that if deviations from expected behaviour are observed in repeated independent trials of some random process, future deviations in the opposite direction are then more likely. For example, if a fair coin is tossed repeatedly and tails comes up a larger number of times than is expected, a gambler may incorrectly believe that this means that heads is more likely in future tosses.[2] . Such an expectation could be mistakenly referred to as being due, and it probably arises from everyday experiences with nonrandom events (such as when a scheduled train is late, where it can be expected that it has a greater chance of arriving the later it gets). This is an informal fallacy. It is also known colloquially as the law of averages. What is true instead are the law of large numbers – in the long term, averages of independent trials will tend to approach the expected value, even though individual trials are independent – and regression toward the mean, namely that following a rare extreme event (say, a run of 10 heads), the next event is likely to be less extreme (the next run of heads is likely to be less than 10), simply because extreme events are rare. The gambler's fallacy implicitly involves an assertion of negative correlation between trials of the random process and therefore involves a denial of the exchangeability of outcomes of the random process. In other words, one implicitly assigns a higher chance of occurrence to an event even though from the point of view of "nature" or the "experiment", all such events are equally probable (or distributed in a known way). The reversal is also a fallacy, in which a gambler may instead decide that tails are more likely out of some mystical preconception that fate



References: [1] Lehrer, Jonah (2009). How We Decide. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 66. ISBN 978-0-618-62011-1. [2] Colman, Andrew (2001). "Gambler 's Fallacy - Encyclopedia.com" (http:/ / www. encyclopedia. com/ doc/ 1O87-gamblersfallacy. html). A Dictionary of Psychology. Oxford University Press. . Retrieved 2007-11-26. [3] O 'Neill, B. and Puza, B.D. (2004) Dice have no memories but I do: A defence of the reverse gambler 's belief. (http:/ / cbe. anu. edu. au/ research/ papers/ pdf/ STAT0004WP. pdf). Reprinted in abridged form as O 'Neill, B. and Puza, B.D. (2005) In defence of the reverse gambler 's belief. The Mathematical Scientist 30(1), pp. 13–16. [4] Tversky, Amos; Daniel Kahneman (1974). "Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases". Science 185 (4157): 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124. PMID 17835457. [5] Tversky, Amos; Daniel Kahneman (1971). "Belief in the law of small numbers". Psychological Bulletin 76 (2): 105–110. doi:10.1037/h0031322. [6] Tversky & Kahneman, 1974. [7] Tune, G.S. (1964). "Response preferences: A review of some relevant literature". Psychological Bulletin 61 (4): 286–302. doi:10.1037/h0048618. PMID 14140335. [8] Tversky & Kahneman, 1971. [9] Gilovich, Thomas (1991). How we know what isn 't so. New York: The Free Press. pp. 16–19. ISBN 0-02-911706-2. Article Sources and Contributors 6 Article Sources and Contributors Gambler 's fallacy  Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=455892717  Contributors: 2004-12-29T22:45Z, 2005, AKGhetto, Aaron Kauppi, Alex W, Alksub, Aly89, Andeggs, Andyroo316, Aoxiang, Areldyb, Ashley Pomeroy, Aveekbh, Avirunes, AxelBoldt, Baccyak4H, Badger Drink, Barklund, Bender235, Bfinn, Bigturtle, Bkell, Blue Tie, Bryan Derksen, Bush6984, CSTAR, Calair, Camaj, Camw, Cgwaldman, Cjrcl, Cmglee, CobaltBlue, Constructive editor, Conversion script, Courcelles, Cyclist, D o m e, DanielCD, DavidDouthitt, DavidWBrooks, Day viewing, Dcoetzee, Den fjättrade ankan, Deor, DocWatson42, Doniago, Donnaidh sidhe, DragonHawk, E090, Edward, Electricbassguy, Emurphy42, Enric Naval, Eurosong, Evanreyes, Father Goose, FeatherPluma, Feezo, Fosterd2, Fr, Furrykef, GDstew4, GVnayR, Gayasri, Gazpacho, Giftlite, Gonzalo Diethelm, Grace Note, Graham87, GreenReaper, Gregbard, Grumpyyoungman01, HAGADAG, Headcase88, Heron, Horovits, Hyphz, Iceberg3k, Jaguar9a9, Jasperdoomen, Jimjam27, Jnestorius, Jokes Free4Me, Julesd, Karada, Kazvorpal, Labans, Lenoxus, Lifefeed, Liko81, LilHelpa, LukeH, Luqui, Magog the Ogre, Malcolm Farmer, MathHisSci, McGeddon, Melchoir, Melcombe, Meno25, Michaelbluejay, Mike Van Emmerik, Molinari, Musiphil, Navigatr85, Nbarth, Netsumdisc, Notoldyet, NykeYoung, O 'kelly, Orthologist, Ozkaplan, PAR, Pacomartin, Pakaran, PanagosTheOther, Pat Hayes, PatrikR, Pigman, Pimnl, Pratik.mallya, Quarl, Quiddity, Qwfp, Rbarreira, Reki, Roma emu, Ruzbehabbasi, S2000magician, SCF71, Sandebert, Sbyrnes321, Shantavira, Sietse Snel, Silence, Slicing, SmartGuy, Smjg, Snoyes, Sockatume, Spoon!, Statoman71, StuRat, Superm401, Taak, Takwish, Tamfang, Tarquin, The Anome, TheFix63, TheOtherStephan, Thumperward, Timo Honkasalo, Tomeasy, Tomisti, Torbad, UltimateHombre, Uvaphdman, Vbailo, Vicki Rosenzweig, Vonbontee, Waleswatcher, Wolfkeeper, Woodstone, Wotnow, Wrp103, 178 anonymous edits Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors File:Lawoflargenumbersanimation.gif  Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Lawoflargenumbersanimation.gif  License: Public Domain  Contributors: Sbyrnes321 License Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported //creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    the certainty of a certain amount is compared with the willingness to gamble that amount on a larger amount.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    There were two groups; one with students who reports the gambling on regular and other group consisting of students who never gamble. Same experimental choices were implied to this experiment but with playing of video games for winning points (10, 0, 30 etc). They found that self-detailed gamblers chose the low-probability, high payoff alternative significantly more regularly (56.5%) than control subjects (23.0%). These results suggest that the suboptimal-decision task designed for use with pigeons might be also be suitable for studying the mechanisms that add to human gambling choices. So the results of this experiment were quite similar to the experiment performed with pigeons. Based on the results, the author should study the gambling like behavior in humans by considering the important factors such as gender type, age, race etc. This will help to understand the gambling-like behavior in more details and in all possible aspects because gender, age and race matters a lot towards the development of gambling-like behavior. All in all, the base of gambling-like behavior is based on impulsivity which may work as a proximal mechanism that increases suboptimal decision in pathological gamblers. Moreover the attentional bias to gambling-related targets generates positive result anticipation, consequently spurring instrumental gambling behavior.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    That controversy has been created by two short stories, ‘The Lottery’ and ‘Examination Day’. In both short stories, the end result is not what most readers would expect, and can easily throw off unsuspecting readers. For instance, in ‘The Lottery’, the name of the story already signals to a reader that this story is probably about a raffle with a winner. Additionally, the first sentence states, “The morning of June 27th was clear and sunny, with the fresh warmth of a full-summer day; the flowers were blossoming profusely and the grass was richly green.” The story illustrates a joyful setting, and that the winner of the lottery will get some prize. “And soft laughter ran through the crowd as the people stirred back into position after Mrs. Hutchinson's arrival.” The story further illustrates this joyful setting as the townsfolk seem very happy to be there. However, the story flips this attitude on its head when the true meaning of the lottery is revealed. The author foreshadows that the lottery isn’t what you may expect, as when the black box containing the slips of paper used to conduct the lottery, “The villagers kept their distance, leaving a space between themselves and the stool.” The townspeople are scared of anything that has to do with the lottery. In the end, the prize for winning the lottery was disclosed when the villagers stoned the winner of the lottery. “A stone hit her…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Behavorial Traps

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Plous, S. (1993). The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Framing Effects

    • 9267 Words
    • 38 Pages

    able models of human decision making. The author examines the mechanisms and dynamics of framing effects in risky choices across three distinct task domains (i.e., life–death, public property, and personal money). The choice outcomes of the problems presented in each of the three task domains had a binary structure of a sure thing vs a gamble of equal expected value; the outcomes differed in their framing conditions and the expected values, raging from 6000, 600, 60, to 6, numerically. It was hypothesized that subjects would become more risk seeking, if the sure outcome was below their aspiration level (the minimum requirement). As predicted, more subjects preferred the gamble when facing the life–death choice problems than facing the counterpart problems presented in the other two task domains. Subjects’ risk preference varied categorically along the group size dimension in the life–death domain but changed more linearly over the expected value dimension in the monetary domain. Framing effects were observed in 7 of 13 pairs of problems, showing a positive frame–risk aversion and negative frame–risk seeking relationship. In addition, two types of framing effects were theoretically defined and empirically identified. A bidirectional framing effect involves a reversal in risk preference, and occurs when a decision maker’s risk preference is ambiguous or weak. Four bidirectional effects were observed; in each case a majority of subjects preferred the sure outcome under a positive frame but the gamble under a negative frame. In contrast, a unidirectional framing effect refers to a preference shift due to the framing of choice outcomes: A majority of subjects preferred one choice outcome (either the sure thing or the gamble) under both framing conditions, with positive…

    • 9267 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psychological Gambling

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Abstract: Few studies have explored the relationship between gambling and health status. Both compulsive and pathological gambling are disorders related to obsession-compulsive disorder. The data supports the notion that gambling does affect with non-gambling health problems. The purpose of this article is to provide the information between gambling behaviors and substance use disorders, health associations, screening and treatment options for problem and pathological gambling. Pathological gambling is an addictive and stress proposing disorder. More research is needed to investigate directly the biological and health relations associated with the different types of gambling behaviors and to define the role for doctors or therapists in the prevention and treatment of problem and pathological gambling.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gambler's Fallacies

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Imagine you’ve flipped a coin three times and come up with three heads. What do you predict will come up next? According to Stephen Dubner, most people predict tails next, because they believe that too many heads has come up and that the coin must fall on the tails side, even though there is still a 50% percent chance the coin lands on heads. This is the basis of the gambler’s fallacy, which is when people make a bad decision because of the sequence of what has happens, and it happens everywhere from baseball games to immigration courts. For example, people often lose thousands of dollars in casinos everyday simply because they bet on an outcome that they believe is due, even though the game has been designed to be truly, completely random.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The third possibility does not seem to me to be a scenario in which heuristics may be applied. There may be violations of legal or corporate ethics that make it impossible to hire this candidate as marketing manager since she has been working for a competitor. This is understandable from my perspective as I am aware of similar restrictions in the company I work for. There are intellectual property concerns among competitors within the semi-conductor industry that prevent hiring people in certain positions within those companies.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Men,‭ ‬adolescents,‭ ‬elderly,‭ ‬disabled,‭ ‬and others with mental disorders are known to have gambling addictions.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hastie, R., & Dawes, R. M. (2001). Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision making (First Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage Publications, Inc.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    APA Style Of Documentation

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Hammond, K. R. & Adelman, L. (1986). Science, values, and human judgment. In H. R. Arkes & K. R. Hammond (Eds.) Judgement and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 127-143). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.…

    • 1958 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Inspection Game

    • 9096 Words
    • 37 Pages

    The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics was founded in 2000, and is based in the School of Economics at the University of Nottingham. The focus for the Centre is research into individual and strategic decision‐making using a combination of theoretical and experimental methods. On the theory side, members of the Centre investigate individual choice under uncertainty, cooperative and non‐cooperative game theory, as well as theories of psychology, bounded rationality and evolutionary game theory. Members of the Centre have applied experimental methods in the fields of public economics, individual choice under risk and uncertainty, strategic interaction, and the performance of auctions, markets and other economic institutions. Much of the Centre's research involves collaborative projects with researchers from other departments in the UK and overseas. Please visit http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/economics/cedex/ for more information about the Centre or contact Sue Berry Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics School of Economics University of Nottingham University Park Nottingham NG7 2RD Tel: +44 (0)115 95 15469 Fax: +44 (0) 115 95 14159 sue.berry@nottingham.ac.uk The full list of CeDEx Discussion Papers is available at http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/economics/cedex/papers/index.html…

    • 9096 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Risk Taking Adolescents

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Hensley, W. E. (1977). Probability, personality, age, and risk taking. Journal Of Psychology: Interdisciplinary And Applied, 95(1), 139-145. doi:10.1080/00223980.1977.9915870…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When making decisions humans commonly fall victim to errors in logic and reasoning. Since the inception of the study of the mind, psychologists have endeavored to isolate the characteristics and causes of errors in human thinking. Researchers and theorists have developed categories of such errors: representativeness heuristics, availability heuristics, memory and hindsight biases, etc. . . . In other words, to err is human.…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays