Preview

The Framers Of The Constitution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
229 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Framers Of The Constitution
The Framers of the Constitution focused on the preservation of property is designing the new government. In the Declaration of Independence which is what officially made the country official it says “that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. According to many historians “The Pursuit of Happiness” refers to property rights. We know from US history that the British Empire violated colonist property rights. For them to mention this in the Declaration of Independence speaks to its significance. Also the Framers of the Constitution included the Bill of Rights which are rights that it citizen have which secure property. An example of this would be the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Summary
    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Summary

    In the year of 1787, delegates met in Philadelphia to write the Constitution. Tyranny, a type of government with an absolute ruler was a fear. They were currently under the ARticles of COnfederation. There was a problem with this though. In the background essay, it states that “there was no chief executive, there was no court system, there was not even a way for a central government to force a state to pay taxes.”. They were in much need of a new Constitution if they were going to be an independent nation. The hard part was making the new government tyranny free. Eventually in 1787 the new Constitution is created.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of Framing The Constitution By Charles Beard
    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary Of Framing The Constitution By Charles Beard

    At the time the Constitution was written there were two different parties that wanted different things from the United States government. The Revolutionaries or “Radicals”, led by men such as Thomas Jefferson, Sam Adams and Patrick Henry, emphasized the strength and efficiency in government. These were the men who wanted Liberty and the Bill of Rights. The other famous group was the Federalists, which consisted of Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. These leaders were more concerned with popular aspects of society such as power, control, and the protection of property rights. In order to keep maintain their wealth, they supported a strong central government, much like the current British system. Both parties contained some of the boldest and most radical thinkers of their time, helping make the Constitution last over 200…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Peter Zenger's Influence On The United States Constitution
    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Peter Zenger's Influence On The United States Constitution

    Stated In Document 2 “ The constitution makers of 1776 and 1777 had to refer to basic principles partly because they lacked exact models to guide them .. The closest thing to a working model was, ironically, the British government.” After all the colonies only knew about and experienced one government at the time . They used this to there advantage playing off british ideas to create new ones that benefitted them and reflect their own ideas. This indirectly lead to the separation of powers, where no one party / power can outweigh the next .This protects our rights as citizens as now no one can abuse their power to violate them…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Essay On Checks And Balances
    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dbq Essay On Checks And Balances

    The Constitution was built to set laws and to make sure that the new country was not treated like England treated them.The Constitution guarded from tyranny due to the fact that everything has balanced power, clear structures, and a series of checks and balances on each branch in the National Government.Our forefathers helped to guard for the government using their power in a bad way.Due to our forefathers writing laws and splitting power around branches our county was built the way that it was and it stopped our powered officials from being a…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Loose vs. Strict Constructionist
    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Loose vs. Strict Constructionist

    The debate over how much power a government should employ over its citizens has been issue in the United States, since its first development of government. This clash of views essentially led to the formation of political parties, and was the first major political dispute in the United States. Federalist leader Alexander Hamilton who was pro strong central government, industrialization, businesses and banking, was for a loose interpretation of the Constitution, meaning the government had the right to interpret the Constitution and its contents based on connation, in order to protect its citizens according to the Necessary and Proper Clause. Republican’s, such as Thomas Jefferson, who was aiming in establishing America as an agrarian country favored a strict interpretation of the Constitution, meaning the government defines and applies the contents of the Constitution as they are, word for word, to be in accordance with the concept of state’s rights. The stance taken on this ongoing debate is inclined towards the side of loose constructionists, for its greater contribution in forming solutions to federal problems, helping the country flourish and aiding in today’s society as well.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Influence of Salutary Neglect on America
    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Influence of Salutary Neglect on America

    In order to make and establish the laws, the colonists needed to first form their own type of government because they could not rely on the British to make or even enforce their laws from such a far ways away. A change from what the colonists were used to was formed as a result of this. Instead of having to suffer under a malicious monarchy such as they did in England, the settlers wanted to establish a democracy in which wealthy and poor people alike had a say and choice of what to do. This idea of democracy is what is still present in America today and it is thriving unlike other countries whose government is completely controlled by one man or a selective group alone. It is thriving because everyone has a voice on the matters at hand and this voice is ultimately what leads to the formation of laws that benefit the majority of people in the country on a positive aspect. The first step the colonists took in order to achieve democracy, was to set up the House of Burgesses in 1619. This was established in Jamestown and was for a while the lone government.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Confederation And The Constitution, 1776-1790
    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Confederation And The Constitution, 1776-1790

    Was the United States in a crisis under the Articles of Confederation, or was the “crisis” exaggerated by the Federalists to justify their movement?…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Constitution DBQ
    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Constitution DBQ

    At the end of the American Revolution, the free states needed some sort of control that would generate to a unified country. Issues arose to how power should be divided between local and national governments, common laws or the protection of the unalienable individual rights. Their first attempt at solving this issue was the Articles of Confederation, which was a failure for the most part, but not completely as it formed a template for a new document. After the failure of the articles, the state delegates tried to revise the articles, but instead, constructed the Constitution. One of many distinction between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution is the creation of the legislature. Representation of one state, while disregarding the population of the state, angered many people. The Constitution is known today as the foundation of American government. But before its ratification, debates arose regarding several unresolved and problematic factors that the Articles of Confederation failed to come to a resolution. Under the Articles of Confederation, the states had far more power than did the federal government. As a result, when writing the Constitution, they sought to maintain balance between state and federal power in a way where it would benefit the nation, shifting the power to the federal government. Slavery was never mentioned in the articles, yet the North and the South began a dispute over its existence. Alongside the creation of legislature defining distinction between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, the division of power between state and federal government and the existence and purpose of slavery are issues debated prior to the ratification of the Constitution.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Historical Foundations of the United States Constitution

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Historical Foundations of the United States Constitution

    The United States Constitution is an extremely valuable document .The constitution assisted in creating our modern day United States; The constitution assisted in establishing our administration giving inhabitants privileges and liberty. The Constitution was put in place to give citizens a voice on how the country should be run and to establish laws and principles. There were five manuscripts that were very important in establishing the constitution, (A)The Magna Carta,1215 (B) The Mayflower Compact 1620, (c) The Declaration of Independence 1776, and (D) The Articles of confederation 1777 and (E) The Federalists Papers 1787-1788. The first document was the Magna Carta.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation
    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    The government was set up under the Articles of Confederation, America’s first constitution. The founders were so afraid of a strong central government that they gave all power to the states, rather than set up an over-seeing national government. The Revolution was fought to get away from an overbearing and unfair ruler, so it is understandable why they wouldn’t want another monarchy to take over. The problem was that the Articles of Confederation gave little to no power at all to their national government, causing distress and non-compliance between the states. The Articles of Confederation denied the government the ability to take care of the states and the union. An influential philosopher at the time, Hobbes, believes that it is the sole purpose of the national government to enforce peace and laws; thus making life, liberty, and the pursuit of property possible. Another influential philosopher at the time, Locke, also believes that a central government is necessary to promote public good, to protect property and promote…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Differences Between the Aoc and the Constitution
    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Differences Between the Aoc and the Constitution

    The government that our country operates under in modern times is quite different than the government in place at our country’s conception. However, they do share many of the same practices and ideologies. The Articles of Confederation were founded on the basis of a very limited national government, and the idea that states should interact with each other through a “loose league of friendship”. In this friendship, the states would work and trade together, but no form of central government was needed. This system was not nearly sufficient for the nations problems at the time. Recognizing the need for a reform, the nations leaders tried to reform the current system, and with little success, the decision was made that they should start from scratch and create a government that they believed to be the saving grace for America. This new creation was known as the Constitution. Thought to be a more comprehensive and equal system of government,…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jamestown: A Controlled Or Planned Economy
    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Jamestown: A Controlled Or Planned Economy

    We all know that King James the I sent over a group of colonists to discover and colonize the land for himself. At that time the colonists were allowed to live on it, but technically did not own it; it was the King’s land which he could grant ownership to you if he pleased. After a while the colonists grew weary of the King once he started to implement taxes, thus began the fight for independence. Fast forward to almost 200 years later, to July 4, 1776, when America became its own free country and the idea of free enterprise began. With a new country, the founding fathers had to implement laws, which can all be found in the constitution that was created in 1789.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    James Madison: The Father Of The Constitution
    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    James Madison: The Father Of The Constitution

    Why was James Madison called the “Father of the constitution”? And who is he? Here are some facts I have listed about what him and the name he is known as.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Should The Constitution Be Ratified?
    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Should The Constitution Be Ratified?

    One good idea that was brought up in the Constitution was the separation of powers. Ultimately, the constitution provided too much power to the federal government, but the separation of powers was a step away from a government like a monarchy. The separation of powers allowed the separate branches to check and balance each other, so no one branch was too powerful. This is argument made of why the president isn’t like a king. Under the Constitution, even if the President vetoes a bill, Congress can overrule the veto. However, the President could serve as many terms as they wanted, which is similar to a king. Although the Federalists implemented checks and balances into the system, the government under the Constitution was still formed in a way that the wealthy ruling class would be put into positions of power. So even though the Constitution had good ideas, it was ultimately elitist and too similar to the British…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Founding Fathers
    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Founding Fathers

    The United States' Founding Fathers had a difficult task in creating a new type of government that would protect peoples rights and states all while giving the states enough powers for the federal government. The Constitution was approved by the states and passed into law after arguments and solutions at the Constitutional Convention.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics