Preview

The Ford/Firestone Case

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1211 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Ford/Firestone Case
The Ford/Firestone Case

This case involves Ford and the Japanese tire manufacturer, Bridgestone/Firestone. The Ford Explorers which were prone to rolling over, came equipped with Firestone defected tires. The tire seemed to have a defect that caused the tread to separate from the whole of the tire and cause the vehicle to flip. Although Firestone knew about such defects, they continued to produce despite knowing the deadly consequences that lay behind their actions. The Explorer also had a bad reputation of rolling over and Ford knew it. As a result, fatal accidents occurred from these two combinations. Since this was a very serious safety issue, Ford and Firestone were ordering the recall of problem tires in Saudi Arabia, Venezuela and Asia but not in the United States. So, did the company act ethically in resolving this crisis? No, the companies failed to fix the problem in the United States. According to NHTSA, the tires have caused many deaths and injuries in the United States. In fact, these accidents would have not occurred if both companies have solved the problem immediately. Thus, despite the obvious safety issues, there were also fundamental ethical issues.

Did they protect the health and well being of affected publics?
Ford and Firestone knew that they were having problems with their products before all of these accidents happened. For instance "Ford internal documents show the company engineers recommended changes to the vehicle design after it rolled over in company tests prior to introduction."(www.ratical.org/corporation) Moreover, "In 1998, mounting insurance claims already had indicated to financial staff members at Firestone that a problem existed with the tires." (www.ombuds.org.) But Ford and Firestone did not take any action to fix the problem. So it was obvious then that they were not concerned for the well being of the people. Even staff members who knew that the safety of customers was in danger due to the defect of these



Cited: http://www.citizen.org/articles.cfm?ID=5413 http://www.autosafety.org/article.php?scid=95&did=300 http://e-businessethics.com/firestone.htm http://www.forbes.com/2001/06/19/0619tires.html%20%20 http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/release.cfm?ID=696 http://cee.citadel.edu/asee-se/proceedings/ASEE2002/P2002078INDUSBUR.doc

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ford was primarily motivated by profit and market share, evidenced by their decision to not recall the car and choice to pay lawsuits instead of fixing the gas tank issue. Ford completely disregarded their responsibility to produce a safe product by foregoing the universal safety standards in order to increase profit – this action is not intrinsically valuable as it acts for the good of the company. If this maxim of foregoing car safety in order to increase profit was applied universally, there would be obvious contradiction from the employees of Ford who drove a pinto and would not agree to this rule. This contradiction implies that the maxim to forego safety standards in the interest of profit is not morally valid, and Ford using this maxim to make the decision to not recall the cars is morally…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the latest recalls involves two companies, which are the Ford Motor Company and Firestone. About 290,000 Firestone tires will be replaced on Ford cars; this action was taken after several accidents happened. Some of the accidents were associated with the death of the drivers. Firestone and Ford Motor’s reputation and public image were affected after this recall (Hakim, 2004).…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three social issues that are in this case are that one, social issue in this case was Ford claimed the reason for the recall of the 1.9 million Ford Pintos was not for safety but for “reputational” reasons. This is a social issue because, after all the evidence was piled up on their company for being unsafe and hazardous, they couldn’t just admit they made a mistake and recall the vehicles to make them safer. No, they had to use the reputation card to help their company’s image in the long run so they wouldn’t lose profit. In this issue, there is no utilitarianism because there mindset in making this decision isn’t for the right reasons. There not doing it to intentionally increase the safety of everybody. One version, rule-utilitarianism, considers that, “a rule or code of behavior is morally right if, by its application, the consequences are more favorable that unfavorable to everyone.” They weren’t being moral when they made this decision. The citizens and people had nothing to do with the recall. It was their own self-pity and arrogance. Another social issue in this case is that in June of 1978, Ford knew that its fuel tank did not meet Federal Safety Standards, yet they didn’t do anything to warn the owners of this. It’s a fact that if people were warned of this issue, thousands and thousands of people wouldn’t want to buy the Ford Pinto. Being that this was a social issue, Ford was all about making a profit and hid crucial information for the public. The third of many social issues in this case are that when Ford was being prosecuted in the courtroom, they defended themselves against negligence by claiming its car was comparable to other subcompacts at that time.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    General Motors (GM) is one of the oldest and largest car manufactures in the United States. As early as 2001, the company began to notice issues with an ignition switch that was to be used in many car models. The problem with this switch was that a driver could “inadvertently knock them to ‘off’ or ‘accessory’ mode while driving” (Plumer, 2014). If this happened, “the engine would shut off and cars would lose their power steering and power brakes” as well as the airbags “wouldn’t inflate in the event of a crash” (Plumer, 2014). Allowing this problem to not be fixed led to many crashes and fatalities across the United States. After several years this eventually led to the recall of millions of cars and thousands of lawsuits for GM. This is an ethical issue because GM was knowledgeable of the problem and made a decision to ignore it which led to the deaths and injuries of many innocent people. In order to evaluate this ethical situation we will…

    • 3185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Did Ford exhibit “malice” which is necessary to establish in order to award punitive damages? (Yes)…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ford Pinto- Ethics

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In early 1968, the Ford Motor Company decided to take on the foreign car competition by introducing a compact, affordable vehicle they named the Pinto. What began as the decision to enter the race for the top small car ultimately led to an unprecedented court case wherein the Ford Motor Company found itself charged with reckless homicide and was the first corporation charged with criminal conduct. In this paper, the authors delve into the tragedy of the Ford Pinto fires and the ethical standards and boundaries of the Ford Motor Company at that time.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ford and Toyota Chapter 3

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both Ford and Toyota management comment on the fact that internal control over financial reporting has “inherent limitations.” What are those inherent limitations?…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ethical issues presented in this case are the different views that each individual has on how the idea of corporate social responsibility (CSR). This dispute is between Mr. Milton Friedman, John Mackey, and T.J. Rodgers; all of which has a different outlook on CSR. The definition of CSR refers to the responsibilities that business has to the society in which it operates and to those actions that a business can be held accountable. Most philosophers have come up with three different types of responsibilities that corporations can be held accountable for. The first and most important of the three is a corporation’s duty to not cause harm. If a corporation can avoid causing harm to society and consumers then they are almost obliged to do so even if it is not required by law. The second responsibility is the responsibility to prevent harm. In this situation a business would have the responsibility to prevent harm even if they were not the cause of this harm. Thirdly there is the responsibility to do good, which would involve charity work and volunteering.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blaw Paper

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethical dilemmas face many companies who are in business to provide services, sell goods or those that do both. Such dilemmas occur when a company has decided to go against the rules and regulations set out to govern their activities. They usually prove costly and the affected companies have to find ways to correct their mistakes. During this correction of mistakes, organizations tend to be sly as they only seek out ways in which they can benefit from such calamities without taking full responsibilities for their actions. This research evaluates the ethical dilemmas facing the Jackson-Miller Corporation.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study Ford Pinto

    • 658 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The moral issue of the Ford Pinto case is whether or not Ford Company is responsible for the explosion caused by the failed tank. Ford is morally responsible for the incident since it could have been prevented, public safety should be their top priority when designing their products, and they have disregarded the utilitarianism principle.…

    • 658 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case of the Ford Pinto

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Ford Pinto first rolled off the Ford Motor Co. production lines in 1971 and stayed in production in its original state until 1978. The vehicle engineers were tasked to develop the vehicle and put it into production within 25 months, which was nearly half the time in which the average new vehicle is put into production. The Ford engineers were aware that rear-end impact safety tests were pretty standard at the time, but they were not required by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration at that time. The vehicle was rushed into production anyway to compete with foreign compact cars being developed by the Japanese during that time period. Only after the vehicle was made available to the public was the vehicle tested. The Ford Pinto ended up failing the rear safety test, due to the fact that it was susceptible to fire from rear end collisions. Ford engineers determined that the problem could be resolved by installing a baffle, which protected the gas tank from being punctured during rear-end collisions. The part would have only cost between $6.65 and $11 to be install, but the Ford Motor Co. determined through cost-benefit analysis that the cost of lawsuits would be less than the cost of installing the baffle and decided not to install the baffle. Ford Motor Co. also failed to notify customers of the problem and offer them the option to have the baffle installed. Between 1971 and 1978 the Ford Pinto would be involved in thirteen rear-end collisions that caused the vehicle to start on fire. The actions of the Ford Motor Co. were scrutinized for the production of the vehicle. (DeGorge)While the vehicle did meet the safety standards of the time, Ford Motor Co. knew of the problem and did nothing to resolve it. This leads us to the question the ethical actions of the Ford Motor Co. production of the Ford Pinto. After realizing there was a safety issue with the Ford Pinto, was it morally right…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ford Pinto Project

    • 1896 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Ford Motor Company has been the leading car company for many decades. In the late 1960’s early 1970’s the company was losing the battle with Japanese with the small efficient cars. Lee Iacocca, Chief Executive Officer the Ford Motor Company wanted a car that will be competitive to these Japanese compact cars. With this intention in mind, the company wanted to manufacture a sub-compact vehicle that weighs less than 2,000 pounds and costs under $2,000. The result is the Ford Pinto. The Ford Pinto was one of the earlier sub-compact cars of the 1970’s. The Pinto was a catalyst in the revitalization of domestic compact cars at this time when Japanese imports were front rumors. Sure the car was simply affordable but had one flaw that would tarnish its reputation and the company’s. The Ford Pinto had fire hazard issues resulting from the placement and construction of the gas tank. When a Pinto is rear-ended the car would burst into flames resulting in an explosion. The company realized this concern during production. Because Iacocca wanted a fast sell of these cars records indicated that there was not a rear end collision test conducted until months after it was already in the market. Management did a cost analysis and determined that the cost of fixing the problem versus any lawsuits; it would be cheaper to pay for the lawsuits that would arise.…

    • 1896 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For many, it is not a surprise that ford motor company is known for creating great cars. Ford is well known for it is model A car witch was it is second huge success on the other hand success. On the other hand, success can be determined by another simple factor, which is environmental efficiency. Tesla model S is a success due to its. Environmental efficiency and it is powered by electricity. However, Ford Model A is powered by gasoline. Both Ford Model A and Tesla Model S have many differences and a few similarities.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firestone and Ford should have worked together in this case and been more proactive in solving the problem rather than making allegations toward each other and the consumers. After parting ways the companies did their best to make right but the damage had been done as they both failed each other and most importantly they failed the consumers. This issue was slow to develop and boil over but once it went public the efforts by the companies to maintain profitability by keeping these cases quiet for so long would in fact be a means to their downfall and cause permanent…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case study Case Overview Three men were arrested following a public appeal where a red Ford Focus was stolen from Bournemouth town centre, and used in an armed robbery of a bookmaker in Winton. Two of the men deny any involvement in the crime and the third admits to being the getaway driver. During the robbery the masked man carrying the sawn off shotgun fired it into the ceiling demanding everyone to lie on the floor. He then assaulted the store manager using the shotgun and forced him to open the safe, then placed the money in a cloth bag. The men left the scene in the vehicle reported stolen an hour earlier.…

    • 3132 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics