The Flaws in Saint Anselm's Approach on the Ontological Argument

Good Essays
Thanks to Saint Anselm, Archbishop of Canterbury1, the ontological argument was born in the early 1100’s. The ontological point of view, according to St. Anselm, describes God as “a being than which no greater can be conceived”.2 St. Anselm concluded that if such being failed to exist, another even greater being could be conceived that does exist. This argument would be illogical, as no being can be greater than the greatest being. Therefore God must exist. As you can see, St. Anselm’s ontological argument attempts to prove the existence of a greater being but his argument contains two flaws within it. The first can be seen in his definition - or lack thereof - in the idea of conceiving. The second flaw lies in what sorts of inferences Anselm asks of his reader. Later in this essay I will defend my view against the charge that St. Anselm’s argument is a priori argument and not a posteriori.

First, we must look at the idea of conceiving. The American Heritage dictionary cites to conceive as “to apprehend mentally; understand”.3 We must also look at to what extent we can conceive. In my mind I can conceive the idea of a unicorn, the body of a horse, the beard of a billy-goat, the tail of a lion and a single spiral horn positioned in the centre of their head. Now each of these properties can very well exist in space in time but together, they have not been proven to exist yet. In the ontological argument, proposed by Descartes, God is described with the traits of perfection, omniscient and omnipotent.4 Now all these traits may exist separately but together, they have not been proven to exist yet. In addition to this I would like to propose the idea’s of Immanuel Kant. Kant describes two different scenes. The first is a man with $100 in space and time. The second is a man that imagines that he has $100. Now just because you have conceived the idea of $100 does not mean that it is exists in space and time. The man with the actual $100 is obviously richer than the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Anselm’s argument did lead to objections as most do. The first was that of a Monk Named Gaunilo, who argued against Anselm’s ontological Argument with the use of the concept of a perfect island. Gaunilo argued that concept of a perfect island does not prove that the existence of an island. In this case that perfection does not imply ‘existence’. Gaunilo claims that if the word God was replaced with the words perfect island, then Anselm’s ontological argument would not conclude that the perfect island…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    had tackled the different arguments that were made by different philosophers which concerns about the existence of God. Its aim is to deepen our understanding of certain religious concepts and beliefs as it tries to critically analyze and examine through the method of philosophical inquiry. Philosophy of religion does not simply study what we believe but more significantly, subject these beliefs to rigorous rational criticism and assessment. Anselm’s Ontological Argument is an ideal of a purely analytic…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    interesting and some have been very confusing. One of our topics that I’ve found interesting and I enjoyed was when talked about the weaknesses and strengths of Gaunilo's and Kant's and their ontological arguments. Anselm’s ontological argument defined God as being “as which no other greater can conceive.” Ontological arguments tend to start with a priori theory about the organization of the universe. If the organization falls under being true there will be evidence of the existence of God, in this case. Anselm…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I can truly say that I have found Saint Anselm Ontological Argument to be very interesting and I was so fascinated by his life and the stand he took to prove his reasoning in his argument. In fact Anselm’s most famous work is his attempt to prove the existence of God in the Proslogion (or discourse) known now as the “Ontological argument.” I also found it very interesting that Mr. Immanuel Kant, another great philosopher in my view said the ontological argument attempts to show that which we can…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    a) Explain Anselm’s ontological argument (25) Saint Anselm, the author of the book The Proslogian came up with what is believed to be the first formulation of the ontological argument. The writings of the ontological argument in The Proslogian were Anselm’s reflections of the passage Psalm 14:1 “Fools say in their hearts ’There is no god’” and directs his argument at the ‘fools’ From this passage. Ontology means the study of being so therefore Anselm’s argument is formulated to prove the existence…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ontological Argument of St. Anselm St. Anselm was a philosopher who proposed the first ontological argument in Western Christian tradition back in 1078 through his work Proslogian. An ontological argument is “an argument aiming to prove the existence of God through just thought of God alone” (Timmons 439). St. Anselm believed the definition of God to be, “That than which nothing greater can be conceived.” While Anselm argued God’s existence was purely through introspection, it can be disputed that…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Explain Anselm’s ontological argument. The ontological argument was put forth at first as a prayer by the eleventh century monk and philosopher Anselm of Canterbury. In his Proslogion, which means discourse, he presented this argument as a prayer for believers to substantiate their belief in god. Anselm uses ‘a priori’ (which means before experience) reasoning, which conveys that it does not rely or depend on experience and so an argument of this sort is more plausible and likely to intrigue and…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In philosophy, an ontological argument is a kind of argument that establishes the existence of some entity. In the case of Anselm, he argues in favor of God’s existence. In this paper, I will discuss relevant information necessary to understand Anselm’s reasoning. Then I will break down Anselm’s argument. Finally, I will present Galindo's Perfect Island Objection and explain why his criticisms are unfounded. Before examining Anselm’s argument, it is necessary to understand the concepts underlying…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Anselm’s ontological argument for the existence of god is done via “A Priori” argument meaning this argument uses mostly reasoning and definition to prove his point. Anselm begins his Chapter 2 argument with his own understanding of God, “I may understand that you exist as we believe you exist, and that you are what we believe you to be. Now we believe that you are something that which nothing greater can be thought.” (Feinberg, p. 30). Anslem's understanding of God is a vital part for this argument…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anselm's ontological argument is a priori proof of God's existence. Anselm begins his argument with ideas that do not depend on experience and progress to a throughly logical explanation that God necessarily exists. Anselm's goal is to prove to the "fool" that God has to exist. He says that anyone who has an understanding of the existence of God can and logically has to believe that God really does exist. Anselm starts off with a statement that is slightly simple and straight forward;…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays