The Fire Starter Analysis

The Fire Starter Children have always been considered to be the future of America. As a country, investing in the future is crucial to the onward movement for upbringing the next generation. Because television plays a fundamental role in a vast majority of American families, its influence on young audiences has remained a great concern of the nation. For years, Congress and the Federal Communications Commission have battled with networks over the programming of children’s television due to apprehension from the effects that television could potentially have on children as a central medium of entertainment. The history of regulations geared toward children’s programming began with a major spark of attention to violence on television in the 1950s, when many parents asked legislators to do something about the potential influence of television on its younger audience. From there lit a spark in the research and analysis of television and children, along with requirements of network changes in efforts
Supreme Court case, FCC v. Pacifica, established “safe harbor hours” for broadcasters to air programming that is considered indecent for children. The requirement, enforced by the Federal Communications Commission, is based on the indication that children 17 years of age and under are not a likely audience throughout these hours. This was one of the prior efforts targeted towards enhancing the goals for children’s television before the Children’s Television Act.
With the Children’s Act of 1990, requirements exceeded the standard of safe harbor hours by establishing that broadcasters air “core programs” at least three hours a week. Core programs are designed to serve the needs of children to be both educated and informed. In order for a program to meet the requirements as core programming, children's programming must be scheduled to air at least once per week and must also air on a regular basis during safe harbor