Preview

The Federalist Side: Both Side Of The Anti-Federalists

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
93 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Federalist Side: Both Side Of The Anti-Federalists
Both sides had strong opinions and beliefs on the subject, but the side that I thought was more convincing was the Federalists side. I think the Federalists were right when they said America was in need of a stronger national government. If our government were to become weak, like the Anti-Federalists wanted, then our world would become a chaotic mess, the rules wouldn’t apply to everyone. I think that you need to have rules and laws to keep people in check, if we didn’t have them then everyone and everything would become crazy.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq
    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Dbq

    In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists Vs Antifederalist Analysis
    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page

    Federalists Vs Antifederalist Analysis

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Discusion Questions His301
    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discusion Questions His301

    What side would you take in the debates between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists? Why did the Federalists win in 1788?…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyze the Reason for the Anti-Federalist’ Opposition to Ratifying the Constitution
    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analyze the Reason for the Anti-Federalist’ Opposition to Ratifying the Constitution

    To a remarkable degree Anti-Federalist had many different views and motivations to reject the ratification of the Constitution. The both parties Federalist (also known as Nationalist) had different views on the constitution, Anti-Federalist opposed the Constitution. They felt the articles should only be amended, it also felt that the constitution gave more power to the central government and less to the states, and for having such a negative sounding label the Anti-Federalist didn’t get as much support as the Federalist.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq4: Ratifying the Constitution
    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dbq4: Ratifying the Constitution

    The major arguments in the debate over the ratification over the U.S Constitution were the rights of individuals verses the rights of the states, the supporters and the opponents, were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Both sides the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists are debating to win the support of our nation.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution
    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution

    Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ
    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Challenges in the 1790's
    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalist Challenges in the 1790's

    From the years 1789 through 1800, Federalist went through many harsh conditions. There were many disputes between the Federalist Party, led by Hamilton, and the Republicans, led by Jefferson. The events that created the most trouble for the Federalists and were most significant in the development of the Federalist Party were creating a national bank, how to pay the national debt, and establishing the public credit. Overall, the Federalists faced more of an economic challenge than anything else.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary Of The Federalist 10
    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary Of The Federalist 10

    The Federalist is a series of papers written by three men in reference and support of the Constitution. The 10th paper, The Federalist 10, is specifically written by James Madison on the topic of factions throughout the states and throughout the government. He focuses specifically on the effects that factions have on the rest of society and our ways of living. Madison starts off The Federalist 10 by first addressing what his view off a faction is which is basically a group of people or citizens who join together because of a common interest or a common purpose against another group who has opposing interests and goals. Madison's view of factions in society are along the lines of being unstoppable.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson's Anti-Federalism
    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jefferson's Anti-Federalism

    Jefferson strived to attain an efficient economy, and broaden the country’s territory. Jefferson’s anti-federalist stance determined reduced government spending on the military. He felt that if the government were to be involved in the daily lives of citizens, then they should avoid taxing the people. He cut government spending on the army and navy because he believed that it was illogical to spend money on something that was not apparent of happening. Furthermore, his beliefs of small centralized government initiated the idea that to procure a large military would commence war. By regulating military spending, the government was capable of focusing on other aspects of economic spending. Jefferson felt that government spending on the military…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Federalists vs. The Anti-Federalists
    • 1265 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Federalists vs. The Anti-Federalists

    When deciding whether the Constitution better embodied the American commitment to democracy (republicanism), or whether it produced a greater compromise to it, one must define the nature of a republican government. Both the Federalist and Anti-Federalist set forth their distinctive views on the quality of representational government, but it was James Madison and Alexander Hamilton vision I feel was the most correct. By accepting their view, it is clear that they propose the best arguments for why the Constitution establishes a greater democratic state then the Articles of Confederation. In their opposing arguments, Samuel Adams and Richard Henry Lee see the two distinctive problems with the Constitution, with regard to its democratic nature: the character of the judiciary and the process by which the executive is put into office. I will argue that federalist provide greater justification for why these two branches enumerated in the Constitution are indeed democratic (as examined through the Federalist view of republican government). First I will discuss how each side's view of "republican" government differs.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Anti Federalists
    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dbq Anti Federalists

    The Anti-Federalist had concerns almost immediately after its release. One of the concerns was how much power would be held by Congress. There was a clause in the Constitution that allowed Congress to make laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into ongoing powers. The Anti-Federalists often argued that this would allow the national government to create any law it wished. Importantly they did not want laws that would be harmful and unrepresentative for the people. In addition, the Constitution contained a supremacy clause that recognized the national government as the final arbiter of its disputes for the state which did not seem to be a fair option for the Anti-Federalists. This clause caused the anti-Federalists to believe that states and their citizens would be at the mercy of the national…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Rise and Fall of the Federalist Party
    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Rise and Fall of the Federalist Party

    George Washington’s Farewell Address was written to the people of the United States at the end of his second term as President. He wrote this as a result of his experiences, what he noticed, and saw while in his term. And he wanted to help out the next president that was coming into office. There was 6 themes that was part of the Farewell Address: extolls the benefits of the federal government, warns against the party system, stresses the importance of religion and morality, on stable public credit, warns against permanent foreign alliances, and on an over-powerful military establishment. Two themes that I’ll compare with today’s society is warns against the party system, and warns against permanent foreign alliances.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Anti-Federalists Argumentative Essay
    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anti-Federalists Argumentative Essay

    As Anti-Federalists, we argued for civil rights, and power to the people. For what seemed like an eternity, we had debated over the ratification of the constitution. Many things were said with a lot of elaboration and detail to go in them, but ultimately, it came down to four core words. Power to the people. One of the reasons that we had rejected the new central government was because it possessed too much power, and it ripped away the prestige for the states, and threatened their sovereignty. It did the same to the…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalists Vs Anti Federalists
    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalists Vs Anti Federalists

    Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty. For the Federalists, Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution didn't need a Bill of Rights, that it would create a "parchment barrier" that limited the rights of the people, as opposed to protecting them. In the ratification debate, the Anti Federalists opposed to the Constitution. They complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights. The Anti-Federalists weren't exactly a united group, but instead involved many elements. One faction opposed the Constitution because they thought stronger government threatened the sovereignty of the states. Others argued that a new centralized government would have all the characteristics of the despotism of Great Britain they had fought so hard to remove themselves from. And still others feared that the new government threatened their personal…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics