Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Fall of the Roman Republic

Satisfactory Essays
556 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Fall of the Roman Republic
The Roman Republic was great civilization with a very complex political system that still influences governments today. The Roman Republic consisted of three parts. The highest being the Consul that was made up of two male members who are elected annually. Secondly there was the Senate made up of elder statesmen that advised the Consul and finally there was the Assemblies where participants voted by group on issues.
A few of the strengths of the political system was its citizen involvement although plebeians generally didn’t have much authority. Another strength of the political system was that it was governed and based on a well spelt out law to avoid cases of dictatorship. As great as The Roman Republic was it had its weaknesses.
The weakness of the Roman Republic political system was its foreign policies that constantly had the nation at war, which drained its resources and hampered its ability to govern itself. As a result it forced the republic to depart from its tradition and appoint Julius Caesar as a dictator to deal with the social and economic crisis caused.
Julius Caesar played a major role in the civil war that began in 49 B.C.E. The war broke out all throughout the roman world. Caesar had a very decisive win. When he returned to Rome in 46 BCE He had to take on the task of running a republic that had pre existing economic problems, social problems and difficulties due to the wars. Caesar needed to restore stability to the factions that burdened the city with violence. Caesar set into motion his plans to restore the republic to its glory, he established programs of public works to create jobs for the unemployed. To help displaced peasants , he launched colonization programs all around the Mediterranean. Despite his skills the Caesar could not solve the problem of how to govern the republic because the it was growing at a rate that the traditional roman way of governing could not control. The Roman government changed very little over the entire course of the republic because Romans were a very conservative set of people, but their unwillingness to evolve their government with the changing times, was the major contributor to the Caesar’s death and consequently the end of the roman republic.
Caesar had many supporters that were pleased with the peace and order that he brought to Rome, but there were also many people including some of his supporters that were outraged because they believed that peace attained came at the price of the traditional roman republic and at the expense of the old traditional structure of power. Caesar’s iron grip on government left many senators in want for power. So on march 15 44 BCE a plot created by the sixty senators to assassinate Caesar was set into motion and he was assassinated at the foot of the Statue of Pompey.
There were attempts to celebrate his death as victory but the conspirators had no plan beyond Caesar’s murder, so with no way to control the army, or the economy the republic failed under the burden of civil wars. Thus the Roman Empire was created.
Caesar may have been a great leader but his lust for power coupled with the Romans unwillingness to change ultimately leaded the fall of the republic.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    revision notes

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages

    -as romans took over more places and people they adjusted their institutions to the task of ruling an imperial capital city and distant places. Rather than having kings they installed 2 consuls or chief magistrates who would hold office for 1 year. This radical move from kingship to republic was accompanied by measures designed to prevent a return to one-man rule. Personal authority in the republic was constrained by a strict term limit on magistracies.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beware the Ides of March

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman government was in ruin when Julius Caesar came to power in 49 BC. Rome was too large to control itself, and the only seat with effective power was the dictator. Caesar was the first emperor of Rome, and the Senate hated that he called himself king. The members of senate deemed him a tyrant, as seen in Plutarch: “Therefore the plots which had previously been formed separately, often by groups of two or three, were united in a general conspiracy, since even the populace no longer were pleased with present conditions, but both secretly and openly rebelled at his tyranny and cried out for defenders of their liberty.” (Plutarch LXXX) The Senate also wanted Caesar out of power because each of them wanted to become the dictator themselves, which would have resulted in further conflict and a bloodier war than the final Roman war.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many theories have been tossed around as to the cause of the fall of the Roman Empire. Some have been very plausible, while others are downright silly. Some people believe that it was one, some, most or all of these factors that led to the decline of the Roman Empire. In my opinion, most of these little factors would have led to this end of this great empire's mighty reign.…

    • 596 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius caesar crossed the rubicon which started a civil war that destroyed the republic of Rome. He gave land to landless people to provide reform and so people appreciated him. Caesar told the landowners to hire more free workers so that he was popular with Rome’s poor. Julius used Rome’s power and was cruel to people Rome defeated in battles. He also punished people who wanted to confirm the laws of the republic.…

    • 167 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar played an important role for Ancient Rome. Julius was a Roman statesmen who lead the Roman Republic to spread around and rise Ancient Rome. He did so many differences to the city of Rome when he became dictator, and most of the people loved his acts and his good leadership. Julius gave the people 5 different types of reforms, which the people were happy to have an considered him as a great leader. During Julius Caesar's lifetime, he had held just about every important title in the Roman Republic including consul tribune of the people, and including a high commander of the army. He suggested new laws the improve the city of Rome, most of them were approved by the Senate to make them into official laws. He reorganized the army…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fall of Roman Empire

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Empire was brought to its downfall because of the way their Social, Political, and Economic systems were working. The Roman Empire downfall was caused by the failure in their Social, Political, and Economic systems.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Republic was the period of the ancient Roman civilization when the government operated as a republic.…

    • 856 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason why having a combination of different governments was because it prevented a select few to have an overwhelming amount of power. The government the Romans where so successful with was a mixture of a monarchy (one key ruler), an aristocracy (rule by few privileged individuals), and a democracy (rule by the people). The Consuls (monarchs) were there to make the important decisions and exercised their power over public affairs. The Senate (aristocracy) was there to settle internal civil disputes and settle foreign conflicts. The people (democracy) were there to decide what course the country would decide to take and what laws reflect the views of the country as a whole. Together, these three “branches” kept each other in check and one couldn't do anything without the consent of the others. The ending result was union and balance in which every member of society had an important role I deciding the course of the country.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nine eleven paper

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Romans political power was extremely in need of assistance. Being part of the government in Rome was seen as a punishment instead of a reward. Government officials were mostly assassinated or committed suicide (Document A). There were also many civil wars, which led to the division of the empires. Rome was politically corrupt and couldn’t be fixed.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    DBQ On Julius Caesar

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Historic Background: Ever since Julius Caesar was a child he dreamed of having great power. During his early political years he used many ways to gain power including bribery, intimidation, and manipulation. He took Romans to new heights while he made Roman long lasting dreams finally come true. He fought many battles and gained Rome many resources and land. When he finally returned to Rome he settled down as dictator for life. This…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    AP world history

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rome: “republic” based on citizenship of free men; citizenship ensured loyalty to the state and brought taxes into the state treasury; emperor-dictators had to support the idea of the republic and pretend to follow what the Senate, council of elder wealthy men, decreed. Development of bureaucracy helped run empire.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Flaws

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The early Roman Republic will always be remembered for its revolutionary government. Citizen-elected leaders who represented both the rich and the poor worked together for the well-being of the country as a whole. After the decline of the Empire began, however, politics in Rome became less and less respectable. The emperor, who was at one time chosen fairly and based on merit and potential as a leader, was now being given away on other terms. The Praetorian…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome 's great political achievement was to transcend the narrow political orientation of the city-state & to create a world state that unified the different nations of the Mediterranean world. Rome overcame the limitations of the city-state mentality & developed an empirewide system of law & citizenship. Their genius found expression in law and government, the practical, not the theoretical.…

    • 966 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Republic and the Roman Empire highly differ in their political structures. The republic: created in 509 BCE. was a form of representative democracy. It consisted of 2 consuls of which were appointed by the senate and then voted on. These consuls were the head officers and the were appointed for one year. The senate was one of two legislative bodies comprised of 300 senators and 10 tribunes who were all patricians. The other body was knows as the tribal assembly and was made up of plebeians who met in a forum to vote on things such as consuls. When Julius Caesar was assassinated a civil war broke out in Rome. The senate was no longer trusted to rule Rome bringing the republic to an end and the empire to a beginning in 27 BCE. An empire is a form of government in which one person -the emperor- had all the real power. Emperors took power through force or inheritance and ruled for life, though many were assassinated. Some emperors embodied peaceful, prosperous, philosophical and basically just "great" praises. Where as others were vicious, mentally disturbed doctoral murders. The reason for the difference between the roman republic and empire is that in the republic the goal was to avoid having one person with too much power where as in the empire it was basically that due to the corruption with in the senate.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grant, Michael. "Tacitus on Corruption in the Early Empire." Bentley, Jerry H and Herbert F. Ziegler. Traditions & Enounters. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977. 270.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays