Using a certain technique, they decided to label two factors to simplify their findings. The first factor was Fidget, and was comprised on Hiding and Fidget (positively loaded), and Nervous Positive and Stillness (negatively loaded). The second factor, which we labeled Freeze, was comprised of Stillness, Facial Tension, and Silent (all positively loaded). They then found that the Fidget factor was predicted by Trait Shame, and the Freeze factor was predicted by State Shame and Trait Shame. This study aimed to assess the ability of a behavioral coding system, the Shame Code, to find the degree to which adolescents experienced shame during a socially stressful situation. They found that they were successful in developing an observational coding system that could be used to measure shame behaviors in real time. The coding scheme proved to be effective at detecting the experiences of shame, and the total Shame Code score was positively associated with State Shame. The coding system was related to state and trait shame, however, it did so differentially based on two factors, Fidget and Freeze. The Freezing behaviors, stillness, facial tension, and silence, convey a sense of helplessness that may elicit sympathetic or comforting actions. However, if these behaviors persist, they might repel others from continuing such comfort. Fidgeting, hiding and nervous positive behaviors might also lead youth to have a hard time forming relationships. The importance of peer relationships is greatest at the age of the participants they studied, which is why they believe that social impact of shame behaviors may be most
Using a certain technique, they decided to label two factors to simplify their findings. The first factor was Fidget, and was comprised on Hiding and Fidget (positively loaded), and Nervous Positive and Stillness (negatively loaded). The second factor, which we labeled Freeze, was comprised of Stillness, Facial Tension, and Silent (all positively loaded). They then found that the Fidget factor was predicted by Trait Shame, and the Freeze factor was predicted by State Shame and Trait Shame. This study aimed to assess the ability of a behavioral coding system, the Shame Code, to find the degree to which adolescents experienced shame during a socially stressful situation. They found that they were successful in developing an observational coding system that could be used to measure shame behaviors in real time. The coding scheme proved to be effective at detecting the experiences of shame, and the total Shame Code score was positively associated with State Shame. The coding system was related to state and trait shame, however, it did so differentially based on two factors, Fidget and Freeze. The Freezing behaviors, stillness, facial tension, and silence, convey a sense of helplessness that may elicit sympathetic or comforting actions. However, if these behaviors persist, they might repel others from continuing such comfort. Fidgeting, hiding and nervous positive behaviors might also lead youth to have a hard time forming relationships. The importance of peer relationships is greatest at the age of the participants they studied, which is why they believe that social impact of shame behaviors may be most