Preview

The evolution from corporate social responsibility to supply chain responsibility: the case of Waitrose

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
9776 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The evolution from corporate social responsibility to supply chain responsibility: the case of Waitrose
The evolution from corporate social responsibility to supply chain responsibility: the case of Waitrose

The Authors
Laura Spence, Centre for Research into Sustainability, School of Management, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK
Michael Bourlakis, Business School, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK
Acknowledgements
The research on which this paper is in part based was funded by the Institute for Business Ethics. The authors would like to thank seminar participants at Cardiff Business School and the School of Management at Bath University for feedback on earlier versions of this work.
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to investigate the evolution from corporate social responsibility to supply chain responsibility via the examination of Waitrose, a leading UK food retailer. These two concepts differ substantially and illustrate contrasting approaches in terms of social responsibility development and application.

Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative case study methodology is used where managers from Waitrose and its suppliers, industry experts and representatives from professional bodies are interviewed. An observation of an ethical audit with a Waitrose supplier was also conducted.

Findings – Findings show an example of good practice in the area of corporate social responsibility in the supply chain and illustrate the substantive progress that can be made in achieving supply chain responsibility. At the same time, the paper provides the specific challenges in developing from a corporate social watchdog approach to one in which the power in the chain is more balanced and where a holistic approach requires to be taken to achieve social responsibility.

Originality/value – Considering the scarcity of work examining empirically the issue of corporate social responsibility in food supply chains, this study demonstrates an evolutionary process and its stages based on an examination of Waitrose 's supply chain and the corporate social



References: Aguilera, R., Rupp, D., Williams, C., Ganapathi, J. (2007), "Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multi-level theory of social change in organizations", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32 No.3, pp.836-63. [Manual request] [Infotrieve] Better Regulation Taskforce (BRTF) (2003), "Government: supporter and customer?", Better Regulation Taskforce report, . [Manual request] [Infotrieve] (The) Independent (2008), "A black day for the banks, and the dawn of a new era", The Independent, Tuesday, 14 October, available at: www.independent.co.uk (accessed October 2008), . [Manual request] [Infotrieve] Institute of Grocery Distribution (2002), Grocery Retailing 2002, IGD, Watford, .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Est Task 1 Wgu

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    From the given company information and profile, it seems that Company Q’s current attitude toward social responsibility could be improved. Customers are not only interested in what products and services stores offer, they are also interested in how the companies serve the community. Company Q needs to change a few policies in order to improve their current social standing in the views of their customers. First, closing stores in areas of need is not a customer-friendly policy. Next, offering products customers ask for, but with limited selection and high profit margins is not a customer oriented policy. Finally, refusing to donate day-old products to charity shows a lack of caring for the communities the company serves.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    EST1 Task 1

    • 891 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Typically businesses start up with a primary goal of earning revenue – to have the company profits exceed the cost of doing business. Small, local businesses are particularly susceptible to losing customers to large, corporate companies who often force these smaller companies out of business. Does this goal to make money and/or the susceptibility of being put out of business by a larger company excuse a small, local grocery store from filling its social responsibility? No, quite the contrary. It is becoming increasingly apparent that many consumers are basing their decisions not only on the items being provided by a company but the amount of “good” or perceived good a company is doing in their community.…

    • 891 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    M&S AND RIVER ISLAND

    • 2821 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This report includes the comparison of the management and the leadership style used by Marks & Spencer and River Island. A primary research is been carried out to analyse the management of both the company. It involves a brief description of M&S and River Island and then evaluating the SWOT Analysis of both organisations in order to compare its strength, weaknesses, opportunities and threats with each other. It also analyse the different management approach adopted by M&S and River Island. Organisational structure of both company and how company communicate within their respective organisations is also been explained. This report also describes the Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethics of Marks & Spencer and River Island.…

    • 2821 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    EST1 TASK1

    • 558 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Social responsibility is business ethics that represents standards, norms, and expectations that reflect a concern of major stakeholders, such as consumers, employees, shareholders, suppliers, competitors, and the community. Lack of social responsibility opportunities is hurting Company Q’s business and its image and they don’t seem to care about it according to the given situation. The community’s perception of Company Q’s business has changed since Company Q threw away the day-old, high margin products when the area’s food bank asked for a donation. It was a slap in the face. For a small local grocery store chain that is going through a financial issues, they are not in a place to be ignorant or have a poor customer service. In today market, having good customer service and quality products are the key factors for successful businesses. In company Q’s case, they are failing at both, especially when they don’t even have the support from their own community. It is probably a good thing that they closed two of their stores in higher-crime-rate areas of the city because being in a higher-crime-rate areas would drive their customers away even more so. Even though Company Q can care less about the social responsibility, maybe we can still recommend few pointers to help them improve the business.…

    • 558 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    BHP Billiton Summary

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Carroll, A.B. and Shabana, K.M. 2010, ‘The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice’, International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 12, no. 1 pp. 85- 105.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    RWT1 Essay

    • 2603 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Smith, Alan D. (2007). Making the case for the competitive advantage of corporate social responsibility. Business Strategy Series, 8 (3), 190. DOI: 10.1108/17515630710684187…

    • 2603 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Company report review Marks and Spencer Maplecroft Maplecroft House Bath Road Bradford on Avon BA15 2PE United Kingdom T +44 (0) 1225 863 882 F +44 (0) 1225 864 950 http://www.maplecroft.net Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2005 Presented by: Maplecroft Company report review Marks and Spencer – CSR Report 2005 Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Company background....................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 CSR rationale.................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Key issues......................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Key activities and impacts......................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Business ethics ................................................................................................................................. 3 2.1.1 Governance........................................................................................................................…

    • 2504 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bradbury Pestle Analysis

    • 3840 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Freeman (2008) ‘Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputation and Success’ Darden Business Publishing, University of Virginia (note permission has been obtained for the use of this paper in this module).…

    • 3840 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stockholder vs Stakeholder

    • 23180 Words
    • 93 Pages

    * Visser, W., D. Matten, M. Pohl, Nick Tolhurst (eds.) (2008). The A to Z of Corporate Social Responsibility. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-72395-1.…

    • 23180 Words
    • 93 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social Responsibility is the new buzz word in the world of business. “It’s no longer a question of if companies should engage in [corporate social responsibility]. It’s now a question of to what extent will they do so […], “says Alison DaSilva, executive vice president for research and insights at Cone Communications (Brooks). The question, however, is not whether or not companies should be socially responsible, but how is that society defined and how is that social responsibly determined. In their debate on social responsibly of business, John Macke and T.J. Rodgers are not in disagreement about the implementation of the concept.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporations deal with a wide variety of social issues and problems; some directly related to their operations, some are not. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) can be defined as “the actions of an organization that are targeted toward achieving a social benefit over and above maximizing profits for its shareholders and meeting all its legal obligations” (Ghillyer 78). If this is the case, establishing appropriate and practical ethical guidelines in the workplace seems to be a reasonable request as a basis for corporate operations. Wal-Mart should be an example in determining what constitutes the values associated with its fundamental purpose of Corporate Social Responsibility. The four components of CSR are financial, legal, ethical, and philanthropic (Barnett). These areas of CSR ought to exist within every company’s infrastructure; however, the organization’s primary focus is usually on performance and profit not on social conscientiousness.…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Szakonyi, M 2011, 'Damco to Handle Marks & Spencer 's China Hub ', Joc Online, p. 10, Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost, accessed 29 April 2012. Walters, D. and Lancaster, J. (2000) "Implementing value strategy through the value chain", Management Decision, Vol. 38 Iss: 3, pp.160 – 178 'Western Morning News: Joanna Lumley and Marks & [...] ', 2012, Western Morning News (Plymouth, England), 27 April, NewsBank, EBSCOhost, accessed 29 April 2012. Mark and Spencer Group 201, accessed 18 April 2012 . Willis, J. 2011 “M&S –wholly embracing staff in plan to become the world’s most sustainable retailer”, accessed 27 April 2012.…

    • 2479 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In recent years, Corporate and Social Responsibility has become an ever increasing concern and source of community debate. It is now socially accepted that corporations have some ongoing responsibility, though sometimes ignored, to set a good example, make decisions based on social good and on ensuring positive environmental practices.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Propaganda

    • 3751 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Bibliography: ACCA UK Awards for sustainability 2008 judges. (2008). ACCA UK Awards for sustainability reprorting 2008: report of the judges. London: ACCA.…

    • 3751 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Lee, M-D.P., 2007. A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10 (1), pp.53-73.…

    • 3954 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays