Preview

The English Political System in the 1780s

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7456 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The English Political System in the 1780s
THE ENGLISH POLITICAL SYSTEM IN THE 1780S.

THEME

Background to the nature of government and political parties in this period.

INTRODUCTION

Today power is exercised by the leaders of that political party which currently holds the greatest number of seats in the House of Commons. These seats are contested, usually at four- or five-year intervals, in general elections at which almost all persons of eighteen years and over are entitled to vote. The general election selects individuals. However, political party organization and discipline are so extensive that it is almost impossible for a candidate to be elected who does not represent a major party. In effect, individuals are elected in a party, not a personal capacity. When they get to Westminster they are expected to vote according to party loyalty rather than personal preference or conviction when these clash. A highly developed system of 'party whips' ensures that, in most instances, the Commons votes on party lines. Thus effective power is vested in the party rather than in a collection of individuals. Political parties are all-important. We even speak of a two-party system of government, implying that the struggle for power is between two leading parties in the state who alternate in government. Since the 1920s these have been the Conservative and Labour parties. Such a system was a recognizable feature of British political life in 1867, but not in 1780.

In strict constitutional theory, power is shared between three elements - monarchy, Lords and Commons - and in the 1780s the first two of these elements had a larger role to play. In some instances this old system still impinges on the new. Parliamentary bills require passage by the House of Lords and ratification by the monarch before they carry the force of law. The powers of the upper House have been severely circumscribed in the twentieth century. It can now delay legislation but not permanently reject it. Few ministers of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first successful British colony in North America, Jamestown was created in 1607. Though at first the American colonists were heavily dependent on Britain for their financial and governmental needs, they soon developed their own cultural and societal ideals. These ideals were not deterred until after the French and Indian War, when the English recognized the need for more royal authority in the colonies. The gradual weakening of British control over the colonies until this point allowed Americans to acquire relative control of their political and economic institutions throughout the years 1607 and 1763.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 16th and 17th centuries, many European nations grew into the mold of absolutism. Starting with the role of James I, England underwent absolutist reforms as Parliament was often suppressed by the ruling monarch until the Glorious Revolution, when the supremacy of Parliament was established.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dividing a Nation The period of 1820-1840 was a very exciting time of growth in America. America was becoming more independent in its thinking and also in the way that its politics worked. There were many things that contributed to the reemergence of a two party system in the period of 1820-1840. The major political personalities were a major contributor. By using their influence on the people and their influence in the government, many men were able to help bring about the two different parties and to influence the views of each party. States rights was another major issue that helped to establish a two party system. Conflicts and disputes over the rights of the states ultimately brought about the rise of political parties by creating a division in the views of states and their people.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Washington himself thought it would be in America 's best interest to avoid forming political parties. But even having said this Washington was already involved in the formation of one of the first political parties in America. In the beginning, before the Washington Administration, there were no parties; you were either for or against Congress and or independence. When the Constitutional Convention was called we see the first major political party split. The two parties were known as the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were led by George Washington. Though he is never considered a formal member of this political party, he shared most of their views. Alexander Hamilton and James Madison were two of the first well known Federalists. The Anti-Federalists never really had an organized party, and ended up dying out as the Anti-Federalists, but almost all of its members joined up with Thomas Jefferson and became the Democratic Republican Party.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [8] Page 6 - Why Parties?: The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America - John H…

    • 2165 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Early America had no set boundaries, there were no rules to go by, there was nothing to follow. Al l the rules, laws, codes, and bills that our forefathers created were created purely from their imagination and intellectual talents. There was no previous US nation to look back on for guidance. As a result of this, it is not unreasonable to have expected plenty of disagreements in domestic and foreign affairs. These domestic and foreign affairs would completely shape the politics in the early 1790s. Was one to support the British or the French? What kind of taxes should be imposed? How should the Constitution be interpreted? These are just a few of the questions that led to the shaping of American politics in the 1790s.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rise of the political parties in the 1790’s began because of people disagreeing with the government and the governments views. Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton never stopped debating on what they believed in, which was the bank, taxes, whether to side with France or Britain, and foreign debt.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Gov't

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Most legislation originates in the Commons. The House of Lords may take a part in shaping legislation, but it cannot permanently block a bill passed by the Commons, and it has no authority over money bills. The crown need not assent to all legislation, but assent has not been withheld since 1707.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    American political culture in the 1700s was mostly about the colonist fighting and taking back their freedom and rights from the British.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the United States’ government first started, there were no political parties. However during the 1790s two different parties formed, the Federalists and the Democratic Republicans. What led to the rise of these different political parties though? What led to the rise of the political parties in the 1790s was the different views as to how the government should be run, the different ways of interpreting the Constitution, and how people viewed the Sedition Act.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although at first our founding fathers were against the creation of organized political groups, they began to emerge in the 1790's. Several factors affected the forming of political parties as we know it today – as each party under the leadership of Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson realized their differences, political parties were developed.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the 1790s, Americans became divided over how much power should be held by the federal government. This time period had a huge impact on the United States as the country had begun to struggle to gain stability. The actions of the nation's leaders, including George Washington, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson assisted in the formation of different opinions and a split within the population. Around the time of the 1790s, the nation was split between parties, Federalist and the Jeffersonian Republicans, whose political systems were highly impacted by many domestic and foreign affairs that provoked a turning point in the nation.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political parties are key institutions at the heart of the political system. However, the claim that political parties are in decline puts forward the case that the significance of the party role is diminishing. It suggests that other institutions and processes are increasingly carrying out the functions of political parties, and that these alternatives are now dominating these roles and carrying them out more efficiently.…

    • 623 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Democracy in the colonies

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though American colonies provided some economic opportunities and political freedom to its people it was still not close to a democratic society.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power in theory in this system should lie with the commons and the chamber as they should be able to voice their opinions, and fight the policies of government properly but obviously parliamentary control does limit this a huge amount as how can this be true if a party does control power the opposition will be outnumbered and effectively be a lame duck and completely pointless. It means that parliament and the mps who are not inn government or the majority party have to literally sit there and can no longer really help their constituents on the issues that matter to them this certainly limits parliaments main function especially in opposition parties in particular. Secondly there is the argument that in politics and the majority party in particular there is a certain do as your told attitude, there is no more free thinking in parliament on a large scale anymore, mps are merely there to toe the party line as they cannot really step out of line as they may be deselected at the next election. This is a huge threat to there jobs basically but is very effective on behalf of the large party as it means that party whips will have to be used less, as most people in the party know that if they want to go far into the executive then they basically must…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays