Preview

The English Civil War: Causes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1004 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The English Civil War: Causes
‘The English civil war started in 1642, primarily because of religious disagreements’. How far do you agree with this statement?
On 22 august 1642, Charles 1 declared war against hi enemies in parliament. This led to a civil war where 1 in 10 men died. In this essay I am going to explain the main causes of the civil war and then I am going to see how much I agree with the statement.
Charles got off to a bad start in 1625 when he married a French, catholic princess called Henrietta Maria. This was a very bad mistake as Charles and most of England were devoted members of the Church of England (Protestants). This was wrong as the princess could have changed the religion of England by persuading her husband and also she could have made her children catholic and they were heirs to the throne. One of the main religious reasons was that in 1633 Charles made William laud the archbishop of Canterbury. This was bad because he was a catholic and most of the people in England didn’t like that.
Another reason why Charles was not any good at sorting out religious problems was the Scottish rebellions. This was caused by Charles I making the Scottish use English prayer books. They did not like this as they were much more puritan than English people so they were unhappy about Charles changing their religion. This angered the Scots so much that they invaded England in 1639. As Charles was short of money to fight the Scots, he had to recall Parliament in 1640 as only they had the necessary money needed to fight a war and the required authority to collect extra money.
One of the more political reasons for the English civil war was the individual reign of Charles I of England. In 1629, Charles copied his father. He refused to let Parliament meet. Members of Parliament arrived at Westminster to find that the doors had been locked with large chains and padlocks. They were locked out for eleven years - a period they called the Eleven Years Tyranny. This was the period of his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In terms of finance, it can be argued that the situation was not successful. The Government managing it could not provide a stable financial settlement. Largely the King did not have much in the way of money, and Charles' excessive spending on pleasurable activities, at the beginning of his reign only exacerbated the disastrous financial situation. Initially, although Charles agreed to give up feudal dues that were revived by his father, he was granted an annual income of £1.2 million by Parliament. However, this arrangement had two drawbacks. Firstly, the financial settlement that Charles was given, was simply not adequate to his needs. Secondly, the hearth tax that was imposed to raise the money was highly unpopular to the people. It is hard to say a reign is 'successful' if the Monarch is unpopular, especially as the country at that time, was still suffering from the financial situation left behind by the…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles I did not go along with the parliament. He took a serious hit during his 22 years as king. He began to give into extra parliamentary resorts such as, new tariffs and duties and collection of discontinued taxes. This angered the parliament as taxes were being illegally collected for an already unfortunate war and one that involved France…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSH Chapter 4 Outline

    • 1878 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Charles II and James II issued decrees allowing Catholics to hold high office and woship openly. English tolerated James’ conversion to Catholicism because heirs (Mary and Anne) were Anglican.…

    • 1878 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nevertheless the factions within this created conflict that Charles’ religious policies exacerbated. Charles favoured the High Church Arminian group within the Church of England, because they stressed the God-like nature of the King. This was led by William Laud and with his promotion to Archbishop of Canterbury in 1633 this group obtained significant power and authority. They believed in ‘the beauty of holiness’ - that ceremonies, statues, priests and vestments were essential rudiments of Church service. The English Puritans were Calvinists and hated what seemed a return to the ‘popery’ of Catholicism. Laud was viewed by many as a “little thief put into the window of the church to unlock the door to popery.” In Scotland after the abdication of Mary Queen of Scots in 1567, a Presbyterian church had been established. Scottish Presbyterians were even more anti-Catholic than the Puritans. They believed that Bishops should be abolished and replaced by elders elected by a church council. Both Puritan and Presbyterian groups formed the majority and were invariably aware of the danger of a return to the Papacy. Catholicism was associated with the burnings of Protestants under Mary and with their enemies Spain and…

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In January 1649, King Charles I was executed after being charged with high treason due to political and religious reasons, some of which contributed to his refusal in accepting the peace settlements given to him by Parliament. Charles’ refusal to compromise was supported by the division that had emerged within Parliament on how to fight the civil war between the Political Presbyterians and Political Independents. The main factors of the failure to reach a settlement were religion, politics, Charles’ intransigence, the New Model Army and the emergence of radical ideas; all of which eventually concluded to Charles’ execution.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charles the First became king in England, (also in Scotland) in 1625. He caused many problems with the Parliament because he believed in absolute monarchy. At one point Parliament limited Charles The First's power and he went along with a petition they had made but soon dismissed the Parliament.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    His childhood left a mark on Charles's behaviour as king. Like James he was a believer in the divine right of kings. Unlike James, he was absolutist and tried to put it into practice. Given his belief in divine right, he saw all parliaments privileges as being subject to the approval of the monarch, not as liberties that had existed without the judgement of the monarch. Also unlike James He saw all criticism and anyone who questioned him as disloyal. An example of these in combination is when Charles I dissolved parliament because he was being criticized by Parliament as he felt he didn't need them as long as he could avoid war. This began the 11 year period known as the Personal Rule where he ran the country through royal prerogative instead of in cooperation with parliament.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They made him agree to not imprison subjects with out cause and not levy taxes without Parliament's consent. Charles did not follow these agreements. Charles offended the puritans by trying to have both kingdoms follow one religion, so the puritans rebelled.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Charles became King in 1625 he favoured the principles of Arminianism – he placed order and uniformity above tact – despite many of members of Parliament, and the English society, preferred Puritanism. Throughout the beginning of Charles’ rule he would encourage and promote Arminianism, even those who openly attacked Puritans through writing. For example, in 1926, Laud began to provoke parliament by saying in a sermon ‘Puritans were meditating a revolution in both the state and the church’; instead of punishing Laud, Charles would eventually give him the title as Chancellor of Oxford University, and then went on to become the Archbishop of Canterbury. Another example is an Arminian cleric Richard Montagu, he wrote ‘An Old Gag for a New Goose’ and ‘Appello Caesarem’, which stressed the similarities between Catholicism and the Church of England, Charles would appoint him Royal Chaplain in 1625. Puritans around this time believed the Pope, leader of the Catholic Church was the antichrist or devil and so being compared to the Catholics was an unforgiveable insult; also to appoint Montagu as the Royal Chaplain meant that Charles identified Arminianism as the religion of England, this would only cause further tension with Puritans and Parliament. Charles also antagonized Parliament by getting Laud to preach the opening sermon, and stressing obedience to the King and supported Royal Prerogative and Divine Right; these actions saw Charles as pro- catholic, which…

    • 1601 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Indeed, it would be inaccurate to suggest that there hasn’t been historical debate in what caused the English Civil war due to the bias historical interpretation possesses. Many former historians have proposed that it was long term causes that eventually deepened to cause uncontrollable conflict and division within England, such as religious and socioeconomic factors. Yet contemporary historians such Revisionists focus on short term factors, emphasising that it was the absolutist rule of King Charles who caused social and political breakdown escalating to war. Additionally, post- revisionists assess short term causes but value long term factors as a necessary cause for the English Civil War. For a historian to suggest what factors integrated…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fighting of the Civil War was the most inevitable event in American history with a loss of thousands of lives. The political battles were filled of reflections and affirmations about the perseverance of America and American government. The Northern states conquered and the country remained united. While the existence of slavery was the crucial component of conflict between the North and South, there was no other way to avoid war because the North and South had completely opposing…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The religious quarrels began right at the start of Charles' reign, when Charles married Henrietta Maria, a French Catholic. Although Charles didn't choose to marry her - his father, James, set up the marriage - the public, especially the Puritans, didn't like having a Catholic as Queen. A few extremists even saw this as a sign that Charles was secretly Catholic! After the King dissolved Parliament, he made William Laud the Archbishop of Canterbury, in 1633. While Laud was Archbishop, he made many changes to the Church. Most of these changes involved beatifying the Church and bringing back robes for priests, statues and stained-glass windows. All these things reminded the English of Catholicism, and it did not please the Presbyterians (puritans) who believed that church should just be about “you” and God, no extravagance was required and it was considered to be unnecessary.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the year 1860, the people of America believed that they were happiest and luckiest people across the globe however, the Civil War brought in a new era in the history of America the importance of the result is that it brought slavery in the US to an end. However, the politicians in the south and the north in the course of this war never believed the liberty of slaves to be the major concern of the war. When discussing the causes of the Civil War, there are two aspects that are taken into consideration: primary causes and secondary causes. The election of President Abraham Lincoln is considered the primary cause. On the other hand, the secondary causes of the Civil War were a complex chain of political, factional and socio-economic disparities evidenced between the North and the South, the most important of these being the states’ rights.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first cause related to religion, was at 1625 when King Charles I married Henrietta Maria, daughter of Henry IV of France at St Augustine's Church, Canterbury, Kent. The marriage was not popular because she was a Catholic and people thought that King Charles was going to reintroduce Catholicism.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Civil War Causes

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A common assumption to explain the cause of the American Civil War was that the North was no longer willing to tolerate slavery as being part of the fabric of US society. Also, that the political power brokers in Washington were planning to abolish slavery throughout the Union. Therefore for many people slavery is the key issue to explain the causes of the American Civil War. However, it is not as simple as this and slavery, while a major issue, was not the only issue that pushed America into the Great American Tragedy. By April 1861, slavery had become hopelessly entangled and complex with state rights, the power of the federal government over the states and the South’s way of life – all of which made a major contribution to the causes of…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays