Preview

The Effectiveness of Gun Control

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1034 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Effectiveness of Gun Control
The Effectiveness of Gun Control Will banning guns prevent crimes? In my opinion it will not. Regardless of how the government attempts to ban guns, people will find illegal ways to obtain it, as it is not hard to get them illegally. On December 19, 2012, Jeff McMahan published an opinion page on New York Times called “Why Gun ‘Control’ is Not Enough.” Jeff McMahan is a professor of philosophy at Rutgers University. He is the author of “The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life” and “Killing in War.” He has several books forthcoming, including “The Values of Lives,” a collection of essays. The author talks about why gun control should be stricter. He claims that the United States should ban private gun ownership entirely, or almost entirely. He supports his claims with a few major reasons: 1. People without gun are more vulnerable; 2. The more people that have guns, the less effective the police are in protecting innocent citizens; 3. If gun control can restrict access to guns by potential criminals, it won’t do much when guns are to be found in every other household.
If I do not have a gun then how will I protect myself? If someone breaks into my house, should I call the cops and wait for 20 minutes for them to come? By the time they arrive I could be dead. I would rather kill or scare off the criminal if the opportunity arose than be assaulted. Gun restrictions leave people vulnerable and helpless. This is because of the fact that gun restrictions restrict people's ability to have access to guns. Only criminals will use guns that are restricted, and people who are not criminals will be left without guns and unarmed. I personally never got burglarized or robbed before but my neighbor, Lou Michaels experienced it firsthand. He got burglarized in broad daylight. He called the police for help, but it took a very long time for them to arrive to the scene. So Lou was afraid to step foot in his own home for fear of his own safety. His patience grew thin

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Strict Gun Control (SGC) is defined as a “collection of legally authorized limitations designed to impose firearm shortage on the general residents” (Lance K). In the USA everyone has right to own anything or right to purchase whatever they want. In the same way people are purchasing the guns for different views. Some of them are purchasing to protect themselves and also they think that they have right to own it. Whereas, the others believe that they earn money by harming or blacking others. The best example is the death of an international student Sai Kiran Goud .On June 15, 2015 this 21 year male, doing his masters at the university in Miami was apparently waylaid by a group of suspected robbers. As he refused to give his iPhone he was killed…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The issues that I am addressing is that stricter guns control will make the American citizen less safe. First of all, stricter gun control could attacking the 2nd amendment of the constitution of their right to bear arms and to defend themselves. My stance on this issues is that trickster can control can put people’s lives in harm’s way and won’t be able to defend themselves in case of robberies, and other criminal activities.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many Americans believe that Gun-Control Laws should be enforced, because “Individuals do not need guns for protection; it is the role of local and federal government to protect the people through law enforcement agencies and the military.” (http://www.StudentNewsDaily.com) All Individuals deserve the right to carry a gun with them at all times, to use for protection. According to the Second Amendment in the Constitution, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment) Obtaining a gun, gives one the sense of feeling safe and protected given any situation. No one knows when they may be “attacked” or in danger, and the protection they need from the government may not always be there to protect them. Every American must learn self-defense and use it when needed, they shouldn’t have to rely and anyone but themselves.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stricter gun laws should not be put in place because people feel safer owning a gun. Since it is impossible for our government to protect every family from every break in or every assault, it is necessary to own a gun. Even walking around on the street with a concealed carry firearm would make anyone feel safer. In fact, (1) states that implemented "shall-issue" concealed carry laws reduced murders by 8.5%. So not only does it make you feel protected, it also gives criminals a reason to not go after you. This is just one of the many reasons why more strict gun control laws would not be the best idea.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main idea of stricter gun control is to deter crime rates, but doing this could potentially increase crime rates instead. Not allowing law abiding citizens to own guns will leave them defenseless to criminals that still have access to illegal guns. If criminals know that citizens no longer have guns to protect themselves, they are more likely to attempt that crime on them thus increasing crime rates. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), “Global Study on Homicide,”…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every Time there is a violent crime involving guns the media and public leaders blame guns and not the person accused of committing the crime FBI conducted an experiment and people were likely to be killed by a handheld object five times more than a rifle. Banning guns will affect only the law abiding citizens not criminals. Criminals don't follow the law that's why they are called criminals. If you're going to outlaw guns then might as well ban everything on market that can potentially hurt people. Gun laws in the U.S. should not be restricted because…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Answer to Gun control

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (1.) The controversial issue is about Pro-Gun lawmakers are open to limits on size of magazines.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “If someone is holding a gun to your head and you have a gun on your belt it is not going to do you any good because the person would react to you drawing the gun out”. However true this may be would it not be good to at least have the option to retaliate instead of feeling completely submissive and helpless? Knowing you have a gun can ease your mind knowing that if you can just get your hands on it it would be a fair fight. For me just having that as an option would be enough. Taking away our right to have an option to defend ourselves would be leaving us vulnerable. It would make those who have guns superior to those who have to look towards other means to protect…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, in order to really solve the violence problem United States is facing, there needs to be realistic solutions, and banning the possession of guns is not a realistic solution. Legislations who ban types of guns are ineffective in the long term. For example, the Violent Crime Control Act and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 which banned assault weapons, did not seem to have any effect on crime at all. Between the years 1994-2004, gun violence using the banned assault weapons did not change dramatically, however, gun crimes using non-banned semi-automatic weapons were rising between the years 1994-2004. The bill was finally expired on September 13, 2004 when it was ruled unconstitutional.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Guns do a lot of bad, but do a lot more good for society. Banning guns will not stop the problem, but will just make it worse. Guns are apart of our society as Americans they have been around since colonial years, and are not leaving anytime soon. “The number of guns in America has increased by more than 50 percent since 1993, and in that same period the gun homicide rate in the United States has dropped by half. (Kristof, The Times).” Guns offer protection for individuals. One day you could be in the wrong place at the wrong time, and a shooting breaks out, you will pray there is someone else there with a concealed firearm to help control the situation while waiting for police to arrive. They can’t do that if guns are banned. “We need to understand that we cannot stop crimes and murders. And banning guns would be a step, or two, backwards instead of moving forward in the right direction (The Times News).” The research conducted to produce this paper was drawn from a multitude of sources all with different…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control Effectiveness

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Does a person have the right to defend themselves? If a person does not have a criminal record, it’s their right if they want a gun or not. Gun control is not effective in the United States. Americans have rights and one of them is the 2nd amendment. People have the right to defend themselves.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As said in “Pro/Con: Gun Legislation”, “‘With just one exception, every public mass shooting in the USA since, at least 1950 has taken place where citizens are banned from carrying guns’” (Bito, Dana, Elisa Juliano). Even if one does not feel as safe with many people carrying firearms, they truly are safer. If gun laws are added, it will make it harder for law abiding citizens to obtain guns where as it will be just as easy as it had always been for the criminals to obtain guns illegally. As gun laws are tightened, less people that truly use a weapon for protection will be able to carry a pistol. When this happens, crooks will still be obtaining weapons through illegal ways such as the black market. The criminals would be more feared in the communities and would not be as afraid as before when committing a crime because the threat of anyone carrying a gun would no longer be…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first mass shooting was in Austin, Texas in 1966 by Charles Whitman at the University of Texas. He snipped fourteen people and wounded thirty-two others in less than ninety minutes. Students used their weapons from their vehicles and helped police take him down. Democratic parties are scared to bring up the topic of gun control because they fear that they will lose votes to the people that do not want gun control. Gun laws are intended to limit the amount of guns in an area and lower crime rates, but people with mental problems do not follow those rules. They set their minds on killing people and that is what they do. If gun control became stricter, then there would still be gun violence because criminals would be armed making unarmed citizens easy targets. No one can stop them because they are set on killing no matter what. They do not have to suffer the consequences of killing the people they do because most of them kill themselves when they are about to get caught or after they finish what they planned to do.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control is a very controversial issue. I firmly believe that the circulation of guns should be controlled. I do not think that guns are being controlled and I think that they should be controlled in a more fashionable manner. But I also believe Gun control will not stop violence because a violent person doesn’t need a gun to be violent. Taking guns away from violent people will not make them less violent. It might make them more violent. Violent people can use anything to be violent. Taking guns away from violent people is no more than just taking one out of a thousand more ways to hurt, rob, or kill you.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States of America, is admittedly going through many low points and difficulties with the infrastructure of the government. One of the most prevalent controversial issues among the government and its citizens is where the hypothetical “line” is drawn with gun control. Gun control presents itself as a point of valuable authority in the government to some, and also continues to be an enormous problem to others. This argument between the government and its people clash over the matters of possession and confiscation of firearms, the Constitution’s content and the position it takes to back up the issue, what the future holds for gun owners, and if the stricter control of firearms by the government actually reduces the amount of crime…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics