THE EFFECT OF USING KWL (KNOW, WANT, LEARNED) STRATEGY ON EFL STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT

English Language Teaching; Vol. 5, No. 12; 2012
ISSN 1916-4742
E-ISSN 1916-4750
Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education

The Effect of the Graphic Organizer Strategy on University Students’
English Vocabulary Building
Arwa N. Al-Hinnawi1
1

Zarqa University College, Al-Balqa’ Applied University, Zarqa, Jordan

Correspondence: Arwa N. Al-Hinnawi, P. O. Box 11974, 13118 Hay Al-Hussein Post Office, Zarqa, Jordan. Tel:
962-79-9266659. E-mail: [e-mail]
Received: September 17, 2012 doi:10.5539/elt.v5n12p62 Accepted: October 8, 2012

Online Published: October 19, 2012

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n12p62

Abstract
This study aimed at investigating the effect of the graphic organizer strategy on vocabulary building and vocabulary incremental growth of Jordanian university EFL students. One hundred and two students participated in the study which lasted for one academic semester of four months. Each student enrolled in one of two intact and equally-sized classes of a general English Language course. One of the classes was assigned to an experimental group, whose students were taught eight specific features of vocabulary items using the GO strategy. The eight features were the word’s spelling, pronunciation, part of speech, meaning in the first language, meaning in the foreign language, synonym, antonym and using it in an example sentence. The other class was assigned to a control group, whose students were taught the same vocabulary items using traditional instruction.
A pre-test and a post-test were administered to all students whose responses were analyzed using adjusted means, standard errors and an ANCOVA. Results revealed that the experimental group students outperformed those students in the control group concerning their vocabulary building. To decide whether the GO strategy had an incremental growth in students’ vocabulary building, students of both groups sat for three separate evaluative

References: Dickson, S. V., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1995). Text organization and its relation to reading comprehension: A synthesis of the research Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Williams, D. (2002). Seven literacy strategies that work. Educational Leadership, 70-73. Gilbertsen, C. (2002). Importance of graphic organizers in vocabulary development. Retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/about_6306122_importance-graphic-organizers-vocabulary-development.html (2009). Howard, P., & Ellis, E. (2005). Summary of major graphic organizer research findings. Retrieved from http://www.GraphicOrganizers.com Hutchinson, T. (2001). Life Lines: Pre-intermediate. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Iwai, Y. (2007). Developing ESL/EFL learners’ reading comprehension of expository texts. The Internet TESL Journal, 13(7), 1-5 Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2007). Graphic organizers in reading instruction: Research findings and issues. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19(1), 1-22. Kang, S. (2004). Using visual organizers to enhance EFL instruction. ELT Journal, 58(1), 58-67. (1991). Mercuri, S. P. (2010). Using graphic organizers as a tool for the developments of scientific language. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 4(1), 30-49. Nilforoushan, S. (2012). The effect of teaching vocabulary through semantic mapping on EFL learners’ 68 (2005). Service No. ED463556). Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/