Preview

The Economic Theory of Illegal Goods: The Case of Drugs

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8355 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Economic Theory of Illegal Goods: The Case of Drugs
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES

THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF ILLEGAL GOODS:
THE CASE OF DRUGS
Gary S. Becker
Kevin M. Murphy
Michael Grossman
Working Paper 10976 http://www.nber.org/papers/w10976 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH
1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
December 2004

The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National
Bureau of Economic Research.
© 2004 by Gary S. Becker, Kevin M. Murphy, and Michael Grossman. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source.

The Economic Theory of Illegal Goods: the Case of Drugs
Gary S. Becker, Kevin M. Murphy, and Michael Grossman
NBER Working Paper No. 10976
December 2004
JEL No. D00, D11, D60, I11, I18
ABSTRACT
This paper concentrates on both the positive and normative effects of punishments that enforce laws to make production and consumption of particular goods illegal, with illegal drugs as the main example. Optimal public expenditures on apprehension and conviction of illegal suppliers obviously depend on the extent of the difference between the social and private value of consumption of illegal goods, but they also depend crucially on the elasticity of demand for these goods. In particular, when demand is inelastic, it does not pay to enforce any prohibition unless the social value is negative and not merely less than the private value. We also compare outputs and prices when a good is legal and taxed with outputs and prices when the good is illegal. We show that a monetary tax on a legal good could cause a greater reduction in output and increase in price than would optimal enforcement, even recognizing that producers may want to go underground to try to avoid a monetary tax. This means that fighting a war on drugs by legalizing drug use and taxing consumption may be more



References: Program, 1987-1991 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Santa Monica, CA: RAND (Corporation [producer], 1995 Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1996. Press, 2001). Jeffrey A. Miron, “Drug War Crimes”, The Independent Institute, 2004. “Marijuana and Youth” in Risky Behavior Among Youths: An Economic Analysis, edited by Jonathan Gruber, University of Chicago Press, 2000, pp. the Dutch East Indies, 1923-28” Journal of Political Economy, 103, No. 2, April 1995, 261-279.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Many governments may struggle with whether to just decriminalize or legalize a drug entirely. Which is better for the government financially and more importantly the people? First we must understand the difference between decriminalization and legalization and the advantages and disadvantages. “Decriminalization does not mean that people can use drugs with impunity. But, possessing small amounts no longer lands the perpetrator with a criminal record or a jail sentence.” (Define Decriminalization) Before…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Another reason to act on the drug war is that people that abuse drugs are…

    • 499 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economic forces will ensure that what people want and will pay to get will match what is available. This is the concept of supply and demand. If the prices are such that people are not willing to pay it to obtain an item or service, they will choose to buy less of it, not buy it, or buy a substitute. This is the working of the law of demand. The price affects both supply and demand. When prices increase, the demand decreases, and when prices decrease, the demand increases. In the law of supply, however, if prices increase, individuals and companies will increase the supply because the opportunity cost of not producing the product rises with the price (Colander, 2010). There are factors other than price that can lead to changes in supply as well as changes in demand. These could be government policies, taxes, income, social norms or expectations, political forces, tastes, and prices of other goods, to name a few.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The market mechanism should allocate scarce resources to maximise consumer welfare. Alcohol is an example of a demerit good. A demerit good is one which is overprovided by the market mechanism. Apart from alcohol, drugs and prostitution are also examples of demerit goods. Consumption of these goods produces large negative externalities. Crime increases, health costs rise, valuable human economic resources are destroyed, and friends and relatives suffer distress. Moreover, individuals themselves suffer and are unable to stop consuming because demerit goods are often addictive. Therefore it can be argued that consumers of these goods are not the best judges of their own interests. As a result, governments intervene to correct this market failure.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case for Decriminalizing Drugs, he takes a different approach to regarding the War on Drugs. While he feels that current drug policies have failed, his book focuses on the injustice of punitive drug laws and believes we should stop punishing people for using illicit drugs. “A law whose purpose is deterrence must always be backed by a demonstration that the law is just.” (ix) His book is presented in three chapters. Chapter one describes our present drug policies and laws and raises questions to answer whether these are just or unjust and offers his position of decriminalization as a more ethical approach to drug use. Chapter two reviews the most frequent arguments used in favor of punishing drug users and Husak believes that none of these are convincing enough to warrant enacting laws on a person’s behavior. Chapter three declares that punishing drug users is counterproductive and damaging to us…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War On Drugs In The 1960s

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ultimately the new “war on drugs” had a negative impact on American life during the mid 1980s-early 2000s due to the economic costs, the strain put on our justice system, and the civil liberty violations that occurred. As with any other war or bureaucratic endeavor, money must be heavily drawn upon and invested. When discussing the overall cost of this “war” through this time, congressman Lee Hamilton stated that, “Federal and local governments spend over $3 billion each year to fight drugs.” (cite) In his quote it becomes apparent that the United States had become highly invested and arguably obsessed in a seemingly impossible “war.”…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Against the Legalization of Drugs,” by Peter de Marneffe, the argument that the use and possession of drugs needs to be decriminalized is made, because of the belief that the criminalization of drug use and possession violates the rights of citizens. In this paper, I will defend de Marneffe’s position by refuting a possible objection. Contrarians may claim that decriminalizing drugs will inevitably lead individuals to try harder and more dangerous drugs.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Social Disorganization

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    a certain commodity, individuals will be more inclined to get involved in production of an illegal…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Office of National Drug Control Policy. National Drug Control Budget: FY 2014 Funding Highlights. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, April 2013. Web. Feb. 19. 2014…

    • 2037 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, prohibiting a commodity for which there is high demand inevitably creates profit opportunities for criminal entrepreneurs, pushing production, supply and consumption into an illicit parallel economy. Countries all around the world have been struggling with the war on drug trafficking which has led to illegal acts involving cartel organization, manufacturing, distribution, trafficking and the addiction to drugs.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marijuana is one of the most common illegal drugs that available throughout the world. It was first cultivated in the United States by the native Indians during the pre-colonial period, before being commercialized by the white settlers as one of the principal cash crops that would stabilize the British Empire. However, the last two centuries have witnessed its growth as an illicit drug, and its massive commercialization primarily by the criminal drug gangs; a move that has called for heavy enforcement of drug laws to help curb it. In the midst of all these, the United States government has continuously enacted laws such as the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937, and the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 (Caulkins 23). This paper examines the pros and cons of marijuana legalization from a macroeconomic perspective and majorly focuses on expenditure, taxes, investment opportunities, and the overall improvement of the United States’ economy.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The effects of legalizing drugs would not have a major effect on organized crime. Situation in the past support the theory that organize crime would still thrive even without the sale of illegal drugs. The corruption, extortion, and trafficking would still be a major source of organized crimes income. In the 1920’s and early 30s when we had prohibition crime groups ran the illegal “speak easy”. The sale of illegal alcohol is similar to the sale of illegal drugs today. When prohibition ended the organized crime groups did not disappear they still had many other enterprising ventures they were part of.…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    War on Drugs in America

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the essay “America’s Unjust Drug War” by Michael Huemer, Huemer discusses the facts and opinions around the subject on whether or not the recreational use of drugs should be banned by law. Huemer believes that the American government should not prohibit the use of drugs. He brings up the point on drugs and how they harm the users and the people in the user’s life; he proves that the prohibition on drugs in unjust. Huemer believes that drug prohibition is an injustice to Americans’ natural rights and questions why people can persucute those who do drugs.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The liberal view on legalization reflects an assessment of the relative harms of drug use versus drug prohibition, and in that sense is similar to the libertarian calculus. But liberals put less weight on consumer sovereignty, and they are not as fundamentally suspicious of government prohibitions as are libertarians. Thus, for commodities viewed as substantially harmful (e.g., tobacco), liberals are willing to consider prohibition, but for commodities viewed as relatively benign (e.g., marijuana), they find prohibition excessive (Boyd 1998). Liberals agree on the fact that prohibition has many undesired consequences. These include the infringements on civil liberties that are an inevitable consequence of attempts to sanction victimless crimes; the corruption and violence fostered in foreign countries by U.S. attempts to enforce prohibition; the increased frequency of overdoses and accidental poisonings that results from the poor quality control in black markets; the increased property crime that results from elevated drug prices; and the violence that results because participants in black markets settle disagreements with guns rather than lawyers. Liberal legalizers argue, therefore, that the arrest and prosecution of drug users is ill-advised and that current…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While previous literature has investigated various aspects of legalization of cannabis, economic consequences of legalization of cannabis for recreational purposes should be observed. As Werb (2012) claimed, domestic illegal marijuana trade is likely to be worth hundreds of millions annually. However, according to Potter (2011) interprovincial trade policies and a legal market are likely to generate lower retail prices. The existing literature admits that there can be high financial costs from taxation losses and prosecution and imprisonment of the users and dealers of marijuana. At the same time, new tax revenues may appear because of the lack of exact…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays