Preview

The Dred Scott Case: Plessy V. Ferguson

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
289 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Dred Scott Case: Plessy V. Ferguson
The importance of the three cases presented in this discussion board are major to the nations history. Each showed both the need for civil right advancement and progress that was made in this area.

In the Dred Scott case the issue of freedom amongst slaves was first highlight in this nations court system. It can be argued that though Dred Scott was not successful in his attempt towards freedom, his case was a victory for the slave population. This is because the case examined whether African American should be viewed as citizens. Without this case there would be no example of slaveries inequality in the eyes of the legal system.

The of Plessy v. Ferguson argued the how constitutional Jim Crow laws were in the South. It highlight the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before the supreme court case Plessy v Ferguson was put into action African Americans and caucasians had separate everything, due to racial discrimination. Plessy v Ferguson began whenever a man named Homer Plessy was arrested for sitting in a “white only” car. After going to court multiple times with this case, the supreme court set the doctrine Plessy v Ferguson in place. The doctrine stated that it was constitutional to have separate facilities for both caucasians and African Americans as long as the facilities were “equal”.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case was important to United States moving forward into the civil rights movement of 1964 as we will look into why this case was so important. This case…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Dred Scott case came before the Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney was one of the five justices from states where slavery was legal. These five justices were the majority on the court, and believed that although the Missouri Compromise existed, a slave owner had the right to take his slaves anywhere he wished without fear that someone would remove his property from him. It was their feeling that regardless of the fact that Dred had lived in so called “free states,” he was still his owner’s property.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction- The population of a black male was 14.6% in 1964 and the white male population with a high school diploma was was 27.6%.It all started with the civil rights movement which was a movement so blacks can have the same privileges as whites. It was wrong that they had to separate people because of there color back then. Body Paragraph 1-The fist case is Dred Scott vs Sanford which was a judgement for the slave named Dred Scott and his wife Harriet sued for their freedom in a St. Louis citycourt.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Dred Scott Supreme Court decision is an embarrassment in American history. Before the the case was brought to the court Dred Scott,an enslaved African American, tried to buy his freedom for $300 but the offer was declined. He finally went to the court to see if his freedom could be granted through the legal system. However he lost on a technicality because he could not provide sufficient proof that he was owned by Emerson’s widow. In 1850 there was a retrial in the Missouri supreme court, which granted them freedom. However two years later the Supreme court stepped in and reversed that ruling. He finally appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which ruled that because he was black he was not a citizen, in effect he restricted, or…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, Dred Scott lost his case proving that he should be free because he had been held as a slave while living in a free state. The Court ruled that his petition couldn’t be seen because he did not own property. But it went further, to state that even though he had been taken by his 'owner' into a free state, he was still a slave because slaves were to be considered property of their owners. This decision furthered the cause of abolitionists as they increased their efforts to fight against slavery.…

    • 537 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1857, a slave named Dred Scott went to the north with his owner. While the two men got to the north the Scott’s owner died. From this Scott looked at himself as a free man. He even sued for freedom. He argued that if is owner died in a free territory that would make him a free man. Scott went to the Supreme Court to defend his freedom. The court ruled seven to two that Dred Scott was not a free man and he had to return to slavery. Scott grew with anger and still believed he should be free. The court’s decision was final and Scott was later forced back into slavery. During the Dred Scott case Chief Justice ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and he decided to abolish it.…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court of the United States rendered its choice, deciding that Dred Scott was as yet a slave in March of 1857. Much more disputably, the Court decided that the Missouri Compromise was illegal; that all blacks, free or oppressed, would never be United States subjects, and that Congress did not have the privilege to choose the bondage question in the regions. This stacked choice, which should settle the servitude question for the last time and all the more significantly relieve the country's developing sectional emergency, wound up making more strain in the nation between the North and South. The response to the choice changed by district and political gathering, with it being scrutinized by northerners and Republicans, and commended by southerners and…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott was a person that sued for his freedom. In 1847 Dred Scott first went to trial to sue for his freedom. Ten years after the case was brought before the United States Supreme Court the Court decided that all people of African Ancestry slaves as well as all free slave could never become a citizen of the United States. they couldn't sue in federal Court and The United States Supreme Court also ruled that the federal Court did not have the power to permit slavery in its territories.…

    • 545 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Slavery was at the root of the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford. Dred Scott sued his master to obtain freedom for himself and his family. His argument was that he had lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he should be considered a free man. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia around 1800. Scott and his family were slaves owned by Peter Blow and his family. He moved to St. Louis with them in 1830 and was sold to John Emerson, a military doctor. They went to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Dred Scott married and had two daughters. John Emerson married Irene Sanford. In 1842, they all returned to St. Louis, Missouri. John Emerson died the next year. In 1846, Scotts sued Irene Emerson for their freedom. The Scott’s stay in free territories gave them the ability to sue for their freedom. However, they did not do this while they were living there (Dred Scott’s Fight).…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott v. Sanford

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With the help of the antislavery lawyers, they were able to assist the prosecution, Dred Scott, with his court case (Dred Scott Decision 1). Unfortunately, in the first trial, Scott lost due to the reason of not having enough evidence (Dred Scott Decision 1). Scott, determined to get his freedom, was given the chance for a second trial (“Dred Scott Case Collection”). Their main argument, about Sanford violating his Fifth Amendment rights, made them win their case in their second trial (Justia 1). The Fifth Amendment mentions that a person’s life, liberty, or property cannot be taken away without due process of law. They were taking away Scott’s liberty, but he deserved to be free because he was taken…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1932, the Powell vs Alabama Case reversed the convictions of nine black men who were accused of raping two white women. All the defendants, apart from one, were sentenced to death after a series of one-day trials and they were given minimal access to their lawyers before their trials which meant their defenses weren’t precisely planned. The convictions were reversed because the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that they weren't given a fair trial, they were denied legal counsel, and the juries excluded members of their race. This was a significant ruling because the Supreme Court had recognised that African Americans were being treated unconstitutionally, and the little rights that they did have, had been violated. This evidence shows that the Supreme Court was important in assisting African Americans achieve their civil rights because the Courts had accepted that African…

    • 1033 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PB’s American Experience has impacted the view of racism towards blacks immensely. This event was a very prominent turning point in American history. The Scottsboro boys case has been one of the largest cases involving a black man (men) and a white women in the case of rape. This event has affected how people are judged now including taking age into consideration, not getting the facts correct, and the fact that black’s used to be very unfairly treated just because of the color of their skin. Laws, punishments, and law enforcement have changed very much since the 1930’s. Much of the racism has gone down, but it has also turned into other types of racism. Truly, the Scottsboro boys case has impacted American History in a very large way. Many…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the South, the judicial system was controversial whether you were African American, an immigrant or part of a jury. They showed how the jury selection was racist because if you weren’t the same race as the jury, you would be found guilty. An example is in the Scottsboro Trial, the jury in those trials had no blacks on the juries. This would provide an unfair trial for Blacks and deny them any justice. The arrest of the boys, trial, and events following the case of the Scottsboro Trials were an example of the racism and the unfair treatment of blacks in the court system.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plessy v Ferguson the court ruled that segregation was constitutional so long as the…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays