Preview

The Double Jeopardy Clause

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
282 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Double Jeopardy Clause
After reading the entire plot synopsis four times, and reading everything possible about the Double Jeopardy clause. I can honestly say I found this case extremely interesting and have a strong desire to watch this movie. Now this case if Libby was to actually murder Nick at the end of the movie would certainly involve a massive amount of investigations, questions, and laws.
Now throughout the movie she did in fact commit multiple offenses from deceiving a parole officer, to handling a stolen weapon, breaking parole, and numerous others. Her parole officer had also committed numerous offenses on his own as well as with Libby. There would be so much red tape that went with this that it would be nearly impossible to get to the bottom of the
case.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bravo Fernandez v. United States is a court case that deals with Double Jeopardy. Double Jeopardy can be defined as “the prosecution of a person twice for the same offense (dictionary.com). ” Bravo Fernandez v. United States was argued on October 4th, 2016, because of an incident that took place in May of 2005. Mr. Fernandez, whom is the president of a private security firm in Puerto Rico, and Hector Martinez-Maldonado who is a member of the Senate. Both traveled to Las Vegas to watch a boxing match. Mr. Fernandez and Mr. Martinez-Maldonado were indicted for the trips payment. The charges were violation of the federal bribery statute, conspiracy, and the Travel Act. These charges tied Mr. Martinez-Maldonado’s support of legislation beneficial…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether or not it was a reversible error to receive evidence of admissions by the accused recited in a conversation with a clergyman/counselor.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stone v. Powell (1976) was convicted of murder in the state of California. Powell claimed that the search against him was unlawful so the gun found on him should have been inadmissible in court. He tried to file a writ of habeas corpus but a state prisoner is not granted that right since the state provided him with a full and…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fifth Circuit Case Summary

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A deeper focus and analysis on the Fifth Circuit’s jurisprudence in this area was required. The analysis focused on the past history of how the Fifth Circuit approached sufficiency arguments, and how its approach had shifted to the present (with Rubio’s case as the newest example). See footnote 3 and 4, and the enormous research required (footnote 4 as roughly 36 or more cases firming up a consistent pattern of Jackson’s application in sufficiency cases). By extension, additional time was necessary to detail how and why the Fifth Circuit had shifted in its application of Jackson over time.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1937, Frank Palko was tried for the crimes of robbing a liquor store as well as shooting and killing two police officers chasing him down. Palko was then convicted of second-degree murder. The state opened a second trial when evidence of a confession which was not shown in the first trial was admitted, thus Palko was then convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death. Palko appealed, claiming the state had violated his Fifth Amendment right to the protection against double jeopardy. Double jeopardy is being put on trial for the same crime twice. The Court created the “fundamental rights” to guide decisions about incorporating specific rights in the Bill of Rights under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment that would…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is through our discovery of this answer that we formulate our case selection criteria, discover where to STD, earn the jury’s trust, and empower the…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamdi Vs Rumsfeld Summary

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    St. Cyr, which questioned the district court?s jurisdiction under the general habeas corpus statute when dealing with illegal immigration and anti-terrorist groups. Zadvydas v. Davis, asking whether the Attorney General has the authority to arrest a removable alien after the removal period or not. Matthews vs Eldridge, dealing with an inevidentary hearing to a disabilities beneficiary being terminated violating the Due Process of the Fifth Amendment (Cornell Law, 2004).…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The “Persons” case was a historically significant because it affected a lot of people, it led to other important events, and it still affects attitudes or beliefs today.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sheppard Case

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The petitioner filed for habeas corpus relief in the federal courts. The question was whether Sheppard was deprived of a fair trail and his right to due process according to the Sixth Amendment. Was the petitioner denied a fair trail for the second-degree murder of his wife, of which he was convicted, because of the trail judge’s failure to protect Sheppard sufficiently from the massive, pervasive, and prejudicial publicity that attended his prosecution?…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The defendant requested that the public be excluded from the proceedings. The California Superior Court granted the request because of the national attention the case received -- wanted to assure a fair trial.…

    • 4329 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 2098 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mіrаndа V. Arizona was а notable case, because of the 5-4 vote. There was one case that helped the Supreme Court with their ruling. The reason we have the Mіrаndа Ruling now is because of Ernesto Mіrаndа. The defendant (Ernesto Mіrаndа) had stolen $8, raped, and kidnapped an 18 year old. He admitted to the police that he committed these crimes even though he was unaware of his right to sеlf-іncrіmіnаtіon. Mіrаndа ended up serving…

    • 2098 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The "Miranda rule," which makes a confession inadmissible in a criminal trial if the accused was not properly advised of his rights, has been so thoroughly integrated into the justice system that any child who watches television can recite the words: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney" Yet the 1966 Supreme Court ruling in Miranda v. Arizona remains the subject of often heated debate, and has had a great impact on law enforcement in the U.S.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What makes this case standout is that it is such a high profile investigation, where Judicial Rhetoric is in used. Since it is fairly recent event not a ton of research has been done on this topic; which is partly why I chose it. Along with the fact that I’m generally curious about rhetoric used by lawyers.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    will never again be clean; she then unwittingly implicates herself and her husband in the murders of…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    jeopardy prevents a person from being tried twice for the same crime. Finally, due process…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics