The purpose of this paper is to clarify the similarities and differences between job shops and flow shops as well as advise with regard to facility layout. The selection of a job shop or flow shop layout should be made based upon the properties and characteristics the manufacturers desire to have in place for producing their products. These considerations will ultimately result in cost-saving measures as well as increases in overall efficiency.
Explanation of the Defining Attributes
Elements of Job Shops
A production environment in which similar operations and equipment are organized by function is typically referred to as a job shop. Job shops are a unique form of manufacturing in which the jobs pass through functional departments and lots. Within each lot may, a variety of different operational routing may exist. Several internal constraints on jobs and machines present themselves in this layout: No precedence constraints abide among tasks of different jobs; interruptions of tasks are not allowed; and each job can be performed only on machine at a time (1).
A particularly distinguishing feature of the job shop is its functional design. Design by process is a feature that commonly contributes to the higher customization of products. Such diverse products include space vehicles, aircraft, machine tools, and specialized tools and equipment. Due to the wide range of services provided, equipment that can perform a broader range of tasks is required and workers must have high skill levels to perform the assigned tasks. The layout tends to be less capital intensive and more reliant upon higher workforce wages (2).
Machines are grouped according the type of manufacturing process. The lathes, drill presses, and machines capable of plastic molding are grouped separately throughout the facility. Route sheets are used as the production control device to define the path of the material through the manufacturing system. Materials tend to be transported from one machine to the next on forklifts and handcarts since there the actual quantity of items produced will be relatively low as compared other layouts (3).
As production increases many job shops become production shops, where products begin to be created in large batches. Batches are produced to satisfy customer demand for an item. When items produced exceed demand, the shop builds an inventory of the item and changes over machines to fill other orders (4). In the job shop parts spend approximately ninety-five percent of their time waiting or being transported and only a very minute five percent of the time are they actually utilized (3).
Layout of the Job Shop
The typical job shop design consists of workers, machine tools, machine tool operators, and parts to be manufactured. Variables associated with job and flow shops production consist of number of jobs, quantity of machines in the shop, the job arrival rate, the processing time, total number of parts required, the due date, and the actual time to for the job to be accomplished. Job shops come in many different forms. The classical job shop is characteristically the simplest type of job shop, whereas the flexible job shop is noted for being the most complex of the various types (5).
FIGURE 1: THREE PRODUCT JOB-SHOP LAYOUT
In a job shop, the facility is laid out by function. The above figure displays three different product types making their respective paths through the facility. Ideally, of course, each of these products could randomly bounce around from job to job in a pure job shop. In reality, however, there is at least some degree of dependence from job to job.
Types of Job Shops
Job shops come in many different variations. One of the most important characteristics of the classical job shop is that manufactured parts acquire value in chronological order. Once the worked-upon part reaches its final work cell in the job shop layout, the manufactured part is ready to...
Cited: European Journal of Operations Research 93 (1996): 1-33.
2. Morton, Thomas E., David Pentico. Heuristic Scheduling Systems. New
York: John Wiley & Sons, 1993.
4. Parker, Gary R. Determining Scheduling Theory. London: Chapman & Hall,
5. Pinedo, Michael. Scheduling: Theory, algorithms, and systems. New Jersey:
Prentice Hall, 2002.
Production Economics. 40 (1995): 185-195.
Economics 99 (2006) 4-15.
10. Bertolissi, Edy. "Heuristic algorithm for scheduling in the no-wait flow-shop."
Journal of Materials Processing Technology 107 (2000): 459-465.
11. Lee, Chung Yee. "Performance comparison of some classes of flow shops
and job shops." International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 10 (1998): 379-405.
12. Guinet, Alan. "Efficiency of reduction of job-shop to flow-shop problems."
European Journal of Operational Research 129 (2000): 469-485.
14. Cheng, T. "Analysis of material flow in a job shop with assembly
operations." International Journal of Production Economics 28.7 (1990): 1369-1383.
15. Tsubone, Hitoshi, M. Horikawa. "A comparison between machine flexibility
and routing flexibility." International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 11 (1999): 83.
16. Sen, Alper. Engin Topaloglu, Omer Benli. "Optimal streaming of a single job
in a two-stage flow shop." European Journal of Operational Research 110 (1998): 42-62.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document