Preview

The Discourse Of Inequality By Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3155 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Discourse Of Inequality By Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Enlightenment Essay

Imagine yourself living in world with no social expectations, no competitions and no submission to the social hierarchy. Imagine yourself being free, peaceful, strong and powerful. Jean-Jacques Rousseau calls this state the natural state of man, the state that everyone should aspire to live in and that brings power to an individual. By exploring the natural state of man we are able to see how Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed a new understanding of the individual.
According to Rousseau man should want to live in the natural state. Nithin Coca is a journalist who writes from Colombia University discusses Rousseau’s ideas about the Natural State by saying, “Man in his natural state had more equality and freedom from
…show more content…
23). Man in his natural state does not care of what lies ahead of him. He has inner peace when he is not aware of his future. He is at peace because make no comparisons to others of how much more beautiful or intelligent he may be. The man at natural state will be at peace by just attempting to do whatever he does to satisfy himself. The “Discourse of Inequality” is book written by Jean-Jacques Rousseau. In this book Rousseau writes about the inequality of natural state he says “Man is weak when he is dependent, and is his own master before he comes to be strong” (Rousseau, 33). Rousseau explains that when man lives in a civilized society there is always someone smarter, stronger and more attractive than he is. However man is in his natural state, he becomes his own mentor and teaches himself that what doesn’t kill him makes him …show more content…
He states that the government should be transparent and how he is going to make it happen. This is an excellent source for transparency because these words are from the President himself and is found on the official White House website. It is a good amount of information on transparency and openness in the government and is written in a clear succinct manner. I recommend this to anyone looking for information on government transparency.

Roberts, Alasdair. "Govt Transparency A Necessity Not A Luxury” Scoop. Scoop, 16
Nov. 2012. Web. 04 Feb. 2013.
.
“Govt Transparency A Necessity Not a Luxury” is about Professor Roberts speech on how transparency is needed in a government. He also mentions the negative outcomes due to a lack of transparency. This is a good source to look for negative results because of the government’s non-existent transparency. It has a lot of strongly opinionated statements and paraphrasing so readers can get to the main point faster although some of the paraphrasing may seem redundant. I recommend this to high school students and beyond due to complex references and vocabulary.

Rousseau, Jean J. Contents for Rousseau 's Emile. 1762. Web. 19 Nov.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to Rousseau, in the state of nature, people tended to be isolated, war was absent, and their desires were minimal and circumscribed (i.e., commensurate with their basic survival needs). People did not have the drive to acquire more possessions. There was plenty to go around, an absence of reliance on others, and no real need for extensive social interaction. However, there did exist an unreflective sympathy and general compassion toward others that was indiscriminate and not based on merits.…

    • 2956 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau depicts man in his natural state as innocent and good, blaming the invention of property as the root of societal inequalities and lamenting the sacrifice of liberty required of members of a state. Rousseau's early man is deemed non-confrontational, concerned only with 'self-preservation'…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas Madison asserts that the State has no say over a person’s relationship with the Creator, Rousseau only rejects certain State religions on technical grounds and eventually concludes that society should demand a significant religious test. It is surprising that given Madison and Rousseau’s uniform goal, a stable society, they should come up with such widely varying methods for achieving it. One may be tempted to suggest that, unlike Rousseau, Madison considers individual rights to be more important than the proper functioning of society. Upon closer examination, however, it becomes clear that Madison and Rousseau's general disagreement on State power stems from a more fundamental dispute over how society works. According to Madison, society exists with a certain power and then instills this power in the government, while Rousseau argues that it is the creation of a government which makes society materialize. These disparate views on the directionality of government and society directly lead to Madison and Rousseau’s other…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau concludes that the progression of the sciences and arts are the cause of the corruption of virtue and morality. This discourse won Rousseau fame and recognition, and it laid much of the philosophical groundwork for a second, longer work, The Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. Rousseau’s praise of nature is a theme that continues throughout his writing career.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After explaining how the state of nature evolved into civil society when people began to rely on each other for resources, Rousseau concluded that the social contact that made civil society possible is more important that the individuals who created it. Although civil society created inequality, it also created freedom, morality, and rationality, which make people human. On the other hand, Locke explained that the state of nature evolved into civil society because people wanted to protect their property and liberties. He concluded that civil society exists to benefit the people; if the present government fails to do so it should be overthrown.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Rousseau, there are some good things in civilization but there are negatives that come with it. This correlates to his famed quote “A man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains”. This can be interpreted as people are born free, but they are chained by the societies that they live in. People believe they live above society’s standards but it is society themselves who reminds people that you always seek approval from them and always conform to their beliefs, therefore it makes us a slave to societies standards. Even the people who enforce society’s standards and think they are the perfect example for society also show that they are a bigger slave than to those who are trying to seek the approval of society. Rousseau's main argument is that the main cause for all of human nature's problem is not 'sin' but separation from 'Nature.' He believed that Nature has always been kind to man and only when he separates himself from Nature that he degenerates both physically and morally. This is in direct contrast to Hobbes' views that man is fundamentally…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Years later, President Obama has promised to make the government more transparent and open towards the public. “On his first day in office, in 2009, President Obama issued a series of executive orders designed to make "transparency and rule of law the touchstones of this presidency."” (Censorship and Freedom of Information). He later goes back against his promise by not allowing the release of suspected terrorists photos to the public claiming that though "our democracy depends upon transparency… some information must be protected from public disclosure for the sake of our…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Man is no longer himself rather he has conformed to society which he has described as a powerful and restrictive system. Rousseau believes that is man would have never gained knowledge from the arts and sciences, then they would not have the false values and motives or behave in such barbaric ways. He especially focuses on the idea of politeness. He claims that this is merely a societal norm because behind it, people are actually just lying frauds and that arts and science is to blame because it has corrupted out minds. He positively correlates the knowledge of the arts and sciences with the corruption of…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Rousseau a Philosophe?

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Self preservation is the other key principle which Rousseau attributes to his idea of Natural Right. The desire to preserve oneself is the only thing that can drive one being to harm another, but only in extreme circumstances. Through the evolution of man and the occurrence of village festivals, ideas such as…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Discourse, written by Jean Jaques Rousseau in 1754, discusses the human state of nature. This work compares savaged men and civilized men, mostly in physical terms. Rousseau aimed to find the source of inequality in the human race, by stripping man down to his animalistic nature. He begins by discussing how a natural man uses his instincts for self preservation, like an animal. After this, he mentions how civilized men tend to compare themselves to each other, which in turn destroys their empathy for others. Rousseau supports the fact that men who are in the natural state tend to do better in life than men who are civilized and this is shown through their physical and mental attributes.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Homework

    • 882 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau of France believed that in the state of nature, people would get along and work with each other. However, Rousseau thought that by interacting with each other, people would eventually become corrupt and…

    • 882 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discussions brought up by thinkers such as John Locke, Voltaire, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau encouraged the political revolutionaries in the development of the birth of the rights of a man, beliefs of equality, freedoms, and liberalism. Along with it came the arrival of the “self-made” man, referring to the embracing of liberty of the individual and accepting radical views, creating another conflict with the values upheld by the monarchy.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Right Thing Theory

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    My personal views coincide with those of the author for this week’s essay prompt, who praises the practicality of Locke’s theories while renouncing the overtly idealistic ones of Rousseau. I agree with the author’s analysis that Locke’s theory holds more merit and is more persuasive than Rousseau’s. The author of the excerpt makes a compelling argument that Rousseau’s theory of human nature is naive and not applicable to reality. Rousseau's theories are inapplicable to reality because they are far too idealistic and fail to acknowledge the self-interested aspect of human nature. The argument from the essay prompt is a strong analysis of the philosophers because it effectively uses a personal anecdote to support Locke’s theory that a desire…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau Analysis

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In ancient times all men lived in a state of nature until hardships and the necessity to form a civil society between one another became eminent. Jean Jacques Rousseau’s “The Social Contract,” analyses the steps and reasoning behind this transition. In Rousseau’s work he focuses on several key terms in order to define this transition clearly, they include: state of nature, social contract, civil society, general will, and the sovereign.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No more is Rousseau's _contrat social_, which by means of a contract establishes a relationship and connection between subjects that are by nature independent, at all based on this kind of naturalism. This is an illusion and nothing but the aesthetic illusion of the small and big Robinsonades. It is, on the contrary, the anticipation of "bourgeois society", which began to evolve in the 16th century and in the 18th century made giant strides towards maturity. The individual in this society of free competition seems to be rid of the natural ties etc.…

    • 2232 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays