In this action, Homer Plessy was a light-skinned African American, he sometimes passed as a Caucasian. He refused to sit in a JIm Crow car and this risk he took made him break the Louisiana law. Plessy also joined a group that was against segregation and purposely boarded a “whites only” railcar. He was trying to prove that the rail cars were equal and shouldn’t be divided by race. Unfortunately, Plessy was arrested for joining a “whites only” railcar while he was an African American. He went to court and he argued that railcars shouldn’t be separated from the colored people. Ferguson was the judge that was ruling the court when Plessy was proving his point. However, Ferguson and the Supreme Court ruled the law constitutional since the “colored” railcars were still working so they were “equal”. These laws are the 13th and 14th amendments of America. To conclude, segregation was involved in the case between Plessy and Ferguson and it started in …show more content…
The Plessy and Ferguson issue wasn’t fair since he didn’t get what he wanted and they used the law against Plessy so he could not get equality for colored people to ride the “whites-only” railcar. The Brown and Department of Education situation was fair by Linda, Brown’s daughter being able to go to a “whites-only” school but it was unfair when they didn’t allow her to go to the school in the beginning. The first case started the act of education desegregation and the second case helped the end segregation. In addition, the Plessy was also unfair since he was arrested for boarding a white railcar when he was a African American. My opinions on these two cases is that they were fair and